Did anti-Trump FBI cost him the win by election interference?

Democrats: the guy who sat in his basement and hardly campaigned or did press conferences, to hide his weak and failing mental state, somehow got the most votes in the history of this country. And now, a majority of those very same people, only two years later into Biden’s presidency, disapprove of how he’s doing as president.

Talk about selling a bullshit narrative.

And yet, there are still crazy leftists on this forum still Insisting that Biden won honestly - and that he was better than Trump.

i can only hope that they represent the outliers and that the majority of voters will speak up so loudly on Election Day that massive cheating by Democrats can’t overcome the lead.
 
And yet, there are still crazy leftists on this forum still Insisting that Biden won honestly - and that he was better than Trump.

i can only hope that they represent the outliers and that the majority of voters will speak up so loudly on Election Day that massive cheating by Democrats can’t overcome the lead.
So says the Cult
 
"Deflection."
No, poster Lisa, my post about Tony Fabrizio was not a deflection from your conspiracy theory that the FBI delivered the vote to Biden.
Rather, it was a widely reported development that had credibility because......because......it came from Trump's own camp.
In short, think of the ethos of improved credibility when one's own court testimony is against one's own interest. Meaning, Trump's own camp developed this information. Not some imagined 'enemy'. Trump's own camp went out looking for why he lost....and when they found out why -- it was detailed in a 27-page report that you can read, even today, if you open the link to the 27-page report.

And too, poster Lisa, there is a credible argument to be made that the 'deflection' card is being played by those who say...the FBI helped Joe; Cesar Chavez helped Joe; Italian satellites helped Joe; Dominion tabulators helped Joe; the US Postal Service helped Joe; dead-people voting helped Joe.

There seems to be an endless line-up of conspiracies as to the nefarious actions by others that led to the firing of Don Trump.

Lisa, you may be more comfortable, maybe more effective in your arguments over on these forums:

Go find your people, poster Lisa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail in ballots are outlawed in many Western nations like France,.....
However, NOT in 8 American states.
States that have long allowed all election to be conducted by mail-in ballots: Uta, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, California, Washington, and Colorado.


There was no way our voting system could reliably check the millions of ballots,.....
See the 8 states mentioned above. They seem to be confident and competent in counting the millions of votes they receive via mail-in ballots.
So there is that.


So you’re saying that it’s only people who follow the news and are knowledgeable about politics who realize that the FBI changed the outcome of the election?

I can't speak for the poster you address the rhetorical question above.

But I think a not inappropriate response would be that the 'conspiracists'-nutjob world are the only ones who imagine the FBI delivered the loss to Don Trump.

As mentioned before......Tony Fabrizio told us: Don Trump's untrustworthiness and incompetence delivered the loss. Joe hardly needed the FBI, or Hugo Chavez, or MSNBC to beat Trump.

Don Trump beat Don Trump.
 
Last edited:
Trump is not inept. He had to go through a maze of swamp creatures even forced on his administration to bring any advances with limits.
Do those "swamp creatures" include the 5 inspectors general he fired for having the audacity to investigate Trump's nefarious acts?

 
The thread is only 10 minutes old, and already the leftists are jumping onboard to deflect from the topic.
No so much deflecting as showing your premise to be unsubstantiated lunacy.
 
".....Dr. Jill the let them eat cake slut."
And the above is from one of the proud graduates of the Trump University school of Public Decorum and Civic Grace.
Are all Trumpettes proud of the profanity and misogyny that gets demonstrated on this venue by other Trumpettes?
 
Nope….that’s another lie, but don’t deflect. The topic is how a government agency, funded by taxpayers, both Democrats and Republicans, decided they wanted the Democrat to win and worked with the media to suppress damaging information about it.
It is disappointing, but not surprising, that you swallowed Faux's propagandizing of this story whole. The FBI warning FB about Russian disinformation in the coming election cycle because Russia used FB's platform so successfully in 2016 unequivocally does not show any coordination with FB to suppress the laptop story. You've been duped as MAGAnuts have been so many times before.
 
There’s continuing debate about the extent of “cheating” in the 2020 election - with unprecedented midnight halts across half-a-dozen swing states, questionable means of “curing” ballots to Biden’s advantage, a large, paid “army” of liberal activists (by Zuckerberg) to harvest ballots from ignorant or gullible voters, etc. - but was the FBI’s actions in coordinating with Zuckerberg to suppress the Hunter laptop story sufficient alone to cost Trump the win?

Of course, and it’s shameful. The FBI, having failed with its Russian conspiracy to oust a duly elected president, decided it would make sure he was not re-elected. Polls show that anywhere from 10% (the low end) to one out of six (the high end) would not have voted for Biden had they known about the story. That’s a total swing of at least 8 million votes, and with less than 50,000 in swing states deciding the election, it’s apparent that the FBI conspired with the media to hide the truth from American voters, and effectively disenfranchise 74 million Americans.


