That would depend on whether you are willing to put your 'facts' into their full context with all the factors involved included.
.........
I've already posted plenty in their full context. Why the hell are you going to make me go back through the thread to post them again? It's not like you check my sources out.
I don't need to check your sources out. I am confident that they all support what you want to believe.
What I am talking about as full context are including all the credible sources that dispute your sources. I'm not talking at all about highly partisan or wingnut websites, but non partisan, and non political evaluations by credible architects, engineers, and scientists.
Anybody who knows how to minimally use a browser can come up with any number of sources who will agree with just about any thesis you want to put out there.
When the questions of 9/11 as an inside job first came up, I read ALL the sources, theories, propaganda, and other information that was being posted. I read your sources. And I read the other sources.
I think the sources who dispute that 9/11 was an inside job have far more credibility and make a far better case than those promoting the inside job theory.
I have come to my conclusions about illegal immigration, global warming, the healthcare bill, cap & trade etc. the very same way. Unless you read ALL sides with an open mind, there is no way to arrive at an informed opinion.
My informed opinion is that any theory that 9/11 was an inside job is ludicrous and is being promoted by people who like creating conspiracy theories for the benefit of those who want to believe them.
But that's just me.