E. Jean Carroll is $5M richer

[berg80]

Winning or losing a case in court, says nothing about whether Trump is "morally generate" or not.

But finger fucking Carroll and being credibly accused of sexual assault by 26 women, while admitting on tape he routinely assaults women sexually, does.

 

[ColonelAngus]

In a March 25, 2020, interview with Katie Halper, Reade alleged that Biden pushed her against a wall, kissed her, put his hand under her skirt, penetrated her with his fingers, and asked, "Do you want to go somewhere else?" Reade told National Public Radio (NPR) for an April 19 article, "His hands went underneath my clothing and he was touching me in my private areas and without my consent." Reade told The Intercept her impression was that Biden believed he had consent and was surprised when she rejected him.Reade told The New York Times for an April 12 article that when she pulled away from Biden, he looked puzzled and said, "Come on, man, I heard you liked me." She then said he told her "You're nothing to me, nothing", followed by "You're OK, you're fine".Reade told NPR she could not remember the exact place or date of the incident, stating it was likely a basement of a D.C. Senate office building in the spring of 1993.


#metoo

ISNT THAT CORRECT LEFTIES?

 

[Delldude]

This is a New York State Court

First sentence says federal court.

And she will collect through asset forfeiture if necessary.

Wrong case......

 

[ThisIsMe]

She described the incident in granular detail.

.she didn't remember what year it was, she claimed she was wearing a dress that hadn't even been made yet.

Still, anyone can fabricate a story and recite it "granular detail", being able to tell a story still requires proof. Of which she had none.

Then there was the bizarre behavior afterwards....

 

[rightwinger]

.she didn't remember what year it was, she claimed she was wearing a dress that hadn't even been made yet.

Still, anyone can fabricate a story and recite it "granular detail", being able to tell a story still requires proof. Of which she had none.

Then there was the bizarre behavior afterwards....

And Trumps memory was that he had never met her and that she wasn’t his type

Both disproven in court

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump doesn’t need to know her name. Does he care?
He knew her as John Johnson’s wife and wanted to grab her by the pussy

Lot smarter than you Skipper……At least I knew everyone in that picture

Show us the proof he wanted to grab her by tbr pussy?

Show us the proof that he did grab her by the pussy. Which if you can, that's great because you would have done something she did not.

 

[Delldude]

Still, anyone can fabricate a story and recite it "granular detail", being able to tell a story still requires proof. Of which she had none.

Blasey - Ford?

Then there was the bizarre behavior afterwards....

She has those crazy eyes like Walzs wife.

 

[rightwinger]

Show us the proof he wanted to grab her by tbr pussy?

Show us the proof that he did grab her by the pussy. Which if you can, that's great because you would have done something she did not.

Trump has bragged about grabbing women by the pussy. Other women testified Trump had done similar to them.
Carroll told her story of what happened that day.
Trump denied having met her and that “she is not my type”. Both disproved in court

Jury believed Carroll

 

[ThisIsMe]

And his confession on the bus...

He then backs it up h=in his deposition...

He said he is allowed to sexually assault women because he is a 'Star'...

What confession on the bus? He confessed to serial abuse of carroll?

He never said he is allowed to sexually abuse women, he said they LET him grab them. That would seem to indicate that they are not resistant. If someone let's you do something, what does that mean? Some women are attracted to celebrity status people, some women even throw themselves at them.

Still, it was locker room talk, nobody has ever proven that trump sexually abused any of those women.

All I've ever been asking for is, where's the proof..

 

[Delldude]

Girlfriend has a cat..... gonna grab her pussy......

 

[ThisIsMe]

Bill Clinton got away with citing the statute of limitations when he was accused of rape. President elect Trump has to deal with a hostile rigged NY judicial system about a alleged incident that occurred 30 years ago. Don't spend the 5 million too soon Ms. Carroll

Yeah, it's kind of weird how ny came up with the adult survivors act, right around the time this all.came up.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She made her claim, went to court and proved it to a jury...

Since no one here was on the jury and only got their information from there media bubble, I am going with the jury.

