E. Jean Carroll is $5M richer

[DonGlock26]

No she didn't...

Nice misquote...

Please show the evidence (full interview) and you can see...

Trump's lawyer tried to pain that picture and was shut down...

8:58 on the video that I posted. Do you agree with her?

 

[CowboyTed]

So you agree that the only evidence against him was merely this crazy womans claim?

Carrol had other witnesses from the time but Trump was a full class idiot..

During his desposition:
When asked if he had made the statements in the Access Hollywood tape (e.g., "when you're a star, [beautiful women] let you do it. They let you do anything. ... grab 'em by the pussy"), Trump responded, "Well, historically, that's true with stars. If you look over the last million years, that's largely true, unfortunately or fortunately." He then agreed that he was such a "star"

Trump basically said he was allowed to assualt women, then pressed he justified it by saying he was a star...

He then said she wasn't his type while pointing at her while thinking it was his wife. It wasn't blurry.

 

[CowboyTed]

8:58 on the video that I posted. Do you agree with her?

What did she actually say?

She didn't say rape was sexy...

 

[DonGlock26]

Carrol had other witnesses from the time but Trump was a full class idiot..

During his desposition:
When asked if he had made the statements in the Access Hollywood tape (e.g., "when you're a star, [beautiful women] let you do it. They let you do anything. ... grab 'em by the pussy"), Trump responded, "Well, historically, that's true with stars. If you look over the last million years, that's largely true, unfortunately or fortunately." He then agreed that he was such a "star"

Trump basically said he was allowed to assualt women, then pressed he justified it by saying he was a star...

He then said she wasn't his type while pointing at her while thinking it was his wife. It wasn't blurry.

Did anyone witness the incident in question?

 

[Godboy]

Carrol had other witnesses from the time but Trump was a full class idiot..

During his desposition:
When asked if he had made the statements in the Access Hollywood tape (e.g., "when you're a star, [beautiful women] let you do it. They let you do anything. ... grab 'em by the pussy"), Trump responded, "Well, historically, that's true with stars. If you look over the last million years, that's largely true, unfortunately or fortunately." He then agreed that he was such a "star"

Trump basically said he was allowed to assualt women, then pressed he justified it by saying he was a star...

He then said she wasn't his type while pointing at her while thinking it was his wife. It wasn't blurry.

He said "they LET you do it". He isnt describing nonconsensual encounters. Right?

 

[DonGlock26]

What did she actually say?

She didn't say rape was sexy...

Did you even listen to the video?

 

[Godboy]

Did you even listen to the video?

He doesnt care.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The demented LEFT scraping the bottom of their narrative barrel.
It reminds me of the onslaught of gaslight theatre from our federal gov for the last four years, and the last four DECADES.

 

[CowboyTed]

Did anyone witness the incident in question?

You can't state your own evidence...

Nice try but shit don't fly...

Don't think murders can state what particular piece of evidence you have to have to convict... Doesn't work that way...

The jury heard the evidence and found him guilty. Did you personally hear all the evidence? I say not...
You got what you heard at best second hand from a biased media source... Verdict is what matters.

 

[DonGlock26]

You can't state your own evidence...

Nice try but shit don't fly...

Don't think murders can state what particular piece of evidence you have to have to convict... Doesn't work that way...

The jury heard the evidence and found him guilty. Did you personally hear all the evidence? I say not...
You got what you heard at best second hand from a biased media source... Verdict is what matters.

So, if you won't listen to this whack job, how can you claim to know what she said?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict​

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll's claim as a hoax.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-loses-appeal-e-jean-carroll-5-million-defamation-verdict-2024-12-30/

There's no doubt trump's court, if given the chance, will rule in his favor on appeal.

Amazing how jaded the legal system is. She wins a case with absolutely zero evidence, and when the accused tries to maintain innocence, he is sued for defaming someone who won a case against someone with zero evidence.


Here's the deal, that she won the case makes no difference in his ability to proclaim innocence, it's his right to do so. He still maintains that he didn't do it, and the court never proved that he did. They just assumed he could have because of the access Hollywood tape. There is still no evidence that the two ever met in bergdorf department store. But, since the court decided, on preponderence of evidence that it's possible he could have, for some reason, people think that you lose your right to defend yourself. You don't.

I would expect this case to make it to scotus soon.....either that, or I would sue e jean Carroll and force her to provide evidence of any interaction.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yet, those sucking Carroll’s dick vilify Tara Reade. The woman Joe Biden raped.

Why is that?

Because....democrat...

 

[ThisIsMe]

The case should act as a constant reminder of trump's moral degeneracy.

No, it should serve as a reminder that justice isn't blind.

 

[CowboyTed]

He doesnt care.

Yep...

She said that a she thinks 'most of people think rape is sexy, they think of the fantasies'... She never said she thought it is sexy.

She is clearly pointing out to idea of rape been made sexy by porn..

She clarified that a numer of times.

 

[Leo123]

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict​

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll's claim as a hoax.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-loses-appeal-e-jean-carroll-5-million-defamation-verdict-2024-12-30/

There's no doubt trump's court, if given the chance, will rule in his favor on appeal.

Another made up charge. They had no evidence of an actual rape so they had to go civil. This is after decades of Carroll saying nothing. No witnesses no evidence only 'he said she said.' The incident supposedly took place in 1996. The jury did not believe her claims of rape. Carroll could not remember the date the incident took place either. She waited 2 decades with her allegations.

IMO, since there is no real evidence, she waited 2 decades and couldn't remember when the incident took place, she is a liar and the Jury did not disseminate justice.

 

[Leo123]

Yep...

She said that a she thinks 'most of people think rape is sexy, they think of the fantasies'... She never said she thought it is sexy.

She is clearly pointing out to idea of rape been made sexy by porn..

She clarified that a numer of times.

'Most people' do not think rape is 'sexy.'

 

[ThisIsMe]

No kidding.

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll..........................................

What surprises me is how many judges are going along with this. This a clear cut case of injustice. This woman never proved a thing.

Are we now saying that if you make a statement randomly to a group of dudes 30 years ago, that someone can use that to accuse you of rape or serial assault and win? Even if there is zero evidence that it happened?


That's like "well, I heard John say how he wanted to whip the bosses ass"....then 30 years later, the boss is suing john...but doesn't have any evidence that the whooping ever took place.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The case should act as a constant reminder of trump's moral degeneracy.

Really? how many witnesses were there? None.

Did she report it to the police? No.

How many people did she inform about the incident at the time? None.

How can he be liable for an incident that didn't happen according to the legal system?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Keep pushing Reich Wing Propaganda, the Orange Shit Faced Liar LOST.

Not pushing anything, just looking for anything resembling evidence....

 

[Leo123]

What surprises me is how many judges are going along with this. This a clear cut case of injustice. This woman never proved a thing.

Are we now saying that if you make a statement randomly to a group of dudes 30 years ago, that someone can use that to accuse you of rape or serial assault and win? Even if there is zero evidence that it happened?


That's like "well, I heard John say how he wanted to whip the bosses ass"....then 30 years later, the boss is suing john...but doesn't have any evidence that the whooping ever took place.

It's in NY which has the most radical, leftist legal system funded by donations from George Soros.