- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,071
- 28,155
- 2,180
We will see no?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Doctors are coming out in droves saying hydroxychloroquine works
- Thread starter Jitss617
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answers
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,071
- 28,155
- 2,180
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
CarlinAnnArbor
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 56,099
- 40,981
- 3,615
Unless you're a bakeryNope. The courts are clear on what the law says.
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,427
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,429
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,431
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,433
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,302
- 70,043
- 2,635
LOLmy god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
Oh, the irony.
Moron, if you're going to call someone a motherfucker, at least possess enough brain cells to spell a simple, 5-letter word correctly. Otherwise, you look even dumber than the person you're trying to insult.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,436
obviously I know more than you,,,,You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.obviously I know more than you,,,,You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,438
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.obviously I know more than you,,,,You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
Yes, they’re extremely vague.they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.obviously I know more than you,,,,You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,096
- 37,150
- 2,615
- Banned
- #1,440
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???Yes, they’re extremely vague.they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.obviously I know more than you,,,,You don't know what you're talking about.my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,What legal aspect?thats why I said "in the legal aspect"Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.no they arent in the legal aspect,,,They're a private company, comrade.they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitutionFunny, I was thinking the same thing about youYou’re clueless.So many questions no answersDepends on how authoritarian you are feeling.We will see no?Yes they can.They can’t censor over public networksOkay. And?That interact with people who pay for the same servicesThey’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 227
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 152
- Locked
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 123
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 49
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 67
- Replies
- 76
- Views
- 443
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8139
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-