daws101
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #761
the irony in this post is so thick you need nano thermite to cut through it.Actually I don't give a shit if 911 ISJ mimic's what you morons actually did first ie, that is,
posting idiotic GIFs and snide commentary. If you don't like his crude fart comments, then post something that challenges and counters what he endorses, that 9-11 as brought to you by your loving government, is total fucking bullshit.
You fucks are actually too stupid to do that, as evidenced by your page after page of whining about fart posts and being totally unable to challenge the topic.
If ISJ is so amateurish, then why do you spend soo much time crying like little bitches over his fart jokes?
Guess it's just easier to log in and cry about fart comments, then actually try to show him up by intelligent means.
How do we show him up when he reads our posts, then pretends he has us on ignore and his only reply is that he says we "farted"?
If that is his level of response, all he deserves is mocking.
And I'm surprised anyone who does believe 9/11 was an inside job doesn't tell him to stop embarrassing the movement the way he does.
Man...you are extremely stupid. Can't you even fathom what "by intelligent means" suggests?
Let me help you along jr. It means posting a rebuttal with something in it that solidifies and explains why your position as a 9-11 conspiracy theorist is justified. Try including things like why you go against what top credible scientists and physicists, who adhere to the laws of physics and science, and who are counter to the NIST, are wrong.
That would be a start. But you can't, and you wont, so you stick to the easy and immature stuff, like commenting on ISJ's jokes.
If ISJ is so immature, then why do you fall into his little trap? Seems he outsmarts you even when he posts something that you consider embarrassing.
He wipes the floor with you with that shit every time!! Fucking hilarious!
SJ makes unsupportable claims and wishes they had merit.
like this " Try including things like why you go against what top credible scientists and physicists, who adhere to the laws of physics and science,"