When Tech moguls collide.....Musk loses case against OpenAI

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
76,625
Reaction score
113,425
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia

Elon Musk waited too long to sue OpenAI and its leaders, a jury in Oakland, California, decided on Monday. A lawsuit he filed was barred by the statute of limitations, the jury found after about 90 minutes of deliberation.

The jury’s ruling will advise Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who will have the final say. But she has indicated that her decision would align with the jury’s.

“I think that there’s a substantial amount of evidence to support the jury’s finding, which is why I was prepared to dismiss on the spot,” she told Musk’s attorney on Monday.

Musk’s case threatened to derail the ChatGPT maker as it planned what could be a blockbuster IPO. The jury’s decision is a win for OpenAI and its founders, Altman and Brockman.

OpenAI’s attorneys argued the company’s mission hasn’t changed, that it’s still run by a non-profit foundation board, and that Musk waited to file the suit until he founded his own competing artificial intelligence company, xAI. The jury agreed, finding that Musk was aware of the behavior discussed in the lawsuit as early as 2021.

OpenAI’s attorneys also claimed that Musk’s donations did not come with a commitment to stay a nonprofit and that the Tesla CEO at various points pushed for OpenAI to create a for-profit entity to compete with Google. They also said Musk tried to gain control of the for-profit entity and left the company when he failed to do so.

Musk asked the court to force OpenAI to pay back more than $130 billion to OpenAI’s nonprofit arm, remove Altman and Brockman from their leadership roles and unwind the corporate restructuring that turned OpenAI into one of the world’s most valuable tech companies.

LOL.....I don't know who I would have rooted for on this one. More like "when a-holes collide".
 

Each side accused the other of being more interested in money than serving the public. OAKLAND, California May 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. jury on Monday ruled against Elon Musk in his lawsuit against OpenAI, finding the artificial intelligence company not liable to the world’s richest person for having allegedly strayed from its original mission to benefit humanity.​



In a unanimous verdict, the jury in Oakland, California federal court said Musk had brought his case too late.

The trial began on April 28. It has widely been seen as a critical moment for the future of OpenAI and artificial intelligence generally, both in how it should be used and who should benefit from it, including financially.

People use AI for myriad purposes such as education, facial recognition, financial advice, journalism, legal research, medical diagnoses, and harmful deep-fakes.

This was nothing more than Musk wanting to take ball and go home. He wanted to kill the competition, nothing more and he failed.
 
Dupe

 

Each side accused the other of being more interested in money than serving the public. OAKLAND, California May 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. jury on Monday ruled against Elon Musk in his lawsuit against OpenAI, finding the artificial intelligence company not liable to the world’s richest person for having allegedly strayed from its original mission to benefit humanity.​



In a unanimous verdict, the jury in Oakland, California federal court said Musk had brought his case too late.

The trial began on April 28. It has widely been seen as a critical moment for the future of OpenAI and artificial intelligence generally, both in how it should be used and who should benefit from it, including financially.

People use AI for myriad purposes such as education, facial recognition, financial advice, journalism, legal research, medical diagnoses, and harmful deep-fakes.

This was nothing more than Musk wanting to take ball and go home. He wanted to kill the competition, nothing more and he failed.

Thank you for the merge.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom