Did anti-Trump FBI cost him the win by election interference?

[berg80]

Your problem is that you deny the obvious:

1) Zuckerberg admitted that the FBI wanted him to suppress the negative news story on Biden, which he did. Fully 80 million Facebook users were thus deprived of an opportunity to learn the truth of Hunter’s bribes from the Communist Party, and 10% to the Big Guy.

2) Polls have shown that between 10% and 15% of uninformed voters who went for Biden would NOT have done so if they had learned about the story that the liberal media suppressed.

Nothing about that post is remotely true.

The Facebook cofounder said the FBI is a "legitimate institution" and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously." The story was allowed to remain on Facebook, albeit with limited exposure, Zuckerberg said.

In a statement Friday night, the FBI said it has provided companies with “foreign threat indicators” to help protect their platforms and customers, but that it “cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received.”

“The FBI routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats,” the agency said.

FBI responds to Mark Zuckerberg claims in Joe Rogan show​

Zuckerberg told Rogan that Facebook limited the exposure of a story ahead of the 2020 election after the FBI warned him to beware of polarizing content.

www.nbcnews.com


The question you need to be asking yourself is how you came to your conclusions since they don't come close to reflecting the facts.

 

[Lisa558]

He admitted no such thing. He was warned about Russia spreading misinformation by the FBI. Full stop.

The Facebook cofounder said the FBI is a "legitimate institution" and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously." The story was allowed to remain on Facebook, albeit with limited exposure, Zuckerberg said.

In a statement Friday night, the FBI said it has provided companies with “foreign threat indicators” to help protect their platforms and customers, but that it “cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received.”

“The FBI routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats,” the agency said.

FBI responds to Mark Zuckerberg claims in Joe Rogan show

Zuckerberg told Rogan that Facebook limited the exposure of a story ahead of the 2020 election after the FBI warned him to beware of polarizing content.

www.nbcnews.com

That’s what I said. Zuckerberg suppressed a negative story that would make Biden look bad, after being warned by the FBI to do so.

And the FBI called it “polarizing content”? That just means it might make people vote the other way, should the truth come out.

And what business does the biased, anti-Trump FBI have instructing social media to suppress stories that they deem polarizing anyway? They certainly didn’t suppress - just the opposite! - the Russia conspiracy hoax.

 

[berg80]

Your problem is that you deny the obvious:

1) Zuckerberg admitted that the FBI wanted him to suppress the negative news story on Biden, which he did. Fully 80 million Facebook users were thus deprived of an opportunity to learn the truth of Hunter’s bribes from the Communist Party, and 10% to the Big Guy.

Meta on Friday night responded to the FBI statement via Twitter. “The FBI shared general warnings about foreign interference — nothing specific about Hunter Biden," the statement said.

You have to stop allowing yourself to be deceived.

The question you need to be asking yourself is how you came to your conclusions since they don't come close to reflecting the facts.

 

[berg80]

That’s what I said. Zuckerberg suppressed a negative story that would make Biden look bad, after being warned by the FBI to do so.

That is factually incorrect. Read the FBI's and Zuckerberg's post interview comments again.

 

[berg80]

Did the NFL getting involved in the Patriot's cheating cost the Patriot's a couple more Superbowls?

21 Scientists Say Tom Brady Is Right And The NFL Is Wrong

Annoyed scientists attack the NFL's bogus Deflategate claims.

www.huffpost.com

True Scandal of Deflategate Lies in the N.F.L.’s Behavior​

True Scandal of Deflategate Lies in the N.F.L.’s Behavior (Published 2016)

A scientific consensus that deflation of footballs in the 2015 A.F.C. title game could be explained by physics has not done anything to mitigate the Patriots’ punishment.

www.nytimes.com

MIT Professor Proves Deflategate Was a Hoax

Even though the absolute train wreck of a disaster we call Deflategate is finally over, it's still hard to let it go. It's ironic, as Patriots fans and haters...

www.12up.com

 

[TNHarley]

Trump was unpopular
He never won the popular vote in two elections and never had above 50 percent approval

Rather than try to expand his base, he doubled down pandering to his MAGA base

Cost him Bigly

he had the second most votes ever in 2020. That would be expanding his base. Tard.

 

[berg80]

he had the second most votes ever in 2020. That would be expanding his base. Tard.

That would be due to higher voter turnout, tard.

 

[TNHarley]

That would be due to higher voter turnout, tard.

Because his base expanded?
Good gawd, where do they dig you morons up from?

