Did the networks violate the "Equal Time Rule" by giving DNC 40% more time then RNC?

[healthmyths]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates

 

[jillian]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates

you already tried this lying lunacy.....

and there isn't any equal time requirement....you rightwingnuts got rid of it.

now run along, loony toon.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

 

[konradv]

Haven't you heard, "equal time" is a Commie plot? Besides all cameras are on Trump every time he opens his mouth. I guess they don't want to miss the gaffe that sinks him.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates
View attachment 83715

You already have a failed thread going about this. Why did you start another?

 

[TheOldSchool]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

His viewership was worse than Romney's and McCain's. What does THAT say?

 

[nat4900]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast
Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast

Republican Convention Falls Short of TV Ratings Expectations
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/rnc-ratings-trump.html?_r=0

Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings
Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings

 

[longknife]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast
Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast

Republican Convention Falls Short of TV Ratings Expectations
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/rnc-ratings-trump.html?_r=0

Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings
Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings

From CNN
Trump, by a margin of 2.4 million viewers, according to Nielsen, the TV ratings firm.

Clinton's Thursday night acceptance speech at the DNC averaged 29.8 million viewers across ten broadcast and cable channels.

Trump's speech at the RNC one week earlier averaged 32.2 million viewers across the same channels.

From Forbes
And it might have worked. Trump’s speech last Thursday (notable to many for its length and dark view of America) drew 30 million viewers across the six biggest channels (CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS CBS -3.67% and Fox News Channel) and 32.2 million total viewers including UNI, Fox Business Network, CNBC and NBC Universo. Hillary’s boasted only 28 million viewers across the big six and 29.8 million across all 10.

Once again, a Shrillarybot troll thread.

 

[nat4900]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast
Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast

Republican Convention Falls Short of TV Ratings Expectations
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/us/politics/rnc-ratings-trump.html?_r=0

Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings
Democrats continue to top Republicans in convention ratings

From CNN
Trump, by a margin of 2.4 million viewers, according to Nielsen, the TV ratings firm.

Clinton's Thursday night acceptance speech at the DNC averaged 29.8 million viewers across ten broadcast and cable channels.

Trump's speech at the RNC one week earlier averaged 32.2 million viewers across the same channels.

From Forbes
And it might have worked. Trump’s speech last Thursday (notable to many for its length and dark view of America) drew 30 million viewers across the six biggest channels (CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, CBS CBS -3.67% and Fox News Channel) and 32.2 million total viewers including UNI, Fox Business Network, CNBC and NBC Universo. Hillary’s boasted only 28 million viewers across the big six and 29.8 million across all 10.

Once again, a Shrillarybot troll thread.

Soooooo, you're choosing to NOT determine viewership for the 2 CONVENTIONS.....
Instead you want to concentrate on the acceptance speeches of Trump and Clinton for viewership, correct?

Of course you do realize (or should) that viewership of reality shows will always beat the audience to a PBS instructional show or CSPAN.

 

[jillian]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

actually that's a lie.... the dem convention had better ratings.

and dumb donalnd had lower ratings than both romney and mccain.

you're welcome

 

[guno]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates
View attachment 83715

ahhh poor RWNJ

r

 

[healthmyths]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates

you already tried this lying lunacy.....

and there isn't any equal time requirement....you rightwingnuts got rid of it.

now run along, loony toon.

Don't believe a thing you write because YOU don't prove it with substantiating material!
See this is why people like you are never believed. You make up crap and never back up it up because there is nothing to prove your idiocy!
Prove IT!!!! Do a little research and prove it! Geez unless you don't know how to use the Internet!

 

[oreo]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates
View attachment 83715

LOL--at RNC convention--you had 4 soap box opera stars, one washed up NFL quarterback, a wrestler and 1 Haines underwear model and the rest was filled with 2 hour breaks because they couldn't get enough speakers to fill the venue. So if you expected the media to show 2 hours of empty seats in the arena after every speaker that's what you would be looking at.

The DNC convention was back to back speeches--from congressmen, senators, policemen, a 4 star general, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Republicans endorsing Hillary Clinton, so there was a lot to cover, and if they got more time, that is the reason why.

 

[oreo]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

actually that's a lie.... the dem convention had better ratings.

and dumb donalnd had lower ratings than both romney and mccain.

you're welcome

Republicans already know who they're going to vote for. And when Republicans are losing the white educated vote for the 1st time in 60 years--they aren't going to watch this idiot and his show--LOL They already know who he is.
Trump May Become The First Republican In 60 Years To Lose White College Graduates

So what they did is tune into the DNC convention where there was Republican speak all the way through, to attract those millions of moderates within the party.

And they're going to get them with this guy endorsing Hillary Clinton.

