Even the government itself admitted in the 70's there was a conspiracy to kill JFK.

[candycorn]

Their whole base of operations is overseas..they're used to doing things/operations away from home base....they dont want to shit in their own pool

Probably the dumbest thing ever said on this thread.

really?!, and yet you say, "The intelligence services who have agents in other countries are well schooled in having someone in a business. Having an agent pose as a doctor or nurse or whomever would not be much of a stretch compared to what you have the CIA doing."....you think setting up a doctor in fake business so he could poison the president is easier than the CIA setting up Oswald as a shooter???......THAT may be the dumbest thing ever said on this thread.

Why is it you can not quote me saying such an absurd thing? Oh yeah, because I never said that.

All I stated was that if the CIA, who has almost daily access to the President, was going to do something like this, they would do it where they have the most resources. Your idiotic statement that they have more resources overseas is a retarded comment since they are based in Virginia and, oh yeah, Dallas isn't overseas.

As for having a biological attack on the President in VA, that would have fewer process variables than turning this flake Oswald into your hit man. Lets see...he turned his back on the US, then Russia, then came back to the US. And the CIA is going to trust this boob to take the fatal shot to satisfy some "parallel interest"? Again...retarded commentary from someone who is frankly smarter than that; or at least should be.

 

[dcraelin]

Their whole base of operations is overseas..they're used to doing things/operations away from home base....they dont want to shit in their own pool

Probably the dumbest thing ever said on this thread.

really?!, and yet you say, "The intelligence services who have agents in other countries are well schooled in having someone in a business. Having an agent pose as a doctor or nurse or whomever would not be much of a stretch compared to what you have the CIA doing."....you think setting up a doctor in fake business so he could poison the president is easier than the CIA setting up Oswald as a shooter???......THAT may be the dumbest thing ever said on this thread.

Why is it you can not quote me saying such an absurd thing? Oh yeah, because I never said that.

All I stated was that if the CIA, who has almost daily access to the President, was going to do something like this, they would do it where they have the most resources. Your idiotic statement that they have more resources overseas is a retarded comment since they are based in Virginia and, oh yeah, Dallas isn't overseas.

As for having a biological attack on the President in VA, that would have fewer process variables than turning this flake Oswald into your hit man. Lets see...he turned his back on the US, then Russia, then came back to the US. And the CIA is going to trust this boob to take the fatal shot to satisfy some "parallel interest"? Again...retarded commentary from someone who is frankly smarter than that; or at least should be.

I did quote you and did it accurately. I however never said "they have more resources overseas".

"process variables"... big impressive talk ...still means nothing.

I dont think he was a boob, very smart I think most would say. All you need is the nerve,the eyesight, and the steadiness.

I should be smarter than to argue with someone who is just trolling. As the saying goes
Any jackass can kick down a barn.

The Oswald as ideologue doesnt make much sense when the Warren-report-defenders say also that he also tried to kill Walker. Walker and Kennedy were polar opposites. Robert Kennedy actually had Walker thrown into a mental hospital.

 

[Freewill]

Connally said he was hit by another bullet. How could he be wrong when the bullets were flying past his head? It's time for you to WAKE UP.

The evidence speaks otherwise, I go with the evidence.

 

[Freewill]

I consider it a piece of history. A couple guys I talked to said there were trees that have been cut down that were in the line of sight, which seems like a big problem if true. Let alone get off three shots from a bolt action.

Picture from 1963

The tree seen may be why the first shot missed.

 

[7forever]

The evidence speaks otherwise, I go with the evidence.

Are you saying that Connally would be mistaken when saying he was shot after jfk, after viewing Zapruder. Is that what you're really saying?

 

[candycorn]

really?!, and yet you say, "The intelligence services who have agents in other countries are well schooled in having someone in a business. Having an agent pose as a doctor or nurse or whomever would not be much of a stretch compared to what you have the CIA doing."....you think setting up a doctor in fake business so he could poison the president is easier than the CIA setting up Oswald as a shooter???......THAT may be the dumbest thing ever said on this thread.

Why is it you can not quote me saying such an absurd thing? Oh yeah, because I never said that.

All I stated was that if the CIA, who has almost daily access to the President, was going to do something like this, they would do it where they have the most resources. Your idiotic statement that they have more resources overseas is a retarded comment since they are based in Virginia and, oh yeah, Dallas isn't overseas.

As for having a biological attack on the President in VA, that would have fewer process variables than turning this flake Oswald into your hit man. Lets see...he turned his back on the US, then Russia, then came back to the US. And the CIA is going to trust this boob to take the fatal shot to satisfy some "parallel interest"? Again...retarded commentary from someone who is frankly smarter than that; or at least should be.

I did quote you and did it accurately. I however never said "they have more resources overseas".

