Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
What I know, is that you would not be saying what you are saying Billy K, if you actually took the time and read the report, even a portion of the report in each Part, 1 and 2.We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
No, you just sound crazy, having done what you claim others have done. You know nothing you have not been told, while rejecting the obvious.
What I know, is that you would not be saying what you are saying Billy K, if you actually took the time and read the report, even a portion of the report in each Part, 1 and 2.We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
No, you just sound crazy, having done what you claim others have done. You know nothing you have not been told, while rejecting the obvious.
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?
Barr didn't even read the report,
You dont have any facts,In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?Barr didn't even read the report,
Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.
The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.
how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?Barr didn't even read the report,
Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.
The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.
how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?
He admitted it to Congress. They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence given by Mueller's report before making his statement that there was no collusion or obstruction.
Barr says he didn't review underlying evidence of Mueller report before making obstruction call
In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?Barr didn't even read the report,
Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.
The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.
how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?
He admitted it to Congress. They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence given by Mueller's report before making his statement that there was no collusion or obstruction.
Barr says he didn't review underlying evidence of Mueller report before making obstruction call
They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence
Ok Moron did he pass on any charges against Trump to anyone? A simple yes or no will do. Further did he or did he NOT state for the record NO EVIDENCE of Collision by Trump and his campaign, again yes or no will do.Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......
Actually, that's not what they said.
They said they could not find definitive evidence to prove members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian GOVERNMENT. This is on top of the several cases that have been sent on by Mueller's team, but not made public.
They could not find definitive meaning there was not enough or not any evidence at all...
So in the end the Collusion argument is dead and should be dropped but alas the left need it Benghazi...
No, it means what it says, and in order to pursue charges it takes a mountain of evidence, which is hard to find when dealing with governments who can use people that is extremely hard to tie back to them.
For example, Erik Prince may not be considered part of Trump's campaign team, but he was busted for meeting with Russians... and is Trump's Sec. of Education Betsy Devos' brother.
So Mueller's team could not find enough definitive evidence to prove conspiracy, but also said they could not exonerate Trump's team either.
Too funny....tell me....is it a Prosecutors to "exonerate" ANYONE?
Mueller was doing an investigation, and is a special counsel, not a prosecutor. Any time Mueller felt he had enough to charge someone, he passed it off to someone else. Have you been in a cave the last 2 years?
True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.I don't have time to read all that shit.
the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.
there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.
We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?Barr didn't even read the report,
Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.
The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.
how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?
He admitted it to Congress. They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence given by Mueller's report before making his statement that there was no collusion or obstruction.
Barr says he didn't review underlying evidence of Mueller report before making obstruction callThey asked him if he had read the underlying evidence
and because he didn't read the 'underlying evidence', that means he didn't read the report?
It wasn't his job to read the 'underlying evidence'.
his job was to read the report, and submit a summary..
WHERE DO YOU PEOPLE COME UP WITH THIS CRAP?
IN FACT, WHAT MORON ASKED SUCH A STUPID QUESTION?
Ok Moron did he pass on any charges against Trump to anyone? A simple yes or no will do. Further did he or did he NOT state for the record NO EVIDENCE of Collision by Trump and his campaign, again yes or no will do.Actually, that's not what they said.
They said they could not find definitive evidence to prove members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian GOVERNMENT. This is on top of the several cases that have been sent on by Mueller's team, but not made public.
They could not find definitive meaning there was not enough or not any evidence at all...
So in the end the Collusion argument is dead and should be dropped but alas the left need it Benghazi...
No, it means what it says, and in order to pursue charges it takes a mountain of evidence, which is hard to find when dealing with governments who can use people that is extremely hard to tie back to them.
For example, Erik Prince may not be considered part of Trump's campaign team, but he was busted for meeting with Russians... and is Trump's Sec. of Education Betsy Devos' brother.
So Mueller's team could not find enough definitive evidence to prove conspiracy, but also said they could not exonerate Trump's team either.
Too funny....tell me....is it a Prosecutors to "exonerate" ANYONE?
Mueller was doing an investigation, and is a special counsel, not a prosecutor. Any time Mueller felt he had enough to charge someone, he passed it off to someone else. Have you been in a cave the last 2 years?
Why in HELL would he read evidence that the Democrats specifically told him to belive and accept as fact? Further why would he read the underlying evidence for a report that he had someone run for 2 years and come to conclusions on. And then as a point of fact he looked at the evidence for the conspiracy charge as he had to make a decision. You lying bastards just make shit up out of whole cloth when ever it suits you don't you?We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?
.
and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.
Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?Barr didn't even read the report,
Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.
The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.
how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?
He admitted it to Congress. They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence given by Mueller's report before making his statement that there was no collusion or obstruction.
Barr says he didn't review underlying evidence of Mueller report before making obstruction call
I only got past the lede before I had what I deemed a good response.In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900
Posted this:
For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.
The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.
But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.
The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.
Mueller should be asked:
1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?
2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?
3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?
4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?
5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?
6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?
7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?
With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.
And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....
Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!
It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....
THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....
People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....
Informing people, is arming people...
All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....
President Trump obstructing can follow....
Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...
He didn't say that.Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......
