When DOGE computerizes and optimizes ancient inefficient government systems with an EO, the paper employee records in a mine comes to mind as an example.
If DOGE didn't stop them they would waste money for at least 10-years.
Pam Bondi runs a tight ship. Must be too many deep state holdovers slowing things down.
I showed yo some of the democrat slush funds in post #54. I don't know of any GOP slush funds.
LOL...
Did the waste happen during Trump’s first term?
If she “ran a tight ship”, it wouldn’t take 10 months and counting to return indictments to actual fraud in the tunes of “trillions” of dollars as was alleged by DOGE.
No, you posted a bunch of hit pieces by right wing media.
You must have missed the $400 toilet seats the DoD regularly buys or the subsidies and bailouts of the already subsidized farmers.
I gave you a solid example, your reply is LOL. ok.
It happened in every president's term. DOGE found it. Can congress fix it is the question.
As I said last post, democrat are good at setting up slush funds.
www.epa.gov
www.epa.gov
nhjournal.com
The $400 toilet seats were for B-2s during the VN war. Its still expensive to build advanced weaponry, not necessarily fraud.
You mentioned something about DOGE computerizing files and something about a mine. It was hilarious.
DOGE alleged fraud.
As I said in my last post, your mischaractization is all you’re citing.
If “climate depot” says so I guess.... Are you serious?$375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier
By Isabel Vincent The Biden administration funneled at least $20 billion dollars into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded, The Post has discovered. In one case, forme…www.climatedepot.com
If this is factual...where are the indictments, arrests, trials, etc?Administrator Zeldin Terminates Biden-Harris $20B 'Gold Bar' Grants | US EPA
EPA News Release: Administrator Zeldin Terminates Biden-Harris $20B 'Gold Bar' GrantsICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Finds Gold Bars from EPA at Stacey Abrams’ Connected Group, Biden-Harris Ethical Red Flags | US EPA
EPA News Release: ICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Finds Gold Bars from EPA at Stacey Abrams’ Connected Group, Biden-Harris Ethical Red Flags
This isn’t even federalHurricane Highlights Failure of Shaheen's $42 Billion Broadband Access Program - NH Journal
New Hampshire - Hurricane Highlights Failure of Shaheen's $42 Billion Broadband Access Program - NH Journal - Politics
There are no legal “slush” funds.
LOL....sure.
Sure...where do you think these farmers are getting their bail out money? With your blob deciding what congressional appropriations actually get funded, the entire treasury is a GOP slush fund.
I assumed you knew how to use google.
www.nbcnews.com
www.newsweek.com
Fraud can be "legitimized". OK, instead of "fraud" lets call the DOGE savings "waste and abuse".
So if democrats give Podesta and Stacy Abrams billions of dollars to manage, you don't see a problem with that?
Yes it is
As I said above, instead of "fraud" lets call the democrat slush funds "waste and abuse" since they are apparently legit, but do need to be "clawed-back".
When tariffs affect farmers they need to be made whole. China reneged on their original soy bean deal with the US.
I showed you hundreds of billions of dollars setup in slush funds managed by democrat operatives. I don't know if they will be prosecuted, or if they broke any laws. But I do know that those billions of taxpayer dollars need to be "clawed-back", either by the DOJ or by congress via "rescission".
I’m aware of this. What is humorous is that in the context of saving us “billions” of dollars, you’re bringing it up.I assumed you knew how to use google.
Inside the mine housing the federal government's retirement records, now in DOGE's spotlight
After Trump's inauguration, the mine quickly drew the attention of Elon Musk and DOGE, which is looking to modernize the process.Are US retirement papers kept in limestone mine? What we know
Elon Musk made reference to the government facility while he was speaking from the White House on Tuesday.
I’d love to. Except the blob administration said it was fraud. Were they lying?
The allegations are just that allegations.
As I said above, you’re trying to re-write history.
Oh lord. Do you even remotely try to state anything truthful? The farmers were subsidized and bailed out twice in the blob’s first term. Please link to the deal that China supposedly violated.
Quick question...
We cannot talk about all of these items if Progressive Socialist Communists are totally innocent of any wrongs in every way. Years of huge ills with hidden language and tentacles have intertwined much of the programs in our nation. Removing any of them may affect payouts and who benefit sand other things. This was done intentionally. And the people who have done it are serious in their goals. A fair percentage of people in Congress have no abilities to do this. They just vote it in. This is how you get around the Constitution while praising it.
DOGE savings are $214b and counting. Modernizing outdated government systems will save billions.
Stealing billions of taxpayer dollars and legitimizing the theft by congressionally approved slush funds is actually fraud, but since its "legitimate", it needs to be "clawed-back".
The democrat slush funds are real, I gave you the links. If Trump made slush funds run by Republicans, democrats should claw them back when they are back in power.
It is fraud. But it is legitimized. The $billions need to be clawed-back via rescission.
Answered previously. Depends on the scoring. A 10-year score is roughly 10 x $214b = $2.14T
www.sott.net
Far cry from the “trillion” we were promised.
Fraud is a crime; its not legitmate
There are no “slush funds”. There are priorities you don’t like and you label them with that absurdity.
You don’t seem to know the definition of fraud. Fraud is a crime.
If scored over 10-years it is $2T
Please read this entire article. A slush fund by any other name.
www.sott.net
If a "slush fund" scammed from taxpayers is "legitimized" its still "fraud".
You’re presuming Trump wouldn’t have cut it? Yeah...you can’t have it both ways.
Please read this entire article. A slush fund by any other name.
$375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta handed out billions to charities created just months earlier
The Biden administration funneled at least $20 billion dollars into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded, The Post has discovered. In one case, former Vice President Kamala Harris handed over a check for nearly $7...
If a "slush fund" scammed from taxpayers is "legitimized" its still "fraud".
True, the DOGE savings were there thru several administrations and have a low probability of being cut, but who knows. The future is hard to predict, which is why the CBO 10-year scoring is so ridiculous, budgets change every year.
Not exactly. If the slush funds were not managed by democrat operatives you might have a point. But the money is being funneled to new NGOs with no track record. If the money was properly spent it wouldn't be fraud, it would be waste. p.s. I'm not calling it a "slush fund" everyone is, because it is.
OK, assume the ACA dies. What are the ramifications? (see below) Are these outcomes acceptable?
