ABC News Violated US Law Against Censoring Presidential Candidates When it Censored RFK Jr.'s Attack on COVID Vaccines

[scruffy]

Incorrect. 1A guarantees his legal right to voice any opinion.

You're talking to a leftard.

You know, the censors.

Leftards dont like public discussion.

 

[Skylar]

Incorrect. 1A guarantees his legal right to voice any opinion.

Neither the interviewer nor station are under any obligation to transmit his opinion.

Check the 1st word of the 1st amendment. Spoiler Alert, its not "ABC News".

 

[SeaMajor7]

when you see bull shit ya just got to point it out … here we were having thousands of people dying every day here in the U.S. and the world … you with your brilliants can’t understand how the shot worked … you deserved to watch you and your family die from your stupidity … as soon as the Covid-19 shot became avaible To the people they dying rate started to slow down to where hardly anyone is dying from covid-19 … the only people dying is stupid republicans like you.. who refuse to get a shot … that’s fine … when you’re laying in the hospital hoses in every part of your body … I get to sit here vaccinated and watch another stupid republicans and his family die…

Asshole, they changed the very definition of the word VACCINE to accommodate your "shot".
I deserve to DIE for YOUR DECEPTION???????

 

[Catsnmeters]

For what?

The Trump vaccine seems to be killing people.

 

[Orangecat]

Neither the interviewer nor station are under any obligation to transmit his opinion.

That wasn't my contention. Learn to read.
Here's the post I responded to:

Kennedy has access to media, but not does have a legal right to spread QAnon nonsense.

 

[Orangecat]

The Trump vaccine seems to be killing people.

Did it kill you?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Did it kill you?

No.

Do you always base your opinions on someone else's personal anecdotes?

 

[Orangecat]

No.

Then STFU, you dumb hypocrite.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Then STFU, you dumb hypocrite.

So you do base your opinions on personal anecdotes.

Good to know.

 

[Orangecat]

So you do base your opinions on personal anecdotes.

Good to know.

Keep guessing, chump. I'll let you know when you're correct.

 

[Skylar]

Well, since the entire premise of this thread is meaningless horseshit, what else is there to discuss?

 

[jc456]

You should have kept reading the statute. Want to post the very next few sentences that destroy this argument?

why didn't you just do that?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Keep guessing, chump. I'll let you know when you're correct.

A poll of one is your motto.

Have a nice day.

 

[Skylar]

why didn't you just do that?

Why didn't you read the statute? There was a link to it and everything.

Oh, that's right. You don't read and you don't research.

 

[Orangecat]

A poll of one is your motto.

Incorrect. My motto is "buy low, sell high".

Have a nice day.

I always do.

 

[Skylar]

So with no one even attempting to defend the horseshit premise of the OP, is there anything left to discuss?