 

[jillian]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

actually that's a lie.... the dem convention had better ratings.

and dumb donalnd had lower ratings than both romney and mccain.

you're welcome

Republicans already know who they're going to vote for. And when Republicans are losing the white educated vote for the 1st time in 60 years--they aren't going to watch this idiot and his show--LOL They already know who he is.
Trump May Become The First Republican In 60 Years To Lose White College Graduates

So what they did is tune into the DNC convention where there was Republican speak all the way through, to attract those millions of moderates within the party.

you'd think donald would have figured out that you have to move center to win a national election.

 

[oreo]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

His viewership was worse than Romney's and McCain's. What does THAT say?

Donald Trump really actually babbled and rambled for 36 minutes the rest were chants of "lock her up."--so I don't how many people could stand to listen to that for more than 5 minutes

"For the second night in a row, the Democratic National Convention beat the Republican convention in total TV viewership. The second night of the Democratic convention, featuring a primetime address by former President Bill Clinton, drew 24.7 million viewers according to data released by Nielsen. This is a slight decline from the 26.0 million who watched the first night of the DNC.

In comparison, the second night of the Republican convention drew 19.8 million viewers, a decline from the 23.0 million who tuned in on the first night.

The relative success of the Democratic convention is a surprise to producers and executives who expected that Donald Trump’s unpredictability and reality television experience would draw viewers. But as Trump planned his convention, many of his ideas to make the convention more entertaining–such as announcing his vice presidential nominee during the convention–were abandoned."
DNC Continues To Beat The RNC In TV Ratings

 

[oreo]

And Trump still beat her in viewership... What does that say?

actually that's a lie.... the dem convention had better ratings.

and dumb donalnd had lower ratings than both romney and mccain.

you're welcome

Republicans already know who they're going to vote for. And when Republicans are losing the white educated vote for the 1st time in 60 years--they aren't going to watch this idiot and his show--LOL They already know who he is.
Trump May Become The First Republican In 60 Years To Lose White College Graduates

So what they did is tune into the DNC convention where there was Republican speak all the way through, to attract those millions of moderates within the party.

you'd think donald would have figured out that you have to move center to win a national election.

Those were the days of the former Republican party. This party is not the party of Lincoln or Reagan. It's the Trump party of anger, fear, ignorance, bigotry. Basically an all white mob. Very reminiscent of something that came right out of the 1960's civil rights movement.

Really Republican Doug Elmets explained it very well. As a life long Republican,he hits it right on the nail in 3 minutes.

 

[healthmyths]

Well the issue is that the networks violated the Equal Time Rule... when they gave the DNC 40% more coverage...

The equal-time rule specifies that U.S. radio and television broadcast stations must provide an equivalent opportunity to any opposing political candidates who request it. This means, for example, that if a station gives one free minute to a candidate on the prime time, it must do the same for another candidate.
However, there are four exceptions: if the air-time was in a documentary, bona fide news interview, scheduled newscast or an on-the-spot news event the equal-time rule is not valid. Since 1983, political debates not hosted by the media station are considered news events, thus may include only major-party candidates without having to offer air time to minor-party or independent candidates. Talk shows and other regular news programming from syndicators, such as Entertainment Tonight, are declared exempt from the rule by the FCC on a case-on-case basis.[1]
This rule originated in § 18 of the Radio Act of 1927 [1]. It was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, where the Equal Time Rule is codified as § 315(a).
Federal Communications Commission: Investigate the major networks violation of the FCC's "Equal-time rule"

The head of the Federal Communications Commission promised Thursday to enforce his agency’s regulations requiring television stations to give political candidates equal opportunities for airtime.

“The rules are pretty clear. Rules are rules,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler told reporters.
“I hope that we have developed a reputation as folks who enforce the rules.”

Hillary Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on Saturday Night Live could trigger the so-called “equal-time” rules, as could Donald Trump’s plan to host the long-running NBC comedy show next month. That doesn’t necessarily mean Lincoln Chafee will be the next host of SNL—but it could mean that local NBC affiliates across the country will have to give presidential candidates access to equal TV time.

Under a law passed in 1934, the FCC requires broadcast television and radio stations (but not cable channels) to give equal opportunities to “legally qualified” candidates. The law exempts news programs, which the FCC has broadly interpreted to include talk shows like The Tonight Show.

FCC Chief Vows to Require “Equal Time” on TV for Candidates
View attachment 83715

LOL--at RNC convention--you had 4 soap box opera stars, one washed up NFL quarterback, a wrestler and 1 Haines underwear model and the rest was filled with 2 hour breaks because they couldn't get enough speakers to fill the venue. So if you expected the media to show 2 hours of empty seats in the arena after every speaker that's what you would be looking at.

The DNC convention was back to back speeches--from congressmen, senators, policemen, a 4 star general, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Republicans endorsing Hillary Clinton, so there was a lot to cover, and if they got more time, that is the reason why.

YOUR opinion! NO FACTS... Nothing but personal subjective opinion. Give me FACTS and until you do, you are meaningless.

 

[idb]

Chachi finally got his chance to jump the shark.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dem's need a lot more time to spin their web of lies.