Doctors are coming out in droves saying hydroxychloroquine works

Status
Not open for further replies.
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
not according to the law,,,
Which law?

<here comes the vague answer because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about>
the same law that says you cant ban black people for being black,,,
Ha! Okay. You think that law applies to Facebook?
it applies to everyone,,,
You sure?
are you sure its not???
Yes. The law (which you haven’t even actually named) describes who it applies to.
which law is that??
You don’t know? You’re referring to it.
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
no it doesnt,,,
Everyone I’ve seen does. Pick a social media website at random and we will take a look at their terms.
show me one that says that without other specifics,,,
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
no it doesnt,,,
Everyone I’ve seen does. Pick a social media website at random and we will take a look at their terms.
show me one that says that without other specifics,,,
This website:

We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice.

 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
no it doesnt,,,
Everyone I’ve seen does. Pick a social media website at random and we will take a look at their terms.
show me one that says that without other specifics,,,
This website:

We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice.

what does it say before and after that???
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
No it doesn’t
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
no it doesnt,,,
Everyone I’ve seen does. Pick a social media website at random and we will take a look at their terms.
show me one that says that without other specifics,,,
This website:

We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice.

what does it say before and after that???
You know you can read it yourself
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
not according to the law,,,
Which law?

<here comes the vague answer because you don’t actually know what you’re talking about>
the same law that says you cant ban black people for being black,,,
Ha! Okay. You think that law applies to Facebook?
it applies to everyone,,,
You sure?
are you sure its not???
Yes. The law (which you haven’t even actually named) describes who it applies to.
which law is that??
You don’t know? You’re referring to it.
What are you doing to that poor guy?? :ack-1:
 
All we have is her word since doctors have suggested that 40-90 people were in that sample and asked why the whole testing was not presented to the medical community for evaluation. She is full of shit. Gynecological problems
are caused by having sex with demons and witches, and a retail business selling potions? Get real
well there were other doctors if you read the OP. so that's incorrect.
Yes, there are some others. There always are.
 
The double-blind trial recruited more than 800 volunteers who received either hydroxychloroquine or a placebo within four days of exposure to someone with confirmed COVID-19. Nearly 12% of hydroxychloroquine participants developed a COVID-19-like illness compared with 14.3% of those getting the placebo — a difference that was not significant.
2% not significant? 2% of 350 million is 7 million people. how is that not significant. the stuff you all post cracks me up. You made my case. didn't refute it. You still didn't explain why 100% of her patients recovered. seems to suggest differences in the studies.
Horseshit. You are siding with a charlatan who talks about having sex with demons and witches and has a retail business selling potions. You mean they gave the drug to 350 million people? You go with Trump, son.
I am certain that he has made sure that there is plenty of this drug available for your dining pleasure and If you contract the virus, take the drug since you are convinced. You will help Trump's bottom line since he had invested in the drug.

Most all of those words are incorrect
Some to the level of sheer lunacy.
As crazy as saying the government is run by half man, half lizards?

Did it include the years 2009 thru 2016?
Only your gynecologist knows for sure.
 
The double-blind trial recruited more than 800 volunteers who received either hydroxychloroquine or a placebo within four days of exposure to someone with confirmed COVID-19. Nearly 12% of hydroxychloroquine participants developed a COVID-19-like illness compared with 14.3% of those getting the placebo — a difference that was not significant.
2% not significant? 2% of 350 million is 7 million people. how is that not significant. the stuff you all post cracks me up. You made my case. didn't refute it. You still didn't explain why 100% of her patients recovered. seems to suggest differences in the studies.
Horseshit. You are siding with a charlatan who talks about having sex with demons and witches and has a retail business selling potions. You mean they gave the drug to 350 million people? You go with Trump, son.
I am certain that he has made sure that there is plenty of this drug available for your dining pleasure and If you contract the virus, take the drug since you are convinced. You will help Trump's bottom line since he had invested in the drug.

Most all of those words are incorrect
Some to the level of sheer lunacy.
As crazy as saying the government is run by half man, half lizards?

Did it include the years 2009 thru 2016?
Only your gynecologist knows for sure.
so me too
 
They are banning this black woman's voice on Twitter ,,

next time you call republicans racist.
View attachment 368236


Twitter's Jack Dorsey is a piece of shit!....they are banning everything and anything Conservative in Twitter!