"process variables"... big impressive talk ...still means nothing.

I dont think he was a boob, very smart I think most would say. All you need is the nerve,the eyesight, and the steadiness.

I should be smarter than to argue with someone who is just trolling. As the saying goes
Any jackass can kick down a barn.

The Oswald as ideologue doesnt make much sense when the Warren-report-defenders say also that he also tried to kill Walker. Walker and Kennedy were polar opposites. Robert Kennedy actually had Walker thrown into a mental hospital.

Keeping up the crazy....good job. So it's not likely that Oswald could have killed two people that didn't get along? Ahh...I see.

 

[Bfgrn]

The evidence speaks otherwise, I go with the evidence.

What are you doing that screws up every post? Just hit the "QUOTE" button and then type your response. You have words from someone else attributed to me.

 

[Freewill]

What are you doing that screws up every post? Just hit the "QUOTE" button and then type your response. You have words from someone else attributed to me.

I don't see what you are talking about. All I ever do is hit the quote button. If you look closely where you say I am quoting you it is really 7forever

 

[Freewill]

Are you saying that Connally would be mistaken when saying he was shot after jfk, after viewing Zapruder. Is that what you're really saying?

7 forever, go to this site and read about Connally's opinion on the single bullet theory and how the testimony of when he was hit is faulty.

JFK Assassination Logic: How to Think about Claims of Conspiracy - John McAdams - Google Books

 

[Bfgrn]

I don't see what you are talking about. All I ever do is hit the quote button. If you look closely where you say I am quoting you it is really 7forever

You have to be doing something. You have what I said attributed to 7forever.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

When the driver's haircut shot President Kennedy, where was IQof7Forever? And what was 9/11 Rimjob doing at that very moment?

 

[Freewill]

You have to be doing something. You have what I said attributed to 7forever.

You are right but I do nothing that I know of other then hit the quote button. Sometimes I will edit out videos but that is about it. Don't know why it is doing what it is doing.

 

[Truthseeker420]

Picture from 1963

The tree seen may be why the first shot missed.

Interesting, they described the trees as much more of an obstruction.

 

[Freewill]

Interesting, they described the trees as much more of an obstruction.

I don't know if you have noticed but a lot of things are said that don't stand up under scrutiny.

 

[Freewill]

When the driver's haircut shot President Kennedy, where was IQof7Forever? And what was 9/11 Rimjob doing at that very moment?

LOL, stop, play nice, ok don't stop.

 

[7forever]

When the driver's haircut shot President Kennedy, where was IQof7Forever? And what was 9/11 Rimjob doing at that very moment?

The driver's left arm extended over in both other films. That proves two things: The fake reflection is moot and Greer's left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence. No alterations are necessary unless something needed to be covered up.

 

[7forever]

7 forever, go to this site and read about Connally's opinion on the single bullet theory and how the testimony of when he was hit is faulty.

JFK Assassination Logic: How to Think about Claims of Conspiracy - John McAdams - Google Books

It's not faulty in any way. He just wouldn't say why he knew he was hit by another bullet, because jfk's bullet whizzed past his head from the front. Do you think a man who fired guns from childhood to adulthood wouldn't know when he was hit?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

When the driver's haircut shot President Kennedy, where was IQof7Forever? And what was 9/11 Rimjob doing at that very moment?

The driver's left arm extended over in both other films. That proves two things: The fake reflection is moot and Greer's left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence. No alterations are necessary unless something needed to be covered up.

 

[7forever]

When the driver's haircut shot President Kennedy, where was IQof7Forever? And what was 9/11 Rimjob doing at that very moment?

The driver's left arm extended over in both other films. That proves two things: The fake reflection is moot and Greer's left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence. No alterations are necessary unless something needed to be covered up.

http://www.quickmeme.com/img/cc/cca67bebd2968c11f33e5b13234a1966cb9070b085a097958dd5bMG][/QUOTE]

[B]All three films prove he was slammed backward[/B]. The driver obviously shot jfk, was proven the assassin over three years ago. Show me a man shot from the rear that was slammed backward besides jfk. Bring it on.:D

 

[Rat in the Hat]

The driver's left arm extended over in both other films. That proves two things: The fake reflection is moot and Greer's left arm was edited out of Zapruder during the shooting sequence. No alterations are necessary unless something needed to be covered up.

http://www.quickmeme.com/img/cc/cca67bebd2968c11f33e5b13234a1966cb9070b085a097958dd5bMG][/QUOTE]

[B]All three films prove he was slammed backward[/B]. The driver obviously shot jfk, was proven the assassin over three years ago. Show me a man shot from the rear that was slammed backward besides jfk. Bring it on.:D[/QUOTE]

[IMG]http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/43429820.jpg