Curious, that a supporter of the "confederacy" is 100% about shouting down 911 truth. One might think you oppose affirmative action, but you never post in topics on the subject.
You are a fraud.
You have two goals here.
One is getting morons to equate
Supporting trump
With
Supporting the Confederacy
And the real purpose - shouting down truth
Your main purpose here is to argue
Building 7 was not controlled demo
600F burning jet fuel caused 2200F molten steel
A 757 can fly with its nose 8 feet off the ground (engines extend 15 feet lower)
That flight 93 either disintegrated on impact or self buried like Scooby Doo in a plant pot.
That no photos of "Osama" in Saudi does not matter
That 3 photos of osman and zbigniew do not matter
That making "Osama" "not a priority" was really cool
AQ offed pat Tillman
You are a Zionist democrat party activist and you were one of the homos in MAGAdrag 1/6.....
It's odd that you don't look deeper into my name and see what I really mean by it. In general, I support a smaller federal government, subservient to the states, thereby enhancing states rights and granting more freedoms to smaller governing bodies therefore giving more freedom to the average citizen. There is no racial connotations behind it, no stupidity involved. Quite the opposite. I think you and I can agree that the federal government should be drastically reduced, right?
Anyway...
1. Building 7 was not a controlled demo, as too much damage by falling debris and fire caused it to collapse. Remember, hundreds of firefighters were lost when the Twin Towers collapsed. They weren't exactly eager to rush into WTC 7 to put out the fire when it could collapse too.
2. No molten steel was at the Twin Towers, so no, 600f. Jet fuel cannot melt steel. It didn't happen. What did happen was the heat softened the steel, causing it to fail. Failing and melting are not the same thing.
3. Aircraft are made of aluminum, which in case you haven't learned this yet, is much more giving and "bendy" than steel. It is no stretch to imagine that the engines located on the wings, bent up higher than usual, way higher. I mean it was crashing for petes sake. It isn't going to be rigid. There is a lot of bend and give to airplane aluminum, strong enough so it can fly, but weak enough that if it hits any resistance... like the ground... that it can bend.
4. Flight 93 did disintegrate on impact, why wouldn't it? I have my own theory however that if the plane was nosed down into the ground like it did, parts began flying off and breaking off of the plane due to its excessive speed. (when a plane goes faster than its limit, it breaks apart in the air, it might have done this in the air because it was going so fast towards the ground).
As for the rest of it, I do not follow the "whodunnit" aspect of it. I don't know who Tim Osman is, and I don't care about the rest of them. Osama Bin Laden was an evil dude, there is no denying that. I don't need to look at these other people because I know Osama admitted to it, bragged about it and was put high up on our hit list because he did it. You can debate me all you want here, I just don't have time to look into all the lore that you theorists put up. Each of you has "evidence" that the zionists did it, the government did it, the Saudis did it, etc. I am a simple guy. Terrorists did it, and that's good enough for me.
How old are ya man? Above 45? I'm 19. My youth makes me too dumb to quit. If you wish to insult my intelligence, just tell me I'm stupid for arguing with you. You may be right, but you are fun to argue with because you never back down. I like that. It gives me something to do in between work.