Dr. Stella Immanuel knows exactly what she and the Doctors are talking about! she is also asking people who have been cured by Hydroxychloroquine to come forward and tell the rest of the world the truth!

What an amazing woman!:up:




So? Go post on Parler then. You idiots do have choices.



Are you saying Twitter's Jack Dorsey doesn't like the truth?

That Twitter has a problem with a doctor speaking the truth about Hydroxychloroquine?

That Twitter doesn't care about saving lives?

No, I'm saying Twitter is done with folks posting bullshit, especially when such bullshit can be harmful to their members. Rightards can't stand reality so they need to create their own, complete with alternative facts. So now they live in a bubble of their own creation with conservapedia because wikipedia doesn't spread their delusions. Now we have Parler because Twitter doesn't spread their delusions. What's next? Your own NFL?

So like I said, you idiots have choices. So why are you still bitching and moaning about Twitter?



Look at you! Posting links to research like a big boy!

Now this, for future reference, is an actual argument. Much more effective than the "you are attacking her because she is black" nonsense you were apparently copying from the leftists.

You’re the one attacking what she said you’re attacking a board-certified African-American doctor


Yes, I am. Any medical doctor who believes that demons cause illness deserves to be mocked and ridiculed. I stand by that.

But I absolutely reject your claim that I am attacking her because of her race.

So you can’t argue about her findings of the life-saving drug Trump discovered? You’re just attacking her personal views , of the voodoo that she practices in her culture.. Interesting


The link you posted suggests more studies on the effectiveness of the drug. I never said the drug didn't work. I questioned using her as anything more than a laughable example of rushing to put people in front of a camera.

As for cultural practices, does that include her claims that alien dna is being used in medical research? Or her claim that governments have been infiltrated by reptilians who disguise themselves as humans?

If her cultural practices include preaching that dream sex with demons causes gynecological illnesses, it shows her medical knowledge to be tainted. It is that simple. Ovarian cysts, endometriosis and other problems women have can be serious.

OK you’re just gonna continue to troll the black women.. troll somewhere else racist


Trolling means posting just for the reaction. I am ridiculing her for ignoring her medical training in favor of crackpot beliefs.

I think I'll stick around here. You using the democrat's "you're a racist" nonsense is hilarious.

She ignored medical training treating Covid ? Link?


She ignored her medical training. You added the "covid". To my knowledge, she hasn't had any training concerning Covid-19. She is an ER doctor.

Lol she has no Covid training!? Haha A ER DOCTOR HAS NO COVID TRAINING!? Hahaha I’m just going to leave this right here hahaha Hahahahah hahahhha


Do you think they treat Covid-19 in the ER? They diagnose it, and then move them for treatment. Dr. Emmanuel specifically talks wbout how many days they take the drug. Do you think the patient stays in the ER that whole time?

Yea they move them right to elderly facilities. Lol God you might be the stupidest motherfu on here


Do you think they give multi-day treatments in the ER? Do you think they do anything but stabilize and move to another department?

If so, you just took the prize as Dumbass of the Board.

"just??"


Good point. It would be hard to beat the depth of dumbassery he achieved when he claim Dwight Eisenhower's daughter (or granddaughter) emailed him confirming that 34th president was, in fact, Jewish. "She said" they kept it hidden, but Ike was a Jew.

It’s what I was told by Sarah
 
So many questions no answers
You’re clueless.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you
Here I thought people have a right to their property and how it’s used. You want to take away people’s property rights?
not when they're on a thing called the internet, they don't own that.
They’re on the internet because they’re stored on servers that the company owns, hooked up to electricity the company pays for, connected to the network on lines they pay for.
That interact with people who pay for the same services
Okay. And?
They can’t censor over public networks
Yes they can.
We will see no?
Depends on how authoritarian you are feeling.
The courts you mean. I know the law on censorship it’s written in the constitution
Nope. The courts are clear on what the law says.

The constitution doesn't prevent "censorship" by private companies.
they area public platform not a private company,,,if what you say is true then the phone company could cut your service for what you said,,,

havent you been watching the news about the details of whats going on??
They're a private company, comrade.

