Don't shop at Dick's (Sports).. they are covering cost of travel for women who want to abort

[Faun]

Thanks for letting me know...will check and if true I will most definitely shop there.

Here ya go...

Amazon
Amalgamated Bank
Apple
Bumble
Citigroup
Chobani
Comcast
Dick’s Sporting Goods
Disney
DoorDash
HP Enterprise
Hims & Hers
Interpublic Group, Publicis Groupe and WPP
Levi Strauss & Co
Lyft
Match Group
Meta
Microsoft
Netflix
Paramount
Patagonia
Power Home Remodeling
Reddit
Salesforce
Starbucks
Tesla
United Talent Agency
Yelp
Zillow

You'll note, Amazon, Apple, HP & Microsoft are all on that list. For many of our resident rightards to boycott these companies means they can't use the tools needed to post here.

We'll see just how many of them actually have the stones to stand up for their convictions and actually boycott them.

I predict none will.

 

[citygator]

LOL

Go throw your money in a hole...........I don't give a shit............

I do it on things like a pool. Which is a dang money hole.........but Last I looked the pool wasn't saying we will drive you to kill your baby.

Witty. Enjoy your above ground pool behind your trailer while Lauren Hutton leads an amazing organization forward.

 

[citygator]

I've stated before that your right to abortion should end at viability, it doesn't help your argument that you have lie about it so much.

Are you a doctor? When is that not a good idea and which court or non doctor should decide your wife should die due to a viable fetus?

 

[SweetSue92]

First to clarify, I have no problem with assisted suicide. If people want to end their own lives they should be able to. If we're talking scientific differences well only one, the fetus, has to live inside another human being. If a spouse or child doesn't want to take care of an elderly person, willing people, and the state, if the citizens are willing, can step in and do it for them. We can't step in and develope the fetus for unwilling mothers, we can only force them, by law, to nurture that fetus against their will.

That's the life you're living, regardless of the fairytale you believe in. You have no God given rights, only rights protected by the State.

If there's only one difference, and you are for ending a fetus' life because they're not self-sustaining and inconvenient, then I guess we can decide to end the lives of sick/elderly too. Save a lot of resources/time/energy. What's the argument against it? From your secularist hell perspective. There is none.

Your hell. We would have to live in it, if it were actually reality.

 

[SweetSue92]

Witty. Enjoy your above ground pool behind your trailer while Lauren Hutton leads an amazing organization forward.

Hold on you're a liberal right? And here I thought liberals were "for the little guy" and always looking out for the poor rather than acting like insufferable snobs.

 

[initforme]

Never been in one but I must say I'd never let a company's benefits affect my shopping there. If I need some there I AM going to shop there. It's all about convenience over politics for me

 

[citygator]

Here ya go...

Amazon
Amalgamated Bank
Apple
Bumble
Citigroup
Chobani
Dick’s Sporting Goods
Disney
DoorDash
Hims & Hers
Interpublic Group, Publicis Groupe and WPP
Levi Strauss & Co
Lyft
Match Group
Microsoft
Netflix
Patagonia
Power Home Remodeling
Salesforce
Starbucks
Tesla
United Talent Agency
Yelp
Zillow

You'll note, Amazon, Apple & Microsoft are all on that list. For many of our resident rightards to boycott these companies means they can't use the tools needed to post here.

We'll see just how many of them actually have the stones to stand up for their convictions and actually boycott them.

I predict none will.

Better yet. Here is who not to support.

If women want their power back they HAVE to stop doing business with any company supporting Republicans. There is no other path.

Home Depot General Dynamics, Motorola Solutions, FedEx, and Tyson Foods

Look at All These Companies Bankrolling Republican Jan. 6 Apologists

Exclusive: A slew of Fortune 500 companies have donated millions to Republicans who voted to overturn the 2020 election results.

www.vice.com

 

[SweetSue92]

Here ya go...

Amazon
Amalgamated Bank
Apple
Bumble
Citigroup
Chobani
Dick’s Sporting Goods
Disney
DoorDash
Hims & Hers
Interpublic Group, Publicis Groupe and WPP
Levi Strauss & Co
Lyft
Match Group
Microsoft
Netflix
Patagonia
Power Home Remodeling
Salesforce
Starbucks
Tesla
United Talent Agency
Yelp
Zillow

You'll note, Amazon, Apple & Microsoft are all on that list. For many of our resident rightards to boycott these companies means they can't use the tools needed to post here.

We'll see just how many of them actually have the stones to stand up for their convictions and actually boycott them.

I predict none will.

