Do You Believe We Came From Monkeys?

Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

Yes , wrong. Yes, God made them, God makes everything you dope, even your sorry ass.

What's wrong? You don't just get to say wrong without explaining how I'm wrong. That only tells me I'm actually right but me putting it the way I did embarrassed your stupid little ass.

Are you telling me the first pigs had parents? Then they weren't the first. How did pigs get on this planet?

See friend I'm trying to help you walk it through in your brain. Maybe you haven't logically thought it through. This is why evolution is the truth. No god had to come and wave his hand and magically all the diverse animals were here.

Is Earth Undergoing a 6th Mass Extinction? --"99.9% of all Past Species Extinct"

This means 99% of the animals god made are extinct today.

Yes, wrong. I can say your wrong without explaining, see?
I'm not going to start over from square one with some newby joining the discussion. But at least you are the first in days to proudly admit that you believe a god waved his hand and produced all the animals on earth. Most people don't have the courage to proclaim such ignorance.

But you know what? How can I argue with that. If you are willing to throw out all logic and science and believe such nonsense really what can I say? Nothing. God bless.

Ignorance in your eyes only, I believe I did ask a question much earlier in this thread which no one has even attempted to reply to.....................Evolution and God can exist together, do you know how long a day is to GOD?
I have no problem with that. In that case, one must accept that the Bible is not the literal truth.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!

Why not? Windows, you used, evolutioning since 80x years and have many versions... But do it really grow without any creators from Microsoft?
 
The great apes (gorillae, oranguans, chimpanzees) and humans evolved from a predecessor ape at some point in the distant past. That predecessor ape is extinct.

I always think of the concept of evolution of animals as similar to the evolution of languages. Spanish, Italian, French, and Portuguese all originally came from a predecessor language: Latin. Latin is extinct. The other descendant languages are similar in many ways, but distinctly different.
cute theory.
unproven, however.

What is your proven theory?
I don't have a proven one. Neither do you. That's my point.

Faith is a good thing.

Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.
Now Kosher, I know that it is impossible for you to accept the idea, but 'Theory' in science means something far different than the way you are using it.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!
Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

Who was first - egg or chicken?
 
A feathered dinosaur.

Or, maybe, hydra?

%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B0.jpg
 
cute theory.
unproven, however.

What is your proven theory?
I don't have a proven one. Neither do you. That's my point.

Faith is a good thing.

Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

And yet there are other people who hold the same theory and belief as you, who presents it as TRUTH and FACT.

I hope you take the time to call them out.

Truth and fact are not the same as "proven". Do you not understand these terms, xo?

Things can be true, and factual, before they are actually PROVEN. For example, it is true and factual that gravity exists. It was true and factual before it was proven. It is true and factual that the earth is, indeed, a sphere as stated in the bible. It was true and factual even when the *scientists* were insisting that the earth was flat, and before it was *proven* that the earth is round.

It is true and factual that God created man and is responsible for every thing in the world..including science. It is not proven. See, it doesn't have to be proven for it to be true.
 
What is your proven theory?
I don't have a proven one. Neither do you. That's my point.

Faith is a good thing.

Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

And yet there are other people who hold the same theory and belief as you, who presents it as TRUTH and FACT.

I hope you take the time to call them out.

Truth and fact are not the same as "proven". Do you not understand these terms, xo?

Things can be true, and factual, before they are actually PROVEN. For example, it is true and factual that gravity exists. It was true and factual before it was proven. It is true and factual that the earth is, indeed, a sphere as stated in the bible. It was true and factual even when the *scientists* were insisting that the earth was flat, and before it was *proven* that the earth is round.

It is true and factual that God created man and is responsible for every thing in the world..including science. It is not proven. See, it doesn't have to be proven for it to be true.

Yes. It is true that God created the world is a theory. And it is a fact that God created the world is a theory.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!

Why not? Windows, you used, evolutioning since 80x years and have many versions... But do it really grow without any creators from Microsoft?

That's an excellent analogy!

Now, why don't you keep working on it until you come up with an analogy that actually fits into this discussion.
 
Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

Yes , wrong. Yes, God made them, God makes everything you dope, even your sorry ass.

What's wrong? You don't just get to say wrong without explaining how I'm wrong. That only tells me I'm actually right but me putting it the way I did embarrassed your stupid little ass.

Are you telling me the first pigs had parents? Then they weren't the first. How did pigs get on this planet?

