E. Jean Carroll is $5M richer

[boevans]

This cased will be appealed again, findings sustained, and Trump to pay all court costs.

 

[Arlette]

Even when he loses there, he still won’t pay

So what? She got under his skin like nobody else.

 

[0311]

There is no proof that the 2 Carroll and Trump ever met, much less in a Manhattan Department Store dressing room.

Keep pushing Reich Wing Propaganda, the Orange Shit Faced Liar LOST.

 

[WEATHER53]

More mind reading that Trump Knew he was lying when he said she is lying

 

[0311]

That is what Trump said
I never met that woman

View attachment 1059520

Owing to the fact that Felon47 is a pathological liar, I would never have believed a word he said. The Court's have found him liable for the rape of Ms. Carroll. His problem he an overwhelming need NOT to be considered a loser, the fact is he lost.

 

[CrazyTrader55]

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict​

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll's claim as a hoax.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-loses-appeal-e-jean-carroll-5-million-defamation-verdict-2024-12-30/

There's no doubt trump's court, if given the chance, will rule in his favor on appeal.

Corrupt court gives $5 million in monopoly money to liar, nearly 30 years later. She will never collect a dime.

 

[jc456]

It can't be appealed?

never heard of SCOTUS?

 

[berg80]

Corrupt court gives $5 million in monopoly money to liar, nearly 30 years later. She will never collect a dime.

A federal appeals court has upheld a jury’s $5 million civil verdict against Donald Trump for sexual abuse and defamation claims brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll.

A three-judge panel ruled unanimously Monday that the trial judge did not violate Trump’s rights when he allowed Carroll to present evidence suggesting Trump had committed other sexual assaults. That evidence included Trump’s comments on the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape as well as testimony from other two other women who accused Trump of sexual assault.

“[T]he jury could reasonably infer … that Mr. Trump engaged in similar conduct with other women — a pattern of abrupt, nonconsensual, and physical advances on women he barely knew,” the panel wrote in a 77-page opinion. The judges ruling on the matter were Obama appointees Denny Chin and Susan Carney, as well as Biden appointee Myrna Perez.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/...-in-e-jean-carroll-sexual-abuse-case-00196116

Translation; it's not the only woman trump may have raped by the definition of rape by federal, not NY state, statute. Cuz.......you know........he's a serial sexual abuser of women.

 

[skews13]

This cased will be appealed again, findings sustained, and Trump to pay all court costs.

The Supreme Court isn't going to even take the case. Vacating a jury ruling is something any appeals court is hard pressed to do. Now that there has been an appeals ruling, that isn't going to be entertained any further.

 

[0311]

The Supreme Court isn't going to even take the case. Vacating a jury ruling is something any appeals court is hard pressed to do. Now that there has been an appeals ruling, that isn't going to be entertained any further.

There is this about SCOTUS taking the case, in reality won't happen and how many times did Felon47 lose at SCOTUS?

 

[Mister Iggy]

 

[Mister Iggy]

“rape is sexy”, good lord, what’s the real story of it all?

 

[Mister Iggy]

That is what Trump said
I never met that woman

View attachment 1059520

Impossible to remember everyone you meet at a party, when you are a celebrity and everyone is desperate to talk to you.

 

[berg80]

Mr. Trump now appeals, contending that the district court (Lewis A Kaplan, Judge) erred in several of its evidentiary rulings. These include its decisions to admit the testimony of two women who alleged that Mr. Trump sexually assaulted them in the past and to admit a recording of part of a 2005 conversation in which Mr. Trump described to another man how he kissed and grabbed women without first obtaining their consent. Mr. Trump contends that these and other asserted errors entitle him to a new trial. On review for abuse of discretion, we conclude that Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings. Further, he has not carried his burden to show that any claimed error or combination of claimed errors affected his substantial rights as required to warrant a new trial.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504.176.1.pdf

trump's record of sexual abuse was appropriately ruled to be admissible because this is a civil, not criminal, case.

 

[berg80]

This is going to make succeeding on further appeal problematic.

BACKGROUND

On appeal from a jury verdict, the court of appeals is bound to "construe all evidence, draw all inferences, and make all credibility determinations in favor of the party [who] prevailed before the jury." Jia Sheng v. M&TBank Corp., 848 F.3d 78, 81 (2d Cir. 2017) (quoting DiBella v. Hopkins, 403F.3d 102, 110 (2d Cir. 2005)). Here, that party is Ms. Carroll.

 

[BluesLegend]

No she isn't . The case is still being fought and appealed further. She hasn't collected the first 5 cents yet.

Dems don't let pesky facts get in the way of their lying.

 

[BluesLegend]

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan you say, shocker. When this hits the Trump SCOTUS it's DOA.

 

[Godboy]

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5 million defamation verdict​

NEW YORK, Dec 30 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a $5 million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.
The decision was issued by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.
The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll's claim as a hoax.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-loses-appeal-e-jean-carroll-5-million-defamation-verdict-2024-12-30/

There's no doubt trump's court, if given the chance, will rule in his favor on appeal.

Do you have a single reason to believe her story? Also, are there a number of reasons to NOT believe her?

 

[berg80]

Do you have a single reason to believe her story?

Yes. His track record as a sexual abuser of women as well as his track record as a pathological liar.

 

[Godboy]

Yes. His track record as a sexual abuser of women as well as his track record as a pathological liar.

So you dont have a single reason to believe HER story? Dont you see the problem here? Youre fine with a system that allows a mere claim with ZERO evidence to take millions from a guy? Nah, you dont want that system, right? You just want an exception for when its a political figure that you dont like.