 

[Lisa558]

21 Scientists Say Tom Brady Is Right And The NFL Is Wrong

Annoyed scientists attack the NFL's bogus Deflategate claims.

www.huffpost.com

True Scandal of Deflategate Lies in the N.F.L.’s Behavior​

True Scandal of Deflategate Lies in the N.F.L.’s Behavior (Published 2016)

A scientific consensus that deflation of footballs in the 2015 A.F.C. title game could be explained by physics has not done anything to mitigate the Patriots’ punishment.

www.nytimes.com

MIT Professor Proves Deflategate Was a Hoax

Even though the absolute train wreck of a disaster we call Deflategate is finally over, it's still hard to let it go. It's ironic, as Patriots fans and haters...

www.12up.com

My question was whether the FBI cost Trump the win by interfering with the election, and they did. In an effort to keep the Hunter story suppressed, they warned the media giant about “Russian disinformation” - and their warning “fit” the Hunter story, and Zuckerberg hid it from the voting public.

The NYT and WaPo also suppressed the story, even though they now admit that it was true.

The media has become the enemy of the people.

 

[Lisa558]

That would be due to higher voter turnout, tard.

Trump voters turned out. Millions of Biden votes were harvested from the ignorant and gullible by Zuckerberg’s army.

 

[TNHarley]

The media has become the enemy of the people

"has" become? Where have you been hiding? lol

 

[MinTrut]

There’s continuing debate about the extent of “cheating” in the 2020 election - with unprecedented midnight halts across half-a-dozen swing states, questionable means of “curing” ballots to Biden’s advantage, a large, paid “army” of liberal activists (by Zuckerberg) to harvest ballots from ignorant or gullible voters, etc. - but was the FBI’s actions in coordinating with Zuckerberg to suppress the Hunter laptop story sufficient alone to cost Trump the win?

Of course, and it’s shameful. The FBI, having failed with its Russian conspiracy to oust a duly elected president, decided it would make sure he was not re-elected. Polls show that anywhere from 10% (the low end) to one out of six (the high end) would not have voted for Biden had they known about the story. That’s a total swing of at least 8 million votes, and with less than 50,000 in swing states deciding the election, it’s apparent that the FBI conspired with the media to hide the truth from American voters, and effectively disenfranchise 74 million Americans.

FBI blasted after Zuckerberg revealed their warning ahead of the Hunter Biden laptop story: ‘Collusion'

Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed on The Joe Rogan Experience that Facebook censored information about Hunter Biden's laptop after an FBI tip about Russian disinfo.

www.foxnews.com

Shock Poll: 8 in 10 Think Biden Laptop Coverup Changed Election

www.theepochtimes.com

The FBI must be 100% defunded, and all conspirators therein charged with sedition.

 

[Lisa558]

"has" become? Where have you been hiding? lol

True, it’s always been biased on the lib side. But they weren’t the bald faced liars they are today, turning against half the country With such venom. Turn on MSNBC - have the Pepcid ready - and be blown away.

 

[TNHarley]

True, it’s always been biased on the lib side. But they weren’t the bald faced liars they are today, turning against half the country With such venom. Turn on MSNBC - have the Pepcid ready - and be blown away.

no thanks lolz

 

[berg80]

Because his base expanded?
Good gawd, where do they dig you morons up from?

Do you understand the meaning of higher voter turnout and the implications for a candidate's vote total? I don't think you do.

 

[TNHarley]

Do you understand the meaning of higher voter turnout and the implications for a candidate's vote total? I don't think you do.

So people were voting for trump that didnt support him. Gotcha
What kind of dumbass doesnt understand what higher voter turnout implies?

 

[berg80]

True, it’s always been biased on the lib side. But they weren’t the bald faced liars they are today, turning against half the country With such venom. Turn on MSNBC - have the Pepcid ready - and be blown away.

For you to make that remark when your premise, that FB was told to suppress the laptop story by the FBI, has been irrefutably and directly denied by Zuckerberg (and the FBI) puts on full display your obstinance when it comes to accepting objective facts that contradict your beliefs.

 

[surada]

You, like all the leftists on this thread, are ignoring that one out of six votes that went for Biden would NOT have If the FBI didn’t collide with Zuckerberg to hide the story.

It’s not just Trump saying it. The people who were manipulated into voting for Biden are saying it.

Trump is an immoral pig who mocks everything you believe in.

 

[TNHarley]

Trump is an immoral pig who mocks everything you believe in.

an immoral pig that didnt shower with his daughter, or follow her to bathroom while she pisses

 

[surada]

So people were voting for trump that didnt support him. Gotcha
What kind of dumbass doesnt understand what higher voter turnout implies?

Georgia registered over 350,000 first time voters who voted against Trump.