Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
Because he literally can't be legally associated with one.Cancer charities?
why bring that up?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he literally can't be legally associated with one.Cancer charities?
why bring that up?
Wrong...what the laws do is allow us to lock up the criminals.....we state the law, they break it, we can isolate them from society. The problem is the democrat party judges, prosecutors and politicians releasing the most violent, dangerous criminals over and over again.
They are equal, but my Right to own and carry a gun which I do not use in an illegal manner cannot be taken because a tiny number of people break the law.......you Right to speech is not taken from you because some people use computers for child porn......you doofus.
They are equal, but my Right to own and carry a gun which I do not use in an illegal manner cannot be taken because a tiny number of people break the law.......you Right to speech is not taken from you because some people use computers for child porn......you doofus.
Never been, information given was hearsay,
So it's safe to say you don't know what you are talking about.
Sorry about the typo felons
I judge a judge on their actions
Not really.These four words, "shall not be infringed" is an absurdity.
Keep in mind that the Constitution specifies the federal role of the militia as: enforcing the law, suppressing insurrection, and repelling invasion. Weapons that are too destructive for such duties can be excluded from the Second Amendment. So there is no need to worry about nuclear-tipped ICBMs.Arms are nunchucks, gravity knives, fragmentation grenades, anti tank bazookas, claymore mines, fully automatic long guns, surface to air missiles, etc. etc.
The Heller ruling protects our right to have weapons that are suitable for self defense, as well as weapons that there is no justification for restricting.Thus the logic is clear, "shall not be infringed" is negotiable on all lethal weapons. That includes small arms too!
Every time I hear some variation of the term "common sense", whatever is being proposed is invariably a violation of our civil liberties.Now, control does not take away all firearms in the control of millions of us. Gun Control is common sense:
No such cost exists. Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.Due to the number of murders; The number of mass killings of innocents people going on way on days when they are in the wrong place at the wrong time, such as schools, movie theaters, concerts, parks, restaurants, and driving home on highways; Suicides and Accidents.
The costs of these four words, "shall not be infringed" is not only an absurdity, it costs the nation an enormous amount of treasure and blood.
The Ministry of Truth has classified your post as disinformation.It's people like you who are allowing criminals who have yet to have been arrested, and those who are protected by HIPAA rules who don't and can't disclose if their patient is a danger to themselves and others, unless the other person is a named person.
It can be but generally not allowedAs a mater of fact hearsay can be probative evidence.
![]()
Gun show loophole - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Not really.
Keep in mind that the Constitution specifies the federal role of the militia as: enforcing the law, suppressing insurrection, and repelling invasion. Weapons that are too destructive for such duties can be excluded from the Second Amendment. So there is no need to worry about nuclear-tipped ICBMs.
It is also possible to regard the right to keep and bear arms as referring only to the sorts of weapons that are carried and operated by individual soldiers.
This still leaves us with the right to have fragmentation grenades, unguided anti tank bazookas, claymore mines, and fully automatic long guns, but not heavier military weapons.
Shoulder-fired missiles that are guided are actually crew served weapons, so only unguided bazookas would fall under the Second Amendment if is limited to individually-operated weapons.
The Heller ruling protects our right to have weapons that are suitable for self defense, as well as weapons that there is no justification for restricting.
Every time I hear some variation of the term "common sense", whatever is being proposed is invariably a violation of our civil liberties.
No such cost exists. Gun availability has little impact on homicide rates.
![]()
Everybody's Lying About the Link Between Gun Ownership and Homicide
Revealing how the media lies with graphs to further an anti-gun agenda.hwfo.substack.com
![]()
What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
While the number of gun deaths in the U.S. fell for the second consecutive year in 2023, it remained among the highest annual totals on record.www.pewresearch.org
![]()
What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
While the number of gun deaths in the U.S. fell for the second consecutive year in 2023, it remained among the highest annual totals on record.www.pewresearch.org
People who are murdered with guns would be just as dead if they were murdered with a different kind of weapon.![]()
What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S.
While the number of gun deaths in the U.S. fell for the second consecutive year in 2023, it remained among the highest annual totals on record.www.pewresearch.org
Ornamentals are well, Crazy AsiansSuicides are not a gun issue...just ask the South Koreans and Japanese, and the Chinese......
Suicide & Accidental Discharge should not be factored into all of this
Uh no , 2A Purists say Shall not be infringed , Moderates like me think there are rare cases where there should be Prohibited Persons ( Illegals ) (Escaped Prisoners) ( Foreign Terrorists in the Country Illegally ) ( Mental Patients ) ...Guns actually make a suicide attempt more likely a successful suicide. They are also an easily-obtained piece of equipment that turns a moment of desperation into an action that cannot be undone.
The ONLY reason to not factor in suicide in all this is because even gun advocates know that these things are serious pieces of equipment that should be more highly controlled.
Guns actually make a suicide attempt more likely a successful suicide. They are also an easily-obtained piece of equipment that turns a moment of desperation into an action that cannot be undone.
The ONLY reason to not factor in suicide in all this is because even gun advocates know that these things are serious pieces of equipment that should be more highly controlled.
Guns actually make a suicide attempt more likely a successful suicide. They are also an easily-obtained piece of equipment that turns a moment of desperation into an action that cannot be undone.
The ONLY reason to not factor in suicide in all this is because even gun advocates know that these things are serious pieces of equipment that should be more highly controlled.
They are highly controlled...our problem is the democrat party releasing the most violent, most dangerous criminals over and over again.....they are the ones committing the most shootings in the tiny areas of democrat party controlled cities....and you morons never want to address that fact.
![]()
Fact check: Big cities have crime and more Democrats, but it's a stretch to link them
A viral Facebook post links “America’s deadliest cities” with having a “Democrat majority,” implying a causal connection. But that's a stretch at best.www.usatoday.com