Dump Trump at Convention

While the GOP would really like to do this, it will lose them the election, no matter who they run in Trumps place. However, it may save some down ticket seats. As is, if those down ticket endorse Trump, they are cutting their own throats. And, if they don't, they are cutting their own throats. The GOP has put itself in an amazingly unique position.
 
While the GOP would really like to do this, it will lose them the election, no matter who they run in Trumps place. However, it may save some down ticket seats. As is, if those down ticket endorse Trump, they are cutting their own throats. And, if they don't, they are cutting their own throats. The GOP has put itself in an amazingly unique position.

The amazingly unique position of nominating a hugely popular, although polarizing, candidate. The SJW's on universities across America have pushed so far, there is a grassroots, populist uprising that is not even motivated solely, or chiefly by policy. Trump's support for enforcing the law resonated. It resonated because polls have consistently shown a plurality of Americans support immigration law enforcement. The GOP establishment were lock-step with the left on immigration. Trump's rise is much more to do with culture than policy.

Go ahead and continue believing Trump is just a aberration, talk to me in November.
 
A few Republicans are still hoping there's a magic pony -- someone besides Trump -- in the pile of manure.

Nope, sorry, it's just a pile of manure.
Mammies never learns ...at the Convention....

ehBte9O.gif
 
While the GOP would really like to do this, it will lose them the election, no matter who they run in Trumps place. However, it may save some down ticket seats. As is, if those down ticket endorse Trump, they are cutting their own throats. And, if they don't, they are cutting their own throats. The GOP has put itself in an amazingly unique position.

I travel a lot of comment sections on boards. Here's the deal I'm seeing and you can see it even with the posters at the Daily Mail UK. This is buzzing every where.

The plan is this. If the Never Trump crowd fuck over Trump at the convention the Trump supporters will still go out en masse and write Trump in and then they'll go straight down and vote a solid Democrat ticket.

Not kidding. Solid D. They will punish Congress and the Senate big time and hand them over to the Democrats.

They will destroy the Republican Party. Good plan eh?
 
obama endorsed Clinton. That means she lost. No candidate he endorsed has ever been elected.

It will be President Trump. Whether the RNC embraces reality or Trump is the first write in candidate to ever be elected is the only question.
 
David French repeats a little know fact about delegates freedom to choose at the Convention:

Not a Single Republican Delegate Is ‘Bound’ to Donald Trump, by David French, National Review
It ain't happening, moron.

That's the bottom line.

Correct. You would rather see Hillary Clinton become president

You hate Trump. We know that. But check RCP. Only one poll has him 8 points back of Hillary. The other three are in the margin of error. He's come a long way in this fight and he's not even started in on her yet.

Don't know who you were rooting for and I'm sorry as can be that your candidate didn't make it, but the only one that can take her out is Trump. And that shows in the numbers he's brought in during the primaries.

More votes for Trump in a primary in over thirty years. He even got more votes that GW who didn't have any competition for crying out loud.
 
David French repeats a little know fact about delegates freedom to choose at the Convention:

Not a Single Republican Delegate Is ‘Bound’ to Donald Trump, by David French, National Review

A political party is its own organization; it can do anything it wants. There ain't nothing legally binding in primary elections -- those are in effect recommendations for who the candidate should be. If the party as a whole decides those recommendations are suicidal, it can (and should) disregard them and nominate whoever it wants to nominate.

Like it did in 1912 when a bloviant from New York, dismissed as an egomaniac by his detractors, swept through a slew of primary wins by large margins. The RP decided he wasn't the ideal choice and ran the Establishment guy from Ohio.
 
obama endorsed Clinton. That means she lost. No candidate he endorsed has ever been elected.

It will be President Trump. Whether the RNC embraces reality or Trump is the first write in candidate to ever be elected is the only question.

See my post #14. :) The buzz could make this an election to never be forgotten.
 
David French repeats a little know fact about delegates freedom to choose at the Convention:

Not a Single Republican Delegate Is ‘Bound’ to Donald Trump, by David French, National Review

A political party is its own organization; it can do anything it wants. There ain't nothing legally binding in primary elections -- those are in effect recommendations for who the candidate should be. If the party as a whole decides those recommendations are suicidal, it can (and should) disregard them and nominate whoever it wants to nominate.

Like it did in 1912 when a bloviant from New York, dismissed as an egomaniac by his detractors, swept through a slew of primary wins by large margins. The RP decided he wasn't the ideal choice and ran the Establishment guy from Ohio.

And they'll sign their own death certificate.
 
obama endorsed Clinton. That means she lost. No candidate he endorsed has ever been elected.

It will be President Trump. Whether the RNC embraces reality or Trump is the first write in candidate to ever be elected is the only question.

Strom Thurmond was write-in (re-)elected to the Senate in 1952 after the SC Democratic Party kicked him off the ballot.
That takes a whole lot of lockstep mentality to get done. Rump isn't even close to that kind of lockstep except with his zombies --- not with the general public.
 

Forum List

Back
Top