E. Jean Carroll asks judge to amend lawsuit to seek further damages for what Trump said at CNN town hall

[ElmerMudd]

Where is the evidence of a sexual assault you claimed happened?

Not sexual assault. liable for battery and defamation of E. Jean Carroll,
let me help you out with understanding.
What battery means in law?
Battery is an unlawful application of force directly or indirectly upon another person or their personal belongings, causing bodily injury or offensive contact. The attempt of battery is assault.

 

[ElmerMudd]

She said he said is not evidence

You do not have a clue about the US judicial system.
“the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury.”
The jury of your peers decides if the evidence is strong enough for someone to be guilty. Beyond a shadow of a doubt in a criminal trial and by a preponderance of the evidence in a civil trial.

Some dumbass on the US Message board does not decide. Not some government employee or any other independent citizen.
How far did you go in school?

 

[bripat9643]

He con-tinued to defame her....basically spitting on the judge and jury and their finding.

They deserve to be spit on.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Better yet look what he has done to you loons. Rank democrat leaders made up the russian collusion hoax to try to take down an elected president. You people are crazy.

Was never really necessary. He was always going to do it to himself.
Trump’s about to be indicted again. Imminently.
Then again.
And yet again.

 

[White 6]

He said nearly the exact same shit that he was already found libel for. How could it not fly?

You can sue anybody for anything, and if you get in front of a jury, with a good lawyer, you might win. She can sue him again, and might win again. It is up to her, but she won't win twice, without going to court twice.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That's okay. She's already been paid by the DNC and her lawyer's fees have been comped.

What whiny, weak victims you “alphas” have become.

 

[jknowgood]

Was never really necessary. He was always going to do it to himself.
Trump’s about to be indicted again. Imminently.
Then again.
And yet again.

Yes I know, a corrupt government will take out the person they fear the most. The fbi motto, show me the man and I'll show you the crime.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes I know, a corrupt government will take out the person they fear the most. The fbi motto, show me the man and I'll show you the crime.

More victimization? Such a fragile snowflake.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Not sexual assault. liable for battery and defamation of E. Jean Carroll,
let me help you out with understanding.
What battery means in law?
Battery is an unlawful application of force directly or indirectly upon another person or their personal belongings, causing bodily injury or offensive contact. The attempt of battery is assault.

Ok where is the evidence of battery?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You do not have a clue about the US judicial system.
“the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury.”
The jury of your peers decides if the evidence is strong enough for someone to be guilty. Beyond a shadow of a doubt in a criminal trial and by a preponderance of the evidence in a civil trial.

Some dumbass on the US Message board does not decide. Not some government employee or any other independent citizen.
How far did you go in school?

You don't have a clue. Where is that thing called physical evidence

 

[ElmerMudd]

They deserve to be spit on.

Those who spit on our justice system are unAmerican.
The US has dealt with traitors, like you, throughout history. Our country has always won because of the strength of our system. Our judicial system is an important part of that system. It will take you and others like you, down.

 

[ElmerMudd]

You don't have a clue. Where is that thing called physical evidence

You idiot. All trials include more than just physical evidence.
That evidence is weighed by a jury of your peers. They decide if there is a preponderance of the evidence, all evidence, shows the defendant guilty of the accusations in a civil case.

It is doubtful that Trump could have been founnd guilty in a criminal trial; beyond a shadow of a doubt.

In future criminal cases you will see physical evidence, I predict, of Trump being guilty of multiple crimes.

 

[j-mac]

You idiot. All trials include more than just physical evidence.
That evidence is weighed by a jury of your peers. They decide if there is a preponderance of the evidence, all evidence, shows the defendant guilty of the accusations in a civil case.

It is doubtful that Trump could have been founnd guilty in a criminal trial; beyond a shadow of a doubt.

In future criminal cases you will see physical evidence, I predict, of Trump being guilty of multiple crimes.

So, they had a jury of Billionaires, and real estate moguls? No

What they had was a totally biased jury, of a corrupt civil court, in a completely one sided liberal shithole….

Im still wondering what Trump said that was defamatory…? The OP article doesn’t say…

 

[mudwhistle]

You do not have a clue about the US judicial system.
“the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury.”
The jury of your peers decides if the evidence is strong enough for someone to be guilty. Beyond a shadow of a doubt in a criminal trial and by a preponderance of the evidence in a civil trial.

Some dumbass on the US Message board does not decide. Not some government employee or any other independent citizen.
How far did you go in school?

So they found 12 billionaires to fill the jury, because that would be Trump's peers?
Not a bunch of asshole Democrats that hate rich straight white males.

 

[Chillicothe]

What they had was a totally biased jury, of a corrupt civil court, in a completely one sided liberal shithole….

Prove it.
Don't be a keyboard blowhard who makes claims that you will not, or cannot, back up.
A man's word need be his bond in the real world of adult life and adult responsibility.
So do it.
Prove to the forum that this was a "biased" jury. Talk to us about the voir dire process of the opposing attorneys in this case.
Prove to the forum that this was a "corrupt" civil court. Show us what you've got to back up your word. Show us charges, subpoenas, convictions, disciplinary actions, etc.

Saddle up, Skippy. Show us what your little pony can do.

Giddyup!

 

[mudwhistle]

What whiny, weak victims you “alphas” have become.

What a bunch of evil bastards you leftists have become.
It's clear you don't believe in the truth or justice.
You claim we're trying to destroy democracy all the while you rig elections so that democracy becomes only a memory.
You prefer candidates that cannot think for themselves and then arrest their opponents on trumped up charges using lies and doctored evidence.
What's the point of campaigning anymore.
You use Dominion machines to change election results and you put BLM members in the counting rooms.
You support the criminal while attacking their victims.
Fucking Nazi bastards.

 

[ElmerMudd]

So, they had a jury of Billionaires, and real estate moguls? No

What they had was a totally biased jury, of a corrupt civil court, in a completely one sided liberal shithole….

Im still wondering what Trump said that was defamatory…? The OP article doesn’t say…

A jury of Donald Trump's peers should include com men, business people who have declared bankruptcy, adulterers, men who have 5 kids by 3 wives, men who brag about grabbing women by the pussy.

Do you know how a jury is chosen?
The lawyers from both sides determine the jury. Trump's lawyers have strong input on the jury selection. If a jury can be shown to be bias, a mistrial can be called.
But some dumbass on this site does not determine the validity of a jury.

 

[Chillicothe]

You use Dominion machines to change election results and you put BLM members in the counting rooms.

Prove it.
Don't be a crybaby whiner. A MAGASnowflake.
It's a bad look.
An unmanly look.
It's a look that some would say 'Karens' own.
Or, if you are a male, then 'Dicks' own.

Man up, and prove your allegations.
It's the responsible adult thing to do.

 

[ElmerMudd]

So they found 12 billionaires to fill the jury, because that would be Trump's peers?
Not a bunch of asshole Democrats that hate rich straight white males.

A jury of Donald Trump's peers should include con men, business people who have declared bankruptcy, adulterers, men who have 5 kids by 3 wives, men who brag about grabbing women by the pussy.

 

[mudwhistle]

A jury of Donald Trump's peers should include con men, business people who have declared bankruptcy, adulterers, men who have 5 kids by 3 wives, men who brag about grabbing women by the pussy.

How about pedophiles and people who never held a decent job in their lives, and jammed their fingers up their secretary's pussy and force female Secret Service agents to watch them while they swim in the nude.
12 Joe Bidens would do the job.