Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
E. Jean Carroll has asked a judge to amend her initial defamation case against former President Donald Trump to seek additional punitive damages after he repeated his statements at a CNN town hall.
The request was made in a letter to the judge seeking clarity on the initial lawsuit following the jury verdict earlier this month finding Trump sexually abused Carroll and awarding her $5 million.
Carroll’s attorneys said Trump’s defamatory statements repeated during the town hall earlier this month go directly to the issue of punitive damages, which are intended to punish the person found liable.
Carroll’s initial lawsuit was held up on appeal and relates to statements Trump made in 2019 while he was president. The trial involved a statement Trump made in 2022.
It is a seperate case that has not been adjudicated.I doubt if that will fly, unless trump appeals to change settlement. Then I suppose it could go either way, but I figure that would be a different judge.
Don't you watch Fox news, dumbass. The evidence and the verdict was explained.Where's the evidence?
Where is the evidence of a sexual assault you claimed happened?Don't you watch Fox news, dumbass. The evidence and the verdict was explained.
Yes there was:
Clearly you don't know anything about the 1st Amendment.
She won a settlement in front of a corrupt judge and a hand-picked jury.
If he has to, he'll take this pack of lies to the Supreme Court and get it overturned.
She claimed he raped her yet she can't nail down an exact date when it happened.
So it's just her word against his.
The jury said most likely it wasn't rape.
So basically the jury thinks she's a liar.
They literally had to change a state law to make it possible for her to sue him in the first place.
She said he said is not evidence
Immaterial to the point being made... Trump creates his own problems... then tries blaming everyone but himself... four years of that was quite enough.Interesting that E. Jean Carroll's big mouth doesn't figure in your declaration.
![]()
Funny that you inferred "creation" as this sad episode of terminal TDS was MADE UP FICTION!!!!Immaterial to the point being made... Trump creates his own problems... then tries blaming everyone but himself... four years of that was quite enough.
Its still she said he said people lie under oath Blasey FordTestimony under oath is evidence.
The date and the ruling were the date and the ruling. The jury has gone home. That one is over, unless Trump appeals. She is free to file a new one.
No a good tactic is doxing her address let nature take its course. Democrats do that so very well.Pretty good tactic to keep him from appealing, no?
Sux having to defend your hero from such a damning evidence-laden and legally untenable position, doesn't it?Funny that you inferred "creation" as this sad episode of terminal TDS was MADE UP FICTION!!!!
A CREATION of deceitful made up BULLSHIT!!!!
It's no surprise that you eat that roadkill pile of mangled reality Mr. Carrion Crow.
![]()
Trump and Brett Kavanagh double teamed Christine Ballsey Ford and E. Jean Caroll by the punch bowl.Sux having to defend your hero from such a damning evidence-laden and legally untenable position, doesn't it?
Had you been supporting anyone other than a Benedict Arnold or Judas Iscaiot type, such as you are, I would have extended my sympathies for the morass.
But... when you lie down with dogs, yer gonna git fleas... such as those you carry now... and, on reflection, I suppose I can spare a little pity for you-and-yours.
Where is the evidence of a sexual assault you claimed happened?
Again where is the physical evidence that a crime of sexual assault happened?Hint: Go find the trial transcript. Read it. Report back.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From today's news bullet-point feed:
"E. Jean Carroll filed for more damages from Donald Trump yesterday.
- A reminder: Carroll, a writer, won a $5 million judgment against the former president in a civil sexual assault and defamation case earlier this month.
- What’s new? She is seeking damages from Trump for disparaging comments he made about her during his recent CNN town hall event.
- Today: Trump will appear remotely in a Manhattan courtroom for a pretrial hearing in a separate criminal case."
Again where is the physical evidence that a crime of sexual assault happened?
You keep saying there is evidence where is it? None was produced just her word. She said he said.Again, go find the trial transcript.
Read it.
Report back.
.She's a money grubber and there's no consequences for filing frivolous lawsuits so kind of expected, no?![]()