LOL If we Dems were able to "cheat" when you guys were in power, what makes you think we can't cheat when our guy is in power? ;)

And, that is exactly what we have done. We have fixed the 2022 midterm, 2024 presidential, and beyond.

So, my advice to Repubs? Stay home. We. Got. This. :auiqs.jpg:
 
It is disappointing, but not surprising, that you swallowed Faux's propagandizing of this story whole. The FBI warning FB about Russian disinformation in the coming election cycle because Russia used FB's platform so successfully in 2016 unequivocally does not show any coordination with FB to suppress the laptop story. You've been duped as MAGAnuts have been so many times before.
It is disappointing, but not surprising, that you deny what Zuckerberg admitted: that he was warned by the FBI to suppress a story that would be damaging to Biden, and likely cost him the election.

And your insulting, childish name-calling like MAGAnuts show how effectively the liberal media has been in duping you to believe that the people who disagree with you are stupid or inferior.
 
LOL If we Dems were able to "cheat" when you guys were in power, what makes you think we can't cheat when our guy is in power? ;)

And, that is exactly what we have done. We have fixed the 2022 midterm, 2024 presidential, and beyond.

So, my advice to Repubs? Stay home. We. Got. This. :auiqs.jpg:
You weren’t able to cheat a win to the Virginia governorship. That’s because we were ready for the cheating and shenanigans. Same with 2022.
 
Because he did. Your problem being you can't prove he didn't.
Your problem is that you deny the obvious:

1) Zuckerberg admitted that the FBI wanted him to suppress the negative news story on Biden, which he did. Fully 80 million Facebook users were thus deprived of an opportunity to learn the truth of Hunter’s bribes from the Communist Party, and 10% to the Big Guy.

2) Polls have shown that between 10% and 15% of uninformed voters who went for Biden would NOT have done so if they had learned about the story that the liberal media suppressed.
 
And the above is from one of the proud graduates of the Trump University school of Public Decorum and Civic Grace.
Are all Trumpettes proud of the profanity and misogyny that gets demonstrated on this venue by other Trumpettes?
I am tired of paying for others. And the era of inflation now is a perfect example.
 
There’s continuing debate about the extent of “cheating” in the 2020 election - with unprecedented midnight halts across half-a-dozen swing states, questionable means of “curing” ballots to Biden’s advantage, a large, paid “army” of liberal activists (by Zuckerberg) to harvest ballots from ignorant or gullible voters, etc. - but was the FBI’s actions in coordinating with Zuckerberg to suppress the Hunter laptop story sufficient alone to cost Trump the win?

Of course, and it’s shameful. The FBI, having failed with its Russian conspiracy to oust a duly elected president, decided it would make sure he was not re-elected. Polls show that anywhere from 10% (the low end) to one out of six (the high end) would not have voted for Biden had they known about the story. That’s a total swing of at least 8 million votes, and with less than 50,000 in swing states deciding the election, it’s apparent that the FBI conspired with the media to hide the truth from American voters, and effectively disenfranchise 74 million Americans.


Did the NFL getting involved in the Patriot's cheating cost the Patriot's a couple more Superbowls?
 
Putting aside that the only debate about "cheating" is among Trump acolytes who refuse to accept the reality of his defeat...........your premise appears to be based on the poll you cited (from a disreputable firm) fatuously claiming the outcome of the election would have been altered if the Hunter Biden laptop story had been covered more thoroughly.

However, note the slight of hand in reference to the people who were polled.

Nearly four of five Americans who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that “truthful” coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, according to a new poll.

Get back to me when you have a poll indicating the outcome of the election would have been affected that was taken among the general voting public, or Biden voters. Because people who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal were already predisposed to support the Orange Insurrectionist.
Lol, had that supposed laptop since 2019 while Trump was president and his appointment was head of the FBI but Trumps own appointment covered it up. Hilarious. What a retard. Again Trump's appointment was the one who rigged the election. Again slobbering retard and even more Hilarious. Yall got Hilarious retarded accusations and absolutely no proof. We got hundreds of court wins. We have hundreds upon hundreds of Trump's retards in jail. You have nothing but ludicrous nonsense accusations. Hilarious the repugs are flat retarded.
 
It is disappointing, but not surprising, that you deny what Zuckerberg admitted: that he was warned by the FBI to suppress a story that would be damaging to Biden, and likely cost him the election.
He admitted no such thing. He was warned about Russia spreading misinformation by the FBI. Full stop.

The Facebook cofounder said the FBI is a "legitimate institution" and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously." The story was allowed to remain on Facebook, albeit with limited exposure, Zuckerberg said.

In a statement Friday night, the FBI said it has provided companies with “foreign threat indicators” to help protect their platforms and customers, but that it “cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received.”

“The FBI routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats,” the agency said.

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top