Even Jack Smith Knows Trump Could Win The Election

[Rawley]

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same

Sounds like it to me. He was trying to take away our rights to elect a president.

Does it give you any pause that the Supreme Court slapped him down, harshly 8-0, for his ridiculous interpretation of statutes?

Using the KKK statute that is only used today against sex traffickers?

Any pause whatsoever? Or is it full steam ahead?

How about Senators, Dems included, admitting the ECA is so ambiguous they need to rewrite it?

A bipartisan Senate group announces a deal on reforming the Electoral Count Act

The 1887 law governs the process of counting Electoral College votes and came under fresh scrutiny following attempts to invalidate the presidential election results on Jan. 6, 2021.

www.npr.org

Any pause?

 

[Marener]

Slippery slope and almost impossible to prove.

What’s slippery about it?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What’s slippery about it?

Slippery that Republicans can do the same thing to their political opponents. You knew that and decided to troll anyway. Why?

 

[bodecea]

MAGAturds were yelling Trump was not getting a speedy trial, now they are yelling he is getting a speedy trial.

MAGAts are all in for voting for criminals/sexual abusers.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump was trying to take away our rights to elect a president.

 

[Marener]

Slippery that Republicans can do the same thing to their political opponents. You knew that and decided to troll anyway. Why?

I don’t think democrats are above the law so I would expect republicans to prosecute democrats who violate it.

Doesn’t seem like a slippery slope to me. You break the law, you get prosecuted. Party doesn’t matter.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I don’t think democrats are above the law so I would expect republicans to prosecute democrats who violate it.

Doesn’t seem like a slippery slope to me. You break the law, you get prosecuted. Party doesn’t matter.

Allegedly. OK

Let the witch hunt for political opponents commence. Fair enough.

 

[surada]

That's right folks. Jack Smith wants a speedy trial because even he knows Trump could easily win the election. So, it's off to the races to get Trump before Trump wins in 2024. This all proves that it's not about the law, it is about stopping Trump from being president again. In other words, massive vote suppression on a very large scale. The Democrats abuse of power for political purposes would make Putin proud.


Should he win the presidency before his cases are adjudicated, he would have broad powers to avoid prosecution, not to mention a lengthy prison sentence.

a somber trump pleads not guilty in election case - Yahoo Search Results

search.yahoo.com

Trump couldn't win dog catcher. You all should get behind Liz Cheney. She's everything Trump will never be.

 

[Independent thinker]

Trump couldn't win dog catcher. You all should get behind Liz Cheney. She's everything Trump will never be.

So, you would vote for Liz Cheney then?