My phone conversations aren't broadcast to the world.
no they arent in the legal aspect,,,
Yes they are. Owned and operated by private individuals, not government.

Go ahead and nationalize Facebook if you want to change that, comrade.
thats why I said "in the legal aspect"
What legal aspect?
my god your a dumb mother fucker,,,,
You don't know what you're talking about.
obviously I know more than you,,,,
No, you really don't. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking in such vague terms.
they wouldnt be vague if you were educated on the subject,,,
Yes, they’re extremely vague.
vague like you comparing facebook to the everyday run of the mill private business on the street corner???

when in fact they have a whole different rule book that goes far beyond that average business,,,
All businesses have rule books.
DUH!!!!

you just implied there is only one,,,
No, I didn’t. You’re making up rules that are probably unconstitutional.
I didnt make up any rules,,,
So you must agree that Facebook or any internet platform is within their rights to remove content at their discretion.
Only if one violates the rules set up. Opposition speech isn’t a rule on their site. Hence they violated their contract with the user
The “contract” says they can remove anything they want for any reason they want.

Read the TOS
no it doesnt,,,
Everyone I’ve seen does. Pick a social media website at random and we will take a look at their terms.
show me one that says that without other specifics,,,
This website:

We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice.

what does it say before and after that???
You know you can read it yourself
I find it interesting you didnt use the terms of service from facebook,,,

its almost like you lied by omission,,
 
All we have is her word since doctors have suggested that 40-90 people were in that sample and asked why the whole testing was not presented to the medical community for evaluation. She is full of shit. Gynecological problems
are caused by having sex with demons and witches, and a retail business selling potions? Get real
well there were other doctors if you read the OP. so that's incorrect.
Yes, there are some others. There always are.
then it isn't limited to just the lady doc. hmmmmmmmm all the anxiety from the demofks. she must have really scared the snot out of you demos.
 
They are banning this black woman's voice on Twitter ,,

next time you call republicans racist.
View attachment 368236


Twitter's Jack Dorsey is a piece of shit!....they are banning everything and anything Conservative in Twitter!

Dr. Stella Immanuel knows exactly what she and the Doctors are talking about! she is also asking people who have been cured by Hydroxychloroquine to come forward and tell the rest of the world the truth!

What an amazing woman!:up:




So? Go post on Parler then. You idiots do have choices.



Are you saying Twitter's Jack Dorsey doesn't like the truth?

That Twitter has a problem with a doctor speaking the truth about Hydroxychloroquine?

That Twitter doesn't care about saving lives?

No, I'm saying Twitter is done with folks posting bullshit, especially when such bullshit can be harmful to their members. Rightards can't stand reality so they need to create their own, complete with alternative facts. So now they live in a bubble of their own creation with conservapedia because wikipedia doesn't spread their delusions. Now we have Parler because Twitter doesn't spread their delusions. What's next? Your own NFL?

So like I said, you idiots have choices. So why are you still bitching and moaning about Twitter?



Look at you! Posting links to research like a big boy!

Now this, for future reference, is an actual argument. Much more effective than the "you are attacking her because she is black" nonsense you were apparently copying from the leftists.

You’re the one attacking what she said you’re attacking a board-certified African-American doctor


Yes, I am. Any medical doctor who believes that demons cause illness deserves to be mocked and ridiculed. I stand by that.

But I absolutely reject your claim that I am attacking her because of her race.

So you can’t argue about her findings of the life-saving drug Trump discovered? You’re just attacking her personal views , of the voodoo that she practices in her culture.. Interesting


The link you posted suggests more studies on the effectiveness of the drug. I never said the drug didn't work. I questioned using her as anything more than a laughable example of rushing to put people in front of a camera.

As for cultural practices, does that include her claims that alien dna is being used in medical research? Or her claim that governments have been infiltrated by reptilians who disguise themselves as humans?

If her cultural practices include preaching that dream sex with demons causes gynecological illnesses, it shows her medical knowledge to be tainted. It is that simple. Ovarian cysts, endometriosis and other problems women have can be serious.

OK you’re just gonna continue to troll the black women.. troll somewhere else racist


Trolling means posting just for the reaction. I am ridiculing her for ignoring her medical training in favor of crackpot beliefs.

