Does Anyone Actually Think Muslims Did 9/11?

Did Crazy Muslims Do 9/11?

  • Yes, Muslims hate freedom!

    Votes: 9 81.8%
  • No, Zionist Jews hate freedom!

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Total voters
    11
Fanciful stories that go against thousands of witnesses testimonies. Usually anti-semetic in nature, or blaming the Government. Each "truth" has it's own evidence that contradicts other "truths".


Noticing that 600F burning jet fuel did not cause 2200Fmolten steel to pour out of the south tower
Noticing the 767 that hit the south tower had no markings on it and a cargo hatch at the center bottom of the fuselage, indicating it was a CARGO not passenger version
Noticing that if the nose of a 757 was 8 feet off the ground, that the engines would be IN THE GROUND


Again, every honest patriotic American with an IQ over 5 looks at the evidence and notices all the lies.

Then there are the subs and their Zionist masters....
 
Something which requires an IQ over 5 to obtain in America today....
So you're unable to give is your version of "9/11 "truth" and have to resort to childish insults. Are you afraid to tell us your wacky theory

Knowing your posts I know it's a "Jewish conspiracy "
 
Noticing that 600F burning jet fuel did not cause 2200Fmolten steel to pour out of the south tower
Noticing the 767 that hit the south tower had no markings on it and a cargo hatch at the center bottom of the fuselage, indicating it was a CARGO not passenger version
Noticing that if the nose of a 757 was 8 feet off the ground, that the engines would be IN THE GROUND


Again, every honest patriotic American with an IQ over 5 looks at the evidence and notices all the lies.

Then there are the subs and their Zionist masters....



Maybe you have poor eyesight.

What part of at 600 Celsius steel loses 50% of its structural integrity do you not get? it was burning at 1000 degrees in some pockets!

Flight 175 was indeed marked, here is the plane right here.

Boeing_767-222,_United_Airlines_AN0188143.jpg


As for the engines, the plane is made out of aluminum, not solid titanium. Aluminum bends, Dumb ass, yes, even at 8 feet the plane could bend its wings that far.
 
So you're unable to give is your version of "9/11 "truth" and have to resort to childish insults. Are you afraid to tell us your wacky theory

Knowing your posts I know it's a "Jewish conspiracy "


Continued....

There are two versions of who "Osama" is/was, the official version, radical Saudi cleric who moved to afghan, and col Tim osman, CIA "asset" involved with mission to destabilize soviet occupation of Afghanistan. There are no photos of "Osama" in Saudi. The KGB put out three of col osman talking to Carter NSA zbigniew circa 1980. Busted....

After 911, "Osama" initially denied doing it

Then days later took credit, but mused that the "planes" would not have brought the towers down (remarkable scientific expertise for a religious cleric)

The W made "Osama" "not a priority..."
 
Maybe you have poor eyesight.

What part of at 600 Celsius steel loses 50% of its structural integrity do you not get? it was burning at 1000 degrees in some pockets!

Flight 175 was indeed marked, here is the plane right here.

View attachment 539772


As for the engines, the plane is made out of aluminum, not solid titanium. Aluminum bends, Dumb ass, yes, even at 8 feet the plane could bend its wings that far.


Laughable. It is doubtful any WTC steel got to 600F from the jet fuel. The plane (bomb in north tower) opened up air flow through, and most jet fuel burned in the fireball that came out the other side of the south tower (the north tower explosion came out all four sides equally). There was no long concentrated jet fuel fire.

None of the steel below got hot from the plane.

Click click click went each floor.... Controlled demolition.
 
Laughable. It is doubtful any WTC steel got to 600F from the jet fuel. The plane (bomb in north tower) opened up air flow through, and most jet fuel burned in the fireball that came out the other side of the south tower (the north tower explosion came out all four sides equally). There was no long concentrated jet fuel fire.

None of the steel below got hot from the plane.