Trump took his opportunity to appeal and not only lost but scorned by the judges in the case.

We know you want a law that makes Trump not guilty even if does something wrong...

Lets make it clear, the rest of the world can't seem to understand how Trump was not criminally convicted for the laws he broke. The evidence was clear but US Justice system seems to favour the rich and powerful even if there is ample proof that he broke the law.
What do other countries think when they see a corrupt guy like Trump as leader of US?

Nope, I don't expect trump to be able to be above the law, not at all. All I want is proof, and for the left to stop their lawfare bs. All.if the cases against trump all have weird stuff surrounding them. Like the NY falsified records, which bragg had to fabricate to get a conviction.

Then the property value case where apparently nobody has been charged or convicted of that statute

 

[Delldude]

Bill Clinton got away with citing the statute of limitations when he was accused of rape.

That's hard to believe......

Jones filed a sexual harassment suit against Clinton on May 6, 1994, two days before the expiration of the three-year statute of limitations.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It was proven to a jury
That is what matters

Do you ever get tired of being humiliated Skipper?

Lol, nobody is being humiliated. You leftys just don't care about "justice", unless it's against your enemy. Otherwise you'd see this case as injustice.

You would also have believed Tara reade....remember, all women deserve to be believed, right? Except not when they accused Biden, THEN she needs to be trashed and humiliated, right?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yea…yea
Heard it all before

The jury hated me, the DA was crooked, the judge was against me

Every criminal cries the same thing

Except we know this is true, as evidenced by Letitia James making a campaign promise to sue trump...for...something...and then going home, and then every left wing that stated their desire to."get trump"

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump has bragged about grabbing women by the pussy. Other women testified Trump had done similar to them.
Carroll told her story of what happened that day.
Trump denied having met her and that “she is not my type”. Both disproved in court

Jury believed Carroll

and you call that justice? Then why weren't you calling for Tara reade to be vindicated?

Accordomg.to you, any woman can accused a man, have.absolutley no proof, and she will win.

The fact that he said women let him grab them isn't evidence that he grabbed her or touched her in any way. The only way that should have been decided is if she had an eye witness, a security camera recording, a rape test with dna, even a police report with an investigation.

But using "he said this statement so that means he raped me 30 years ago" is not evidence.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Blasey - Ford?


She has those crazy eyes like Walzs wife.

She said some weird stuff. Like tweeting people asking if they would have sex with trump for $17,000...an oddly specific amount, for some reason, and then the interviews after the verdict in this case.

 

[Polishprince]

But finger fucking Carroll and being credibly accused of sexual assault by 26 women, while admitting on tape he routinely assaults women sexually, does.

The only problem with your hypothesis is that it never happened.

President Trump admitted it.

Further, the video that you are referring to is a routine that Trump was auditioning, just bullshitting between him and Billy Bush not a "confession". And Trump's point was that there are a lot of broads who like to have relations with celebrities.

 

[berg80]

being able to tell a story still requires proof. Of which she had none.

Given the circumstances of the incident, the two alone in a dressing room, and the amount of time that's passed since it happened, what proof can she offer?
The jury found her story to be credible. In large part because what she accused the Orange Menace of doing is consistent with what he admitted he did on a routine basis on tape.

 

[rightwinger]

Nope, I don't expect trump to be able to be above the law, not at all. All I want is proof, and for the left to stop their lawfare bs. All.if the cases against trump all have weird stuff surrounding them. Like the NY falsified records, which bragg had to fabricate to get a conviction.

Then the property value case where apparently nobody has been charged or convicted of that statute

Trump was sued not because he sexually assaulted Carroll. He was sued for defamation. Trump denying that he did it is not defamation. His personal attacks on Carroll were. $5 million Donnie

Trump was warned by the Judge to STFU. He was warned by his attorneys to STFU
But Trump continued with the personal attacks. Carroll was harassed and threatened by Trump supporters. She sued again and was awarded $83 million

Once again it is Trumps inability to control himself that cost him Bigly