I think I'll stick around here. You using the democrat's "you're a racist" nonsense is hilarious.

She ignored medical training treating Covid ? Link?


She ignored her medical training. You added the "covid". To my knowledge, she hasn't had any training concerning Covid-19. She is an ER doctor.

Lol she has no Covid training!? Haha A ER DOCTOR HAS NO COVID TRAINING!? Hahaha I’m just going to leave this right here hahaha Hahahahah hahahhha


Do you think they treat Covid-19 in the ER? They diagnose it, and then move them for treatment. Dr. Emmanuel specifically talks wbout how many days they take the drug. Do you think the patient stays in the ER that whole time?

Yea they move them right to elderly facilities. Lol God you might be the stupidest motherfu on here


Do you think they give multi-day treatments in the ER? Do you think they do anything but stabilize and move to another department?

If so, you just took the prize as Dumbass of the Board.

"just??"


Good point. It would be hard to beat the depth of dumbassery he achieved when he claim Dwight Eisenhower's daughter (or granddaughter) emailed him confirming that 34th president was, in fact, Jewish. "She said" they kept it hidden, but Ike was a Jew.

It’s what I was told by Sarah


LMAO!!! Sarah? When you posted it back in April her name was Karen.

If you are going to tell so many lies, you should at least keep track of what you say.
 
They are banning this black woman's voice on Twitter ,,

next time you call republicans racist.
View attachment 368236


Twitter's Jack Dorsey is a piece of shit!....they are banning everything and anything Conservative in Twitter!

Dr. Stella Immanuel knows exactly what she and the Doctors are talking about! she is also asking people who have been cured by Hydroxychloroquine to come forward and tell the rest of the world the truth!

What an amazing woman!:up:




So? Go post on Parler then. You idiots do have choices.



Are you saying Twitter's Jack Dorsey doesn't like the truth?

That Twitter has a problem with a doctor speaking the truth about Hydroxychloroquine?

That Twitter doesn't care about saving lives?

No, I'm saying Twitter is done with folks posting bullshit, especially when such bullshit can be harmful to their members. Rightards can't stand reality so they need to create their own, complete with alternative facts. So now they live in a bubble of their own creation with conservapedia because wikipedia doesn't spread their delusions. Now we have Parler because Twitter doesn't spread their delusions. What's next? Your own NFL?

So like I said, you idiots have choices. So why are you still bitching and moaning about Twitter?



Look at you! Posting links to research like a big boy!

Now this, for future reference, is an actual argument. Much more effective than the "you are attacking her because she is black" nonsense you were apparently copying from the leftists.

You’re the one attacking what she said you’re attacking a board-certified African-American doctor


Yes, I am. Any medical doctor who believes that demons cause illness deserves to be mocked and ridiculed. I stand by that.

But I absolutely reject your claim that I am attacking her because of her race.

So you can’t argue about her findings of the life-saving drug Trump discovered? You’re just attacking her personal views , of the voodoo that she practices in her culture.. Interesting


The link you posted suggests more studies on the effectiveness of the drug. I never said the drug didn't work. I questioned using her as anything more than a laughable example of rushing to put people in front of a camera.

As for cultural practices, does that include her claims that alien dna is being used in medical research? Or her claim that governments have been infiltrated by reptilians who disguise themselves as humans?

If her cultural practices include preaching that dream sex with demons causes gynecological illnesses, it shows her medical knowledge to be tainted. It is that simple. Ovarian cysts, endometriosis and other problems women have can be serious.

OK you’re just gonna continue to troll the black women.. troll somewhere else racist


Trolling means posting just for the reaction. I am ridiculing her for ignoring her medical training in favor of crackpot beliefs.

I think I'll stick around here. You using the democrat's "you're a racist" nonsense is hilarious.

She ignored medical training treating Covid ? Link?


She ignored her medical training. You added the "covid". To my knowledge, she hasn't had any training concerning Covid-19. She is an ER doctor.

Lol she has no Covid training!? Haha A ER DOCTOR HAS NO COVID TRAINING!? Hahaha I’m just going to leave this right here hahaha Hahahahah hahahhha


Do you think they treat Covid-19 in the ER? They diagnose it, and then move them for treatment. Dr. Emmanuel specifically talks wbout how many days they take the drug. Do you think the patient stays in the ER that whole time?