I don't intend to boycott a single one. Not one. I don't have to do anything--just wait for the Leftists to work themselves in a frenzy (already happening, not 24 hours in) and then watch the Abortion Tourism bloom. It will just be too much of a draw for some the mentally ill among you. Get pg, and then on the company dime, travel, hotel, abortion. Put it all on social media. Lots of props.

It's sick. It WILL repulse normal people.

And it will happen. Mark my words.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Hold on you're a liberal right? And here I thought liberals were "for the little guy" and always looking out for the poor rather than acting like insufferable snobs.

That clown is no liberal. Progtard maybe

 

[eagle1462010]

Witty. Enjoy your above ground pool behind your trailer while Lauren Hutton leads an amazing organization forward.

Sure will. Mr LANGLEY. How is the weather today in Virginia?

 

[Curried Goats]

Are you a doctor? When is that not a good idea and which court or non doctor should decide your wife should die due to a viable fetus?

I know plenty of doctors. A pediatrician, a pediatric surgeon, and a neo-natal specialist. My uncle and two of his kids. (I'm related to more doctors those are just the ones that specifically deal with children) Sure, I'd trust their judgment.

 

[initforme]

Rather than provide cost of transportation wouldn't it be alot better if they gave free plan b to all their female employees? Makes sense.

 

[Faun]

Who shopped at Dicks?

C'mon, Fruitcake, you love dicks. Who do you think you're fooling?

 

[SweetSue92]

I know plenty of doctors. A pediatrician, a pediatric surgeon, and a neo-natal specialist. My uncle and two of his kids. (I'm related to more doctors those are just the ones that specifically deal with children) Sure, I'd trust their judgment.

I appreciate that you recognize viability. But imagine you have a family member in the hospital for a severe infection. They put him on IV antibiotics but remove the antibiotics after two days. The course is 7 days of IV antibiotics. They say "At this time the infection is severe". You would say, RIGHTLY, if the medication is allowed to run its course the patient would in all likelihood be cured.

So it is with human development. A fetus that is not "viable" is not a stagnant condition. It's immoral to make that diagnosis as a reason to abort. It's not a perpetual condition.

 

[Curried Goats]

If there's only one difference, and you are for ending a fetus' life because they're not self-sustaining and inconvenient, then I guess we can decide to end the lives of sick/elderly too. Save a lot of resources/time/energy. What's the argument against it? From your secularist hell perspective. There is none.

In the case of a disabled old person where no loved ones and no one in society was willing to care for them I wouldn't have any problem with their natural death. Sure, save the money and resources. I don't have a ethical stance against it, I just see it as a bad position to take, politically speaking.

Your hell. We would have to live in it, if it were actually reality.

It is reality. Everything else is a fairytale.

 

[Curried Goats]

I appreciate that you recognize viability. But imagine you have a family member in the hospital for a severe infection. They put him on IV antibiotics but remove the antibiotics after two days. The course is 7 days of IV antibiotics. They say "At this time the infection is severe". You would say, RIGHTLY, if the medication is allowed to run its course the patient would in all likelihood be cured.

So it is with human development. A fetus that is not "viable" is not a stagnant condition. It's immoral to make that diagnosis as a reason to abort. It's not a perpetual condition.

Me receiving antibiotics isn't the same as me gestating inside an unwilling human being.

 

[Faun]

Exactly. I never shopped at overpriced Dick's. I certainly won't now.

So no loss or impact at all to their business. Yeah, that'll show them.

 

[SweetSue92]

In the case of a disabled old person where no loved ones and no one in society was willing to care for them I wouldn't have any problem with their natural death. Sure, save the money and resources. I don't have a ethical stance against it, I just see it as a bad position to take, politically speaking.

It is reality. Everything else is a fairytale.

Abortion is not a natural death. I'm not talking about a natural death here. If you argument regarding abortion is that they're not "viable"--well, plenty of elderly and sick people are also not "viable" without significant support, resources and money. No, not natural death. Off them, just like we abort babies. You should be fine with this. Euthanize them. It would be less painful for them than pulling babies' limbs apart in the womb.

 

[SweetSue92]

Me receiving antibiotics isn't the same as me gestating inside an unwilling human being.

What do you mean "unwilling"? Very few mothers are raped. Most mothers copulate willingly and then just don't like the results--and make the baby pay.

And now, our God-forsaken nation (I mean that) is going around screeching about losing our "rights". Our rights to kill our own children!

 

[SweetSue92]

Me receiving antibiotics isn't the same as me gestating inside an unwilling human being.

And by the way, it's the same argument. It's not letting nature/a treatment take its course, and then acting as if the snapshot in time is perpetual. So it must be morally okay.