DHS report says 2 agents fired weapons in Alex Pretti shooting

[Lesh]

"Better than him bullets in them"

Isn't

"Pretti is going to kill cops in the future"

Ummmm… yeah it is stupid

 

[OODA_Loop]

“Hidden gun”?

It was in a holster on his hip

“Hi cap magazines “?

He had one in the gun and one spare. Neither were “hi cap”

Stop lying

Under his jacket is hidden

A high capacity magazine in the loaded, hidden gun + one spare hidden high capacity magazine = two hidden high capacity magazines

A SIG320 AXG magazine holds 21 rounds with one round in the chamber.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Under his jacket is hidden

A high capacity magazine in the loaded, hidden gun + one spare hidden high capacity magazine = two hidden high capacity magazines

A SIG320 AXG magazine holds 21 rounds with one round in the chamber.

.

It's really obvious that he/she/it knows nothing about firearms.

Are we worried?

.

 

[Lesh]

Under his jacket is hidden

A high capacity magazine in the loaded, hidden gun + one spare hidden high capacity magazine = two hidden high capacity magazines

A SIG320 AXG magazine holds 21 rounds with one round in the chamber.

A. Again. On his hip. Legalof course because even there he had a concealed carry permit

B. That is the standard mag for that weapon. Stop trying to make it sound nefarious

 

[OODA_Loop]

Ummmm… yeah it is stupid

It means he had the ability to kill them with his hidden weapon which he brought to a confrontation with them.

Then in the physical altercation it is better they shot him before he had the chance to shoot a kill law enforcement.

Why did he bring the gun?

 

[Lesh]

It means he had the ability to kill them with his hidden weapon which he brought to a confrontation with them.

Then in the physical altercation it is better they shot him before he had the chance to shoot a kill law enforcement.

Why did he bring the gun?

So you recommend that LE shoot anyone who has the ability to shoot them?

Millions who conceal carry and open carry might take issue with that

Why did he bring a gun?

Because he is legally allowed to

Why do the millions of others do so?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It means he had the ability to kill them with his hidden weapon which he brought to a confrontation with them.

Then in the physical altercation it is better they shot him before he had the chance to shoot a kill law enforcement.

Why did he bring the gun?

.

Why would anyone bring a gun to an event where they knew they would become engaged with MANY people with guns?

.

 

[JoeB131]

It means he had the ability to kill them with his hidden weapon which he brought to a confrontation with them.

Then in the physical altercation it is better they shot him before he had the chance to shoot a kill law enforcement.

Why did he bring the gun?

Why do you hate the Second Amendment?

Why did THIS guy bring a gun.

or these two idiots

Or these guys.

 

[OODA_Loop]

A. Again. On his hip. Legalof course because even there he had a concealed carry permit

B. That is the standard mag for that weapon. Stop trying to make it sound nefarious

The legality of the weapon is not at issue [from reports at least not yet]

The armed confrontation and physical altercation is.

 

[Lesh]

The legality of the weapon is not at issue [from reports at least not yet]

The armed confrontation and physical altercation is.

See the post above yours you moron

 

[OODA_Loop]

Why do you hate the Second Amendment?

Why did THIS guy bring a gun.

View attachment 1213360

or these two idiots

View attachment 1213361

Or these guys.

View attachment 1213362

The people in the top two images all got arrested, tried and convicted. Most importantly they didn't provoke and participate in physical altercation with LE and live today. It is a shame Pretti was so reckless.

Not familiar with those in 3rd image.

 

[OODA_Loop]

See the post above yours you moron

The people in the top two images all got arrested, tried and convicted. Most importantly they didn't provoke and participate in physical altercation with LE and live today. It is a shame Pretti was so reckless.

Not familiar with those in 3rd image

 

[JoeB131]

The people in the top two images all got arrested, tried and convicted. Most importantly they didn't provoke and participate in physical altercation with LE and live today. It is a shame Pretti was so reckless.

Not familiar with those in 3rd image.

I think you are confused.

Rittenhouse wasn't convicted.
The McCloskeys were never put on trial and plead guilty to a misdemeanor (which was later pardoned by the governor)
The nuts at the Michigan Capitol weren't arrested at all.

The point is, none of these people, who were brandishing weapons (and one of whom shot three people) were shot by police.

Pretti wasn't even brandishing his weapon. It had been taken from him before he was shot 10 times.

 

[Lockback]

I think you are confused.

Rittenhouse wasn't convicted.
The McCloskeys were never put on trial and plead guilty to a misdemeanor (which was later pardoned by the governor)
The nuts at the Michigan Capitol weren't arrested at all.

The point is, none of these people, who were brandishing weapons (and one of whom shot three people) were shot by police.

Pretti wasn't even brandishing his weapon. It had been taken from him before he was shot 10 times.

None were shot by police ...


... because they didn't engage with the police.

 

[OODA_Loop]

The point is, none of these people, who were brandishing weapons (and one of whom shot three people) were shot by police.

The point is none of them got into a physical altercation with LE like Pretti did with hidden weapons.

That is what got Pretti shot.

 

[JoeB131]

None were shot by police ...


... because they didn't engage with the police

No, the police just ignored their actions.

Take Rittenhouse. After he shot three people, he walked past six police cars, lights blazing, responding to a report of a shooting, and NONE of them thought, "Hey, maybe we should arrest that fat kid with the gun!"

 

[Lockback]

The point is none of them got into a physical altercation with LE like Pretti did with hidden weapons.

That is what got Pretti shot.

He's not bright enough to connect the dots.

 

[Lesh]

None were shot by police ...


... because they didn't engage with the police.

Killer Kyle certainly did

 

[Lockback]

No, the police just ignored their actions.

Take Rittenhouse. After he shot three people, he walked past six police cars, lights blazing, responding to a report of a shooting, and NONE of them thought, "Hey, maybe we should arrest that fat kid with the gun!"

They were in a full riot scenario. Lots of shit going on all around them.
And Rittenhouse was arrested so I guess that sort of shoots down your dumb theory.

 

[OODA_Loop]

No, the police just ignored their actions.

Take Rittenhouse. After he shot three people, he walked past six police cars, lights blazing, responding to a report of a shooting, and NONE of them thought, "Hey, maybe we should arrest that fat kid with the gun!"

If true, what relevance does this have regarding Pretti's decisions and actions the day he was killed?