See friend I'm trying to help you walk it through in your brain. Maybe you haven't logically thought it through. This is why evolution is the truth. No god had to come and wave his hand and magically all the diverse animals were here.

Is Earth Undergoing a 6th Mass Extinction? --"99.9% of all Past Species Extinct"

This means 99% of the animals god made are extinct today.

Yes, wrong. I can say your wrong without explaining, see?
I'm not going to start over from square one with some newby joining the discussion. But at least you are the first in days to proudly admit that you believe a god waved his hand and produced all the animals on earth. Most people don't have the courage to proclaim such ignorance.

But you know what? How can I argue with that. If you are willing to throw out all logic and science and believe such nonsense really what can I say? Nothing. God bless.

Ignorance in your eyes only, I believe I did ask a question much earlier in this thread which no one has even attempted to reply to.....................Evolution and God can exist together, do you know how long a day is to GOD?
Since the universe is 14 billion years old and they say god created everything in 7 days I'd say 1 day to god is 2 billion years.

If evolution is accepted in Christianity will you please tell Christians because they don't seem to know this.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!
Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

You think it's impossible to create humans outside the womb?

How anti science of you.

Now I've seen it all - easily the most ignorant poster here just said that god used science to create Adam and Eve.

Hey koshergrl Please post the bible passage that describes the scientific process!

BTW, does it matter that god started with Adam and Eve? Didn't he come back later and, in a temper tantrum, drown every human being on the planet? Then, didn't he leave it some drunk and his very suspicious family relationships to repopulate?
 
The great apes (gorillae, oranguans, chimpanzees) and humans evolved from a predecessor ape at some point in the distant past. That predecessor ape is extinct.

I always think of the concept of evolution of animals as similar to the evolution of languages. Spanish, Italian, French, and Portuguese all originally came from a predecessor language: Latin. Latin is extinct. The other descendant languages are similar in many ways, but distinctly different.
cute theory.
unproven, however.

What is your proven theory?
I don't have a proven one. Neither do you. That's my point.

Faith is a good thing.

Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

That's because yours isn't a theory. At least not a scientific one.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!

Why not? Windows, you used, evolutioning since 80x years and have many versions... But do it really grow without any creators from Microsoft?

That's an excellent analogy!

Now, why don't you keep working on it until you come up with an analogy that actually fits into this discussion.

There are no any proves of human creation by God, or any proves against it. There are no profit for science tasks to think both. So, it's a problem of beliefs.

People, who reject the evolution theory - in fact, heretics. They're trying to force to God, HOW it could make human. Why God couldn't do it through evolution? They impose to God their beliefs, what I can say else? One, who tried to impose his point of view to God - someone, named Lucifer, already got a result...
 
I don't have a proven one. Neither do you. That's my point.

Faith is a good thing.

Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

And yet there are other people who hold the same theory and belief as you, who presents it as TRUTH and FACT.

I hope you take the time to call them out.

Truth and fact are not the same as "proven". Do you not understand these terms, xo?

Things can be true, and factual, before they are actually PROVEN. For example, it is true and factual that gravity exists. It was true and factual before it was proven. It is true and factual that the earth is, indeed, a sphere as stated in the bible. It was true and factual even when the *scientists* were insisting that the earth was flat, and before it was *proven* that the earth is round.

It is true and factual that God created man and is responsible for every thing in the world..including science. It is not proven. See, it doesn't have to be proven for it to be true.

Yes. It is true that God created the world is a theory. And it is a fact that God created the world is a theory.

It's also a fact that God created the world.

Unproven, of course. But just because it's unproven doesn't make it untrue.

It's unproven that you are a butt picking finger sniffer, for example. But everybody knows it's true.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!
Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

You think it's impossible to create humans outside the womb?

How anti science of you.

Now I've seen it all - easily the most ignorant poster here just said that god used science to create Adam and Eve.

Hey koshergrl Please post the bible passage that describes the scientific process!

BTW, does it matter that god started with Adam and Eve? Didn't he come back later and, in a temper tantrum, drown every human being on the planet? Then, didn't he leave it some drunk and his very suspicious family relationships to repopulate?

This isn't science?

Question: "Why did God use Adam's rib to create Eve?"

Answer:
Genesis 2:18–24 tells the well-known account of how God created the first woman by removing a “rib” from Adam’s body and fashioning it into the woman. The creation account clearly indicates that God used Adam’s rib to create Eve instead of making her from the dust of the ground as He had done for Adam.

