XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 31,834
- 11,567
- 1,285
So not touching the other person means shoot dead. Derp.So a slap means shoot dead. Derp
You’re being inconsistent but you’re too partisan to realize it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So not touching the other person means shoot dead. Derp.So a slap means shoot dead. Derp
The difference is….that will apply to both sides. He won’t allow the Left to spew any lies, either.I'm just waiting to see what the reaction of many out there is when Musk allows many people back to Twitter who were taken off the platform, then has to remove them again for spewing crazy bullshit.
Yes, I do think that Musk is going to allow people to voice their opinions, but I don't think he's going to stand for people using Twitter to spread lies and disinformation. He seems smarter than that.
The difference is….that will apply to both sides. He won’t allow the Left to spew any lies, either.
Agree. The problem up until now is that Twitter was flagging things -or removed them - as “misinformation” when it simply refuted the liberal position. Thank G-d that will no longer happen, and people will be able to read both sides of a position.You know, if people want to spew lies on Twitter, I think that should be allowed, because as another poster said, lies and disinformation is supported by free speech. However, I also think that if someone is saying something that is factually wrong or a lie on Twitter, their post should be flagged as being wrong. People should have the ability to say what they want and be known for being the idiot liars that they are. Many do that very thing on here.
what?Elon Musk tried to shoot Kyle Rittenhouse.
No....what?
are u smoking that green stuff?
I come here looking for info and comments on ... Wait... what did I come here looking for?
I will have to go back to the OP title... sigh
Ok, I'm back..
came here looking for info on Musk and Twitter
lots of people changing the topic...
I am wondering how much M owns of Twitter at this time? I heard it was a small % age
100% correctAgree. The problem up until now is that Twitter was flagging things -or removed them - as “misinformation” when it simply refuted the liberal position. Thank G-d that will no longer happen, and people will be able to read both sides of a position.
You post to me whining about me responding to you.Did you click the link in my detailed post? I guess I have wasted my time on a retard. Fuck off.
don't get it...
you posted MY comments...
Elon Musk is prohibited from criticizing Twitter via tweet in a clause of his $44 billion buyout agreement with the company, a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing shows.
The agreement, finalized Monday, states that Musk “shall be permitted to issue Tweets about the Merger or the transactions contemplated hereby so long as such Tweets do not disparage the Company or its Representatives,” according to the filing. The SEC filing refers to Musk as the “equity investor.”
Musk seemingly tested these boundaries in a Tuesday tweet responding to podcast host Saagar Enjeti’s commentary on Twitter’s lawyer, Vijaya Gadde, reportedly crying at a virtual meeting over the deal. The Tesla CEO publicly ripped the platform for locking the New York Post’s account in 2020 for sharing a report on Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Musk and the company are both subject to a $1 billion breakup fee if either party violates certain provisions laid out in the agreement, according to the SEC filing.
You post to me whining about me responding to you.
You are a maroon of the ‘nth variety.
Lots of snarky shit will drool out from lib loons suggesting that he will be prevented or hampered.Elon Musk already banned from his Twitter?
Elon Musk Banned From Criticizing Twitter In Buyout Agreement