Don't make a Mistake...

[RetiredGySgt]

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......

He didn't say that.

HE DID SAY THAT. NO COLLUSION. Good God you people are STUPID.

 

[Papageorgio]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

If the Democrats have no intention of impeaching Trump, like Pelosi has said, why are they wasting time on a hearing? Do you think the Democrats will change their minds? If they have no plans to do anything and continue to drag this out, it is another example of Democrats and Republicans putting party over country.

Both parties are jokes and disgusting. I won’t vote for either party again and anyone who does is either a moron or are putting party over country. I thought Benghazi was pure BS but this takes the cake.

 

[Lewdog]

With silly memes? Do you know how ridiculous and childish you guys sound on the left?


.

We only sound crazy to the people who have been too lazy or for the lack of time, to read the report...

and too trusting of their favorite news sources and talking hosts/heads, who have lead them astray.

Barr didn't even read the report, you think the Trump supporters here would?

Barr didn't even read the report,

Last time someone posted that, I a]sked fo7r a link.

The link he gave, stated that Barr QUOTED parts of the report.

how could he QUOTE it, if he didn't READ it?

He admitted it to Congress. They asked him if he had read the underlying evidence given by Mueller's report before making his statement that there was no collusion or obstruction.

Barr says he didn't review underlying evidence of Mueller report before making obstruction call

Why in HELL would he read evidence that the Democrats specifically told him to belive and accept as fact? Further why would he read the underlying evidence for a report that he had someone run for 2 years and come to conclusions on. And then as a point of fact he looked at the evidence for the conspiracy charge as he had to make a decision. You lying bastards just make shit up out of whole cloth when ever it suits you don't you?

Mueller didn't make conclusions on charges for Trump. How many times do you need to be told? Mueller said he would follow the DOJ policy that a sitting President can not be indicted.

How many times do you need to be told? Mueller said he would follow the DOJ policy that a sitting President can not be indicted.

How many times do you need to be told? Mueller said he would follow the DOJ policy that a sitting President can not be indicted.

How many times do you need to be told? Mueller said he would follow the DOJ policy that a sitting President can not be indicted.

I honestly can not believe you think it is responsible for the AG of the United States to NOT READ the entire report before going public with his conclusions of the report...

All Barr has really done now is, make it harder on himself and Trump. Barr got caught lying in congress, and you know it's bad when even Lindsey Graham says he is writing to Mueller to see what he talked to Barr about on their phone call.

Graham asks Mueller if he wants to testify on Barr phone call

 

[Crepitus]

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......

He didn't say that.

HE DID SAY THAT. NO COLLUSION. Good God you people are STUPID.

Quote away, I'm willing to learn.

 

[OKTexas]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

 

[Lewdog]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Obstruction has nothing to do with collusion. But to the POINT Mueller SPECIFICALLY SAID NO COLLUSION. God you morons are dumb as rocks. Now be specific and show us where Trump Obstructed Mueller in any way......

He didn't say that.

HE DID SAY THAT. NO COLLUSION. Good God you people are STUPID.

Quote away, I'm willing to learn.

Obviously you can not read it is in the report.

 

[OKTexas]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Well you might want to go back and watch Rosenstein's press announcements on the indictments. No Americans involved. End of story.

.

 

[Lewdog]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Well you might want to go back and watch Rosenstein's press announcements on the indictments. No Americans involved. End of story.

.

Wrong. No Americans "Knowingly."

""There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity," Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said at a press conference on Friday."

BOMBSHELL: Special Counsel Says No American Knowingly Involved In Russian Interference

 

[McRocket]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

If you don’t have the time to read it...then you cannot know if it is ‘shit’ or not.

Duh.

 

[OKTexas]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

 

[Lewdog]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

 

[OKTexas]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I don't have time to read all that shit.

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

NOT one of which was a member of the Trump Campaign as accused by the dems.

 

[Lewdog]

True, that's why it is important for congress to ask direct questions from Mueller about the Russian Interference etc, so he can explain things that happened that are in the report.

the Obstruction part is here nor there, when it is up to the Republican lead Senate to remove him from office... the only way that could happened is if the people in this Nation learn about the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed.

there are some obstruction questions asked of Mueller, but the whole darn hearing should not be about that... imho, that would be a mistake.

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

 

[OKTexas]

The AAG said time and again, no Americans were involved in the Russian activities. There was no Trump or any other American connection. Why do you chose to lie?

.