Yea they move them right to elderly facilities. Lol God you might be the stupidest motherfu on here


Do you think they give multi-day treatments in the ER? Do you think they do anything but stabilize and move to another department?

If so, you just took the prize as Dumbass of the Board.

"just??"


Good point. It would be hard to beat the depth of dumbassery he achieved when he claim Dwight Eisenhower's daughter (or granddaughter) emailed him confirming that 34th president was, in fact, Jewish. "She said" they kept it hidden, but Ike was a Jew.

It’s what I was told by Sarah


LMAO!!! Sarah? When you posted it back in April her name was Karen.

If you are going to tell so many lies, you should at least keep track of what you say.

It’s the relationship that we have a nickname that me and the family call her
 
They are banning this black woman's voice on Twitter ,,

next time you call republicans racist.
View attachment 368236


Twitter's Jack Dorsey is a piece of shit!....they are banning everything and anything Conservative in Twitter!

Dr. Stella Immanuel knows exactly what she and the Doctors are talking about! she is also asking people who have been cured by Hydroxychloroquine to come forward and tell the rest of the world the truth!

What an amazing woman!:up:




So? Go post on Parler then. You idiots do have choices.



Are you saying Twitter's Jack Dorsey doesn't like the truth?

That Twitter has a problem with a doctor speaking the truth about Hydroxychloroquine?

That Twitter doesn't care about saving lives?

No, I'm saying Twitter is done with folks posting bullshit, especially when such bullshit can be harmful to their members. Rightards can't stand reality so they need to create their own, complete with alternative facts. So now they live in a bubble of their own creation with conservapedia because wikipedia doesn't spread their delusions. Now we have Parler because Twitter doesn't spread their delusions. What's next? Your own NFL?

So like I said, you idiots have choices. So why are you still bitching and moaning about Twitter?



Look at you! Posting links to research like a big boy!

Now this, for future reference, is an actual argument. Much more effective than the "you are attacking her because she is black" nonsense you were apparently copying from the leftists.

You’re the one attacking what she said you’re attacking a board-certified African-American doctor


Yes, I am. Any medical doctor who believes that demons cause illness deserves to be mocked and ridiculed. I stand by that.

But I absolutely reject your claim that I am attacking her because of her race.

So you can’t argue about her findings of the life-saving drug Trump discovered? You’re just attacking her personal views , of the voodoo that she practices in her culture.. Interesting


The link you posted suggests more studies on the effectiveness of the drug. I never said the drug didn't work. I questioned using her as anything more than a laughable example of rushing to put people in front of a camera.

As for cultural practices, does that include her claims that alien dna is being used in medical research? Or her claim that governments have been infiltrated by reptilians who disguise themselves as humans?

If her cultural practices include preaching that dream sex with demons causes gynecological illnesses, it shows her medical knowledge to be tainted. It is that simple. Ovarian cysts, endometriosis and other problems women have can be serious.

OK you’re just gonna continue to troll the black women.. troll somewhere else racist


Trolling means posting just for the reaction. I am ridiculing her for ignoring her medical training in favor of crackpot beliefs.

I think I'll stick around here. You using the democrat's "you're a racist" nonsense is hilarious.

She ignored medical training treating Covid ? Link?


She ignored her medical training. You added the "covid". To my knowledge, she hasn't had any training concerning Covid-19. She is an ER doctor.

Lol she has no Covid training!? Haha A ER DOCTOR HAS NO COVID TRAINING!? Hahaha I’m just going to leave this right here hahaha Hahahahah hahahhha


Do you think they treat Covid-19 in the ER? They diagnose it, and then move them for treatment. Dr. Emmanuel specifically talks wbout how many days they take the drug. Do you think the patient stays in the ER that whole time?

Yea they move them right to elderly facilities. Lol God you might be the stupidest motherfu on here


Do you think they give multi-day treatments in the ER? Do you think they do anything but stabilize and move to another department?

If so, you just took the prize as Dumbass of the Board.

"just??"


Good point. It would be hard to beat the depth of dumbassery he achieved when he claim Dwight Eisenhower's daughter (or granddaughter) emailed him confirming that 34th president was, in fact, Jewish. "She said" they kept it hidden, but Ike was a Jew.

