Dozens of protesters arrested on Bay Bridge

Should simply drive through them with dump trucks.

With one of these mounted on the front.
1700206294983.png
 
The following post is me not taking a side. But addressing this with an open mind and seeing things from an "outside the box" perspective. It's commonly referred to as

Protesting is a first Amendment right. One that we all might need at some point. It's extremely important to a free society, And one that I completely support.

BUT, people like this are going to force the government to stop allowing protests.
Wait, did I just say that? "The government to stop allowing protests?" If that's the case, then it's not really a right, is it?

Maybe we're all just assuming we have a "right" to protest. Maybe we've been fed a load of crap about our actual rights. Maybe they allow us to do it when it doesn't disrupt too much. Like the 1/6 protest. Or the BLM protests.
Personally, I think it's actually been a privilege this whole time, and not an actual right.

These people on the bridge were arrested for protesting. The people in the capital were arrested for protesting. (some were justifiably arrested for assault. But I'm referring to the ones who didn't assault anyone, didn't destroy any property).

In the end, it's going to be "we the people" who will give the government the justification for abolishing protesting in this country. It's things like this that makes me think those who were violently protesting and those that got out of hand (1/6 and BLM) should've been Rittenhoused by us citizens. Because ultimately, that would've been fighting for freedom. Because the violent protesters of 1/6, BLM and antifa didn't give a crap about the freedoms they were destroying in this country.

P.S. There's a LOT of things that Americans can't do now a days, because citizens went to far. Like carrying a gun in a gun rack to school. Having an automatic weapon. Hauling freight without a CDL and a log book.
 
They're finally starting to arrest those road blocking protesters here in the USA. Good. I prefer a much harsher punishment. But it's San Francisco, sooooo who cares. They voted for the leftist radical environment. They kind of deserve it.




They can't just arrest, they have to follow through with prosecuting them for the violations they committed. No wrist slaps.

Civil Disobedience is meaningless if you don't suffer the penalties for your disobedience.
 
The following post is me not taking a side. But addressing this with an open mind and seeing things from an "outside the box" perspective. It's commonly referred to as

Protesting is a first Amendment right. One that we all might need at some point. It's extremely important to a free society, And one that I completely support.

BUT, people like this are going to force the government to stop allowing protests.
Wait, did I just say that? "The government to stop allowing protests?" If that's the case, then it's not really a right, is it?

Maybe we're all just assuming we have a "right" to protest. Maybe we've been fed a load of crap about our actual rights. Maybe they allow us to do it when it doesn't disrupt too much. Like the 1/6 protest. Or the BLM protests.
Personally, I think it's actually been a privilege this whole time, and not an actual right.

These people on the bridge were arrested for protesting. The people in the capital were arrested for protesting. (some were justifiably arrested for assault. But I'm referring to the ones who didn't assault anyone, didn't destroy any property).

In the end, it's going to be "we the people" who will give the government the justification for abolishing protesting in this country. It's things like this that makes me think those who were violently protesting and those that got out of hand (1/6 and BLM) should've been Rittenhoused by us citizens. Because ultimately, that would've been fighting for freedom. Because the violent protesters of 1/6, BLM and antifa didn't give a crap about the freedoms they were destroying in this country.

P.S. There's a LOT of things that Americans can't do now a days, because citizens went to far. Like carrying a gun in a gun rack to school. Having an automatic weapon. Hauling freight without a CDL and a log book.
Pretty good post!
 
Some people here seem to be confused as to the difference between the right to protest and the actions undertaken in that regard.

How silly to call the reactions to these idiots fascist when the genocidal Islamist cause they are supporting represents one of the most vicious examples thereof.
 
Why is this kind of "protesting" a First Amendment right? May I block your driveway and prevent you from going to work?
 
The following post is me not taking a side. But addressing this with an open mind and seeing things from an "outside the box" perspective. It's commonly referred to as

Protesting is a first Amendment right. One that we all might need at some point. It's extremely important to a free society, And one that I completely support.

BUT, people like this are going to force the government to stop allowing protests.
Wait, did I just say that? "The government to stop allowing protests?" If that's the case, then it's not really a right, is it?

Maybe we're all just assuming we have a "right" to protest. Maybe we've been fed a load of crap about our actual rights. Maybe they allow us to do it when it doesn't disrupt too much. Like the 1/6 protest. Or the BLM protests.
Personally, I think it's actually been a privilege this whole time, and not an actual right.

These people on the bridge were arrested for protesting. The people in the capital were arrested for protesting. (some were justifiably arrested for assault. But I'm referring to the ones who didn't assault anyone, didn't destroy any property).

In the end, it's going to be "we the people" who will give the government the justification for abolishing protesting in this country. It's things like this that makes me think those who were violently protesting and those that got out of hand (1/6 and BLM) should've been Rittenhoused by us citizens. Because ultimately, that would've been fighting for freedom. Because the violent protesters of 1/6, BLM and antifa didn't give a crap about the freedoms they were destroying in this country.

P.S. There's a LOT of things that Americans can't do now a days, because citizens went to far. Like carrying a gun in a gun rack to school. Having an automatic weapon. Hauling freight without a CDL and a log book.
I came to that conclusion a long, long time ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top