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

 

[Oddball]

In another thread that was closed, uncertain on why, Nat4900

Posted this:

For the many of us who want justice, accountability and transparency, from what the Mueller team investigated, reported on and concluded, the Mueller testimony is a MUST.

The stakes are high for both sides of the aisle.

But, in my opinion, Mueller is such a "straight shooter" that to presume that he will side with democrats.....even after the Trump WH and the leadership in the DOJ have derided him........may be wrong.

The efficacy of Mueller's testimony will depend on the simple and direct questions posed to him without necessarily asking him to arrive at any new decisions.

Mueller should be asked:

1. Given the findings listed in your report......and placing aside the current DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.........would a prosecutor like yourself indict ANYONE based on the reported obstruction findings?

2. Once AG Barr took charge of your investigation, was any pressure made upon your team to wrap up the inquiry? If such pressure was placed on you, is THAT the reason why you did not subpoena Me. Trump to openly testify before a grand jury?

3. Given the number of "I don't recall" responses to your written questions to the WH, why did you not further request follow-up questions?............What stopped you from making such requests?

4. In your through investigation, did you request and were given information from the Deutsche Bank regarding Trump's dealings with that Bank?

5. In your inquiry, did you request and were given copies of Trump's tax returns? If you were given such access, how many years were made available to your team?

6. Mr. Mueller, could you name any and ALL other witnesses who were requested but refused to appear before your team or grand juries?

7. Mr. MUeller, have you had any opposition placed upon your team in sharing your team's findings with other federal prosecutorial districts that are continuing their separate inquiries on topics beyond your scope of work as a special counsel?

With the exception of the first question, the rest should be direct to elicit clear-cut and not opinionated responses.

And I wanted to tell Nat4900 that it would be a great mistake to not cover part one of his investigation and not just part two....

Part two, the obstruction of an Official Investigation, means nothing to anyone that does not know the details of the Investigation that was obstructed!!!

It's important for uninformed people to be informed about the EXTENSIVE Russian Interference in our last election, the means they did it, and the Trump Campaign connection to it....

THIS CAN NOT AND SHOULD NOT be skipped, and if there is not enough time to do both, it is more important to go over Part one vs 2..... honest to goodness it is.....

People need to know what a great job the Mueller team did in tracing down what they could, people need to know the darn facts of the investigation, the obstruction of justice can then follow.... without knowing the facts of what was found in the investigation, how are people going to get upset or understand the urgency of protecting ourselves or even understand it... when the admin, is playing like the whole interference by Russians and his team's readiness to work with them, is some every day thing that anybody would do, or some made up hoax as our dearest president claims.... securing our elections from future attack is the most important thing to do....

Informing people, is arming people...

All those questions you have above, can wait.... people need to be informed, on the Trump side as well....

President Trump obstructing can follow....

Plus, informing people with the actual Mueller FACTS, will help combat all the FAKE stories the Republicans are trying to deflect with...

Nothing was obstructed....Under the legal system that has been in operation for the last several centuries, NOBODY is required to prove that they didn't do something....The onus is on the prosecutor to show evidence that the suspect did do something, which the Mule came nowhere near doing.

The last two years were a monumental waste of time and effort....Y'all lost...Grow the hell up and get over it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You can play all the word games you want, the FACT is NO CRIME was committed. No one colluded and no one obstructed. For one thing there has to be an underlying CRIME for obstruction to occur.

 

[Lewdog]

No, that isn't what was said. He said no Americans "knowingly" worked with the Russian Government.

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Yeah, one dude sold some identities and had no clue who he was selling to. LMAO

.

No, that wasn't all. There were people who sold server and ad space to people who said they lived in the U.S., but paid in rubles.

How many of those folks were indicted?

.

Did I say they were?

With currency conversion over payment platforms they my not have known what currency the bill was paid in. But that doesn't negate the FACT that no one in Trumps orbit was found to have conspired with the Russians. No matter how you commies try to spin it.

.

Let's do this one more time. Mueller could not find definitive evidence to show someone within Trump's campaign, conspired with the Russian government.

Erik Prince is a very good example of this, and it will be interesting to see if he is one of the redacted investigations still to drop.

Democrats ask Bill Barr for PERJURY probe into Erik Prince over meeting with Putin's banker | Daily Mail Online

Mueller had 2 YEARS and COMPLETE AUTHORITY to investigate, no one prevent him in any way from that, He found no evidence of collusion which means there was NONE you moron.