It’s what I was told by Sarah


LMAO!!! Sarah? When you posted it back in April her name was Karen.

If you are going to tell so many lies, you should at least keep track of what you say.

It’s the relationship that we have a nickname that me and the family call her


LMAO!!!! Jeez you are a lousy liar. You'd think, with as much practice as you have had, you would be better at it.
 
They are banning this black woman's voice on Twitter ,,

next time you call republicans racist.
View attachment 368236


Twitter's Jack Dorsey is a piece of shit!....they are banning everything and anything Conservative in Twitter!

Dr. Stella Immanuel knows exactly what she and the Doctors are talking about! she is also asking people who have been cured by Hydroxychloroquine to come forward and tell the rest of the world the truth!

What an amazing woman!:up:




So? Go post on Parler then. You idiots do have choices.



Are you saying Twitter's Jack Dorsey doesn't like the truth?

That Twitter has a problem with a doctor speaking the truth about Hydroxychloroquine?

That Twitter doesn't care about saving lives?

No, I'm saying Twitter is done with folks posting bullshit, especially when such bullshit can be harmful to their members. Rightards can't stand reality so they need to create their own, complete with alternative facts. So now they live in a bubble of their own creation with conservapedia because wikipedia doesn't spread their delusions. Now we have Parler because Twitter doesn't spread their delusions. What's next? Your own NFL?

So like I said, you idiots have choices. So why are you still bitching and moaning about Twitter?



Look at you! Posting links to research like a big boy!

Now this, for future reference, is an actual argument. Much more effective than the "you are attacking her because she is black" nonsense you were apparently copying from the leftists.

You’re the one attacking what she said you’re attacking a board-certified African-American doctor


Yes, I am. Any medical doctor who believes that demons cause illness deserves to be mocked and ridiculed. I stand by that.

But I absolutely reject your claim that I am attacking her because of her race.

So you can’t argue about her findings of the life-saving drug Trump discovered? You’re just attacking her personal views , of the voodoo that she practices in her culture.. Interesting


The link you posted suggests more studies on the effectiveness of the drug. I never said the drug didn't work. I questioned using her as anything more than a laughable example of rushing to put people in front of a camera.

As for cultural practices, does that include her claims that alien dna is being used in medical research? Or her claim that governments have been infiltrated by reptilians who disguise themselves as humans?

If her cultural practices include preaching that dream sex with demons causes gynecological illnesses, it shows her medical knowledge to be tainted. It is that simple. Ovarian cysts, endometriosis and other problems women have can be serious.

OK you’re just gonna continue to troll the black women.. troll somewhere else racist


Trolling means posting just for the reaction. I am ridiculing her for ignoring her medical training in favor of crackpot beliefs.

I think I'll stick around here. You using the democrat's "you're a racist" nonsense is hilarious.

She ignored medical training treating Covid ? Link?


She ignored her medical training. You added the "covid". To my knowledge, she hasn't had any training concerning Covid-19. She is an ER doctor.

Lol she has no Covid training!? Haha A ER DOCTOR HAS NO COVID TRAINING!? Hahaha I’m just going to leave this right here hahaha Hahahahah hahahhha


Do you think they treat Covid-19 in the ER? They diagnose it, and then move them for treatment. Dr. Emmanuel specifically talks wbout how many days they take the drug. Do you think the patient stays in the ER that whole time?

Yea they move them right to elderly facilities. Lol God you might be the stupidest motherfu on here


Do you think they give multi-day treatments in the ER? Do you think they do anything but stabilize and move to another department?

If so, you just took the prize as Dumbass of the Board.

"just??"


Good point. It would be hard to beat the depth of dumbassery he achieved when he claim Dwight Eisenhower's daughter (or granddaughter) emailed him confirming that 34th president was, in fact, Jewish. "She said" they kept it hidden, but Ike was a Jew.

It’s what I was told by Sarah


LMAO!!! Sarah? When you posted it back in April her name was Karen.

If you are going to tell so many lies, you should at least keep track of what you say.

It’s the relationship that we have a nickname that me and the family call her


LMAO!!!! Jeez you are a lousy liar. You'd think, with as much practice as you have had, you would be better at it.


You are thinking that he should be as good as you?
High expectations for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top