God apparently had formed male and female animals separately, but the female human was originally part of man—Adam said, “She shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man” (Genesis 2:23).
 
15th post
Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

And yet there are other people who hold the same theory and belief as you, who presents it as TRUTH and FACT.

I hope you take the time to call them out.

Truth and fact are not the same as "proven". Do you not understand these terms, xo?

Things can be true, and factual, before they are actually PROVEN. For example, it is true and factual that gravity exists. It was true and factual before it was proven. It is true and factual that the earth is, indeed, a sphere as stated in the bible. It was true and factual even when the *scientists* were insisting that the earth was flat, and before it was *proven* that the earth is round.

It is true and factual that God created man and is responsible for every thing in the world..including science. It is not proven. See, it doesn't have to be proven for it to be true.

Yes. It is true that God created the world is a theory. And it is a fact that God created the world is a theory.

It's also a fact that God created the world.

Unproven, of course. But just because it's unproven doesn't make it untrue.

It's unproven that you are a butt picking finger sniffer, for example. But everybody knows it's true.

It's not a fact that a god created the universe. That's what religions want you to believe so you put money in the hat as they pass it around.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!

Why not? Windows, you used, evolutioning since 80x years and have many versions... But do it really grow without any creators from Microsoft?

That's an excellent analogy!

Now, why don't you keep working on it until you come up with an analogy that actually fits into this discussion.

There are no any proves of human creation by God, or any proves against it. There are no profit for science tasks to think both. So, it's a problem of beliefs.

People, who reject the evolution theory - in fact, heretics. They're trying to force to God, HOW it could make human. Why God couldn't do it through evolution? They impose to God their beliefs, what I can say else? One, who tried to impose his point of view to God - someone, named Lucifer, already got a result...

Yeah...
 
Therefore, there is just as much chance that I am correct than that you are correct...even though my unproven theory does have some evidence to lend it credibility.

The difference is that I don't present my theory as anything but theory, and my belief.

And yet there are other people who hold the same theory and belief as you, who presents it as TRUTH and FACT.

I hope you take the time to call them out.

Truth and fact are not the same as "proven". Do you not understand these terms, xo?

Things can be true, and factual, before they are actually PROVEN. For example, it is true and factual that gravity exists. It was true and factual before it was proven. It is true and factual that the earth is, indeed, a sphere as stated in the bible. It was true and factual even when the *scientists* were insisting that the earth was flat, and before it was *proven* that the earth is round.

It is true and factual that God created man and is responsible for every thing in the world..including science. It is not proven. See, it doesn't have to be proven for it to be true.

Yes. It is true that God created the world is a theory. And it is a fact that God created the world is a theory.

It's also a fact that God created the world.

Unproven, of course. But just because it's unproven doesn't make it untrue.

It's unproven that you are a butt picking finger sniffer, for example. But everybody knows it's true.

It's also a fact that you want my cock. And if you say, no, you are only proving that you are a liar.
 
How anyone can believe in the creationist theory, I don't know, because it makes no sense to me!
Here is their thinking.

Those were just stories, allegories, parables. Whatever. The fact is who was Adams mother? Christians thing god waved his hand and next thing you know all the land living animals appeared.

So the first animals didn't have parents. God made them.

If I'm wrong one of them will correct me

You think it's impossible to create humans outside the womb?

How anti science of you.

Now I've seen it all - easily the most ignorant poster here just said that god used science to create Adam and Eve.

Hey koshergrl Please post the bible passage that describes the scientific process!

BTW, does it matter that god started with Adam and Eve? Didn't he come back later and, in a temper tantrum, drown every human being on the planet? Then, didn't he leave it some drunk and his very suspicious family relationships to repopulate?

This isn't science?

Question: "Why did God use Adam's rib to create Eve?"

Answer:
Genesis 2:18–24 tells the well-known account of how God created the first woman by removing a “rib” from Adam’s body and fashioning it into the woman. The creation account clearly indicates that God used Adam’s rib to create Eve instead of making her from the dust of the ground as He had done for Adam.

God apparently had formed male and female animals separately, but the female human was originally part of man—Adam said, “She shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man” (Genesis 2:23).

Apparently, men had 13 ribs on one side and 12 on the other. God saw that he fucked up, so he ripped the extra rib out of the man and built a woman around it using various meat scraps and bone fragments from the corner of the cave.

Cool story, bro.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom