End the shutdown, do this deal, extend the ACA subsidy, but pay for it by approving the $200b in DOGE savings. (Poll)

Should there be a deal to keep the ACA subsidies & pay for them with the DOGE savings?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 13.6%
  • No

    Votes: 17 77.3%
  • Other see my post

    Votes: 2 9.1%

  • Total voters
    22
The Republicans would be insane to even entertain this idea, the moment they do they've just shown that they can be held hostage by the Democrats over complete nonsense. These were COVID emergency subsidies for a bill that was sold as MAKING HEALTH INSURANCE MORE AFFORDABLE, the subsidies clearly demonstrate that the ACA boondoggle only works by making it more expensive for the people that actually contribute, not to mention the fact that it was Democrats that set the expiration date in the first place.
As I said, I don't know what happens if the ACA dies.
Would the working poor just go uninsured and go for Medicaid if they need care?
Option-A. Nuke the filibuster for funding CR's and Appropriations Bills and end this nonsense once and for all
--OR--
Option-B. Keep the shutdown going and have Russ Vought let go of 50% of the Executive Branches workforce. Personally I prefer option B.
I like Option-A
 
Only if they qualify.
If they qualify for Medicaid, why would they be on Obamacare?
So a working family on a tight budget just goes uninsured? Nasty decision.

Look at it this way. Everyone votes their pocketbook.

How many voters would Republicans lose if they killed the subsidy or Obamacare? 44 million?
 
So a working family on a tight budget just goes uninsured? Nasty decision.

Look at it this way. Everyone votes their pocketbook.

How many voters would Republicans lose if they killed the subsidy or Obamacare? 44 million?

So a working family on a tight budget just goes uninsured?

A working family on a tight budget probably doesn't qualify for Medicaid.

Nasty decision.

And?

Look at it this way. Everyone votes their pocketbook.

The government's pocketbook is empty.
 
Nope. The democrats took that out. google it
Nope, it only went up to around 600% of FPL for upper limit and there is a low end means test. I don't have to google I've worked it since it's inception.
 
So a working family on a tight budget just goes uninsured?
Nasty decision.
Look at it this way. Everyone votes their pocketbook.


The government's pocketbook is empty.
Not the point of this thread, see the OP.

If Republicans kill the subsidy (or the ACA) and lose in 2026 and 2028, what did they gain?
There are 44 million on ACA
 
Last edited:
Not the point of this thread, see the OP.

If Republicans kill the subsidy (or the ACA) and lose in 2026 and 2028, what did they gain?
There are 44 million on ACA

If they kill the subsidy and don't lose, then what?
 
I'm not an expert in healthcare insurance like the ACA or Medicaid. I've always had employer coverage.

However, MTG, who is a hard nosed Republican, thinks that the ACA should be saved.

I don't know what happens if the subsidies end, the ACA fails, and all the uninsured people use Medicaid?????

Would the subsidies be cheaper?
The ACA is nothing but a massive scam.
 
I disagree, DOGE says $214b

More waste to be clawed-back:

One of the major casualties that MAGA has brought us is that you guys and your MAGA leaders make claim after claim....

1761023896021.webp


What happened to the trillions DOGE supposedly found in savings?

It all just disappeared...poof!

If they didn’t find trillions, there is no reason to think they found billions....

Of course nobody with two working brain cells believed for a moment that DOGE found that much in waste fraud or corruption--hence the zero indictments for any fraud or corruption they SWEAR they found.

Of course that population excludes you...you bought into ALL OF IT!

While you are laughing, I can't wait for the fraudsters to start getting indicted and trying to cop a plea deal by rolling over on a higher-up. This discovery of massive fraud is getting funnier all the time.

So how will the fraud be prosecuted?
Does the FBI or OMB need to make the cases and present the evidence?
Does Congress need to pass LAWS to make any DOGE evidence legal?

I want to start seeing perps trying to cop a plea deal by rolling over on the higher-ups.

What shit? DOGE said they will cut $2T from the bloated Federal Budget.
Trump ran the US on $4T. Biden's last Budget was $7.3T
There is a LOT of waste, fraud, and abuse to cut.
LOL.... hooo boy..... $2T down to what are you saying now...$214 B? What happened to the other $1.8 Trillion they say they found sonnny boy?

While you are laughing, I can't wait for the fraudsters to start getting indicted and trying to cop a plea deal by rolling over on a higher-up. This discovery of massive fraud is getting funnier all the time.

So when do you think these “fraudsters” will be indicted--its been 10 months; 300 days.

Heres the part where you make excuse after excuse for why your heroes, Trump, Blondie, Patel, and Bongo are suddenly the most inept people on earth!!!!

Excuse me while I laugh harder.
 
One of the major casualties that MAGA has brought us is that you guys and your MAGA leaders make claim after claim....
What happened to the trillions DOGE supposedly found in savings? It all just disappeared...poof!
If they didn’t find trillions, there is no reason to think they found billions....
Of course nobody with two working brain cells believed for a moment that DOGE found that much in waste fraud or corruption--hence the zero indictments for any fraud or corruption they SWEAR they found.
Of course that population excludes you...you bought into ALL OF IT!
LOL..hooo boy. $2T down to what are you saying now...$214 B? What happened to the other $1.8 Trillion they say they found sonny boy?
So when do you think these “fraudsters” will be indicted--its been 10 months; 300 days.
Here's the part where you make excuse after excuse for why your heroes, Trump, Blondie, Patel, and Bongo are suddenly the most inept people on earth!!!! Excuse me while I laugh harder.
There is a difference between generic "waste, fraud, and abuse" that can be fixed with EOs, and the criminal "slush funds" legitimately setup by the democrats.
DOGE found $214b in savings that is not chump change. If it is scored over 10-years, like all DC items its $2T.

But the big bucks that needs to be "clawed-back" are these:

So there are billions of dollars scammed by the democrats into their slush funds, but as you say, where are the indictments?
I gotta give the devil his due, the democrats are very good at legal thievery.
 
How about that deal?

Democrats want to keep the ACA subsidy. Does it cost $150b a year or $35b a year??

Republicans want to save $200b in DOGE savings

So lets make a deal. Keep the subsidy, but do the DOGE cuts, AND pass all 12 appropriations bills and the clean CR.


$214b potential saving
Ah...LAMO! You can't make a deal with a party so corrupt they will F you over first chance they get and weasel out of it.
 
15th post
There is a difference between generic "waste, fraud, and abuse" that can be fixed with EOs, and the criminal "slush funds" legitimately setup by the democrats.
Makes zero sense. EO’s fix fraud? Nope. Fraud is a crime when it involves public funds. Abuse can be a crime as well.


DOGE found $214b in savings that is not chump change. If it is scored over 10-years, like all DC items it’s $2T.

Must be more of that Trump math. You didn’t save $2T. You stopped a $200B program once.
where are the indictments?
Indeed. Where are your threads alleging corruption in the blob’s DOJ? It’s been 10 months….whats the hold up?
I gotta give the devil his due, the democrats are very good at legal thievery.
No republicans voted for anything you deem wasteful?

Really?
 
ACA and related subsidies have driven up the price on healthcare. Ending these ridiculous subsidies is only the first step in getting government out of yet another industry they have corrupted.
 
Just to note...something I've been complaining about for years.

the argument here is that the "Affordable" health care is not affordable.
 
Back
Top Bottom