Click click click went each floor.... Controlled demolition.
dude WHY do you feed the troll?

i guarantee langley shills soupnazi,surada and confederate soldier and the other paid shills that have penetrated this forum are on the suicide hotline after learning that an entire football stadium was chanting FUCK JOE BIDEN.:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
Laughable. It is doubtful any WTC steel got to 600F from the jet fuel. The plane (bomb in north tower) opened up air flow through, and most jet fuel burned in the fireball that came out the other side of the south tower (the north tower explosion came out all four sides equally). There was no long concentrated jet fuel fire.

None of the steel below got hot from the plane.

Click click click went each floor.... Controlled demolition.



Which 9/11 did you watch?

The 9/11 I saw had a two massive airliners crash into very tall towers. The crash opened up large holes in the towers, not bombs. The wind blew through these holes, and heated everything that was burning... fuel, chairs, desks, flooring, computers, plastics, papers, etc.

The steel below didn't have to get hot. When you have thousands of tons of floor collapsing onto the floors below, one ceiling isn't going to stop that.


That's it. We must be watching different 9/11s. Glad we cleared that up.
 
You saw one plane, a 767 cargo version, collide with the south tower.

The "naudet video" of the north tower is a photo shop fraud, and the proof is the explosion.

When the plane hits the south tower, it has momentum and direction, and produces a giant debris filled orange fireball out the other side.

The naudet video shows a massive explosion of stuff coming out where the "plane came in," very different than south tower.

Close up photos of the north tower show metal bending out where "the plane came in,"


As with the titanic

THE STEEL DOES NOT LIE

Nothing came in the north tower. Watch the naudet video, notice "the plane" is also TOO SLOW....
 
You saw one plane, a 767 cargo version, collide with the south tower.

The "naudet video" of the north tower is a photo shop fraud, and the proof is the explosion.

When the plane hits the south tower, it has momentum and direction, and produces a giant debris filled orange fireball out the other side.

The naudet video shows a massive explosion of stuff coming out where the "plane came in," very different than south tower.

Close up photos of the north tower show metal bending out where "the plane came in,"


As with the titanic

THE STEEL DOES NOT LIE

Nothing came in the north tower. Watch the naudet video, notice "the plane" is also TOO SLOW....


Wrong again.

Below, is a photo of the South Tower on impact.


PRI_78252725.jpg



As you can see, there is a massive fireball on the right hand side of the building. That's the exit hole explosion. On the left hand side, there is a separate, smaller explosion from when the plane went in. The Naudet Video didn't lie, it sure enough captured the smaller explosion on the impact side of the North tower.


As for the steel bending outwards on the WTC, clean your glasses bud. Steel is going into the building, not out.


woman_wtc.jpg
 
Laughable. It is doubtful any WTC steel got to 600F from the jet fuel. The plane (bomb in north tower) opened up air flow through, and most jet fuel burned in the fireball that came out the other side of the south tower (the north tower explosion came out all four sides equally). There was no long concentrated jet fuel fire.

None of the steel below got hot from the plane.

Click click click went each floor.... Controlled demolition.

Didn't you just say it was thermite? Thermite doesn't explode. Now you're saying it was explosive bombs and controlled demolition?

Your theories are mutually exclusive....and you run from one to the other when the theory killing holes are punched in it. Then back to the first when it doesn't work either.

If your claims had merit, you wouldn't have to run
 
You saw one plane, a 767 cargo version, collide with the south tower.

The "naudet video" of the north tower is a photo shop fraud, and the proof is the explosion.

When the plane hits the south tower, it has momentum and direction, and produces a giant debris filled orange fireball out the other side.

The naudet video shows a massive explosion of stuff coming out where the "plane came in," very different than south tower.

Close up photos of the north tower show metal bending out where "the plane came in,"


As with the titanic

THE STEEL DOES NOT LIE

Nothing came in the north tower. Watch the naudet video, notice "the plane" is also TOO SLOW....

The 'steel does not lie'? Not a single girder was cut in a manner consistent with explosive demolition. Not a single bomb was ever observed, not a single inch of blasting wire, not a single detonator, despite your silly conspiracy requiring tens of thousands.

You have no idea what you're talking about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top