Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My point is due to this:Why did you leave this out? It was the following paragraph explaining why they couldn't have sent air supportWhat I read:
Military leaders decided early on that jets armed with 500-pound bombs were unsuited for the chaotic crisis in an urban area.
"Ultimately, it was my decision that said no, not the right response in this circumstance," Ham said.
Brig. Gen. Scott Zobrist, then the wing commander at Aviano, had similar worries. He said that, even if called right away, it would have taken 20 hours to get jets to Benghazi from the base in Italy normally used for training flights.
Pilots would have to be recalled from their homes, bombs loaded onto planes, the 1,000-mile route planned. The jets would need refueling along the way, which meant coordinating with tanker planes stationed in England — something that typically takes days to plan.
That's because as the General explained, it would have taken 20 hours to respond.My point is due to this:
Military leaders decided early on that jets armed with 500-pound bombs were unsuited for the chaotic crisis in an urban area.
They didn't even prepare part 2 so as to execute such a plan.
Dumbfuck, you started by claiming she deleted emails in connection with Benghazi. That implies guilt. And if that wasn't implicating enough, you then posted, "The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks."I never blamed Clinton your fat fuck suffering OCD idiot. My point was that security was lacking.
Same reason he left out half of a quote from the Democrats' report, then when caught, denied saying anything about any report. Pesky details are too inconvenient for his diatribe.Why did you leave this out? It was the following paragraph explaining why they couldn't have sent air supportWhat I read:
Military leaders decided early on that jets armed with 500-pound bombs were unsuited for the chaotic crisis in an urban area.
"Ultimately, it was my decision that said no, not the right response in this circumstance," Ham said.
Brig. Gen. Scott Zobrist, then the wing commander at Aviano, had similar worries. He said that, even if called right away, it would have taken 20 hours to get jets to Benghazi from the base in Italy normally used for training flights.
Pilots would have to be recalled from their homes, bombs loaded onto planes, the 1,000-mile route planned. The jets would need refueling along the way, which meant coordinating with tanker planes stationed in England — something that typically takes days to plan.
It seems to be a common trait. To post half of a citation, leave out the important part that changes the meaning of the first half.Same reason he left out half of a quote from the Democrats' report, then when caught, denied saying anything about any report. Pesky details are too inconvenient for his diatribe.
NOOOOO!! Don't ask that retard to do math!F-16A/B Fighting Falcon Fighter
In designing the F-16, advanced aerospace science and proven reliable systems from other aircraft such as the F-15 and F-111 were selected. These were combined to simplify the airplane and reduce itswww.navy.mil
In an air-to-surface role, the F-16 can fly more than 500 miles (860 kilometers), deliver its weapons with superior accuracy, defend itself against enemy aircraft, and return to its starting point.
Benghazi was 1,000 miles away. Do the math.
He's worse at math than he is at reading comprehension.
https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...npopular-and-hated-right.895659/post-27092665
All he proves is that he calls other people idiots and morons, and then shows he knows much less than they do.You really are a moron. WOW
If I hit 40 home runs one season and 15 the next, what is my % of decline in home runs? It is 167%!
You are an idiot.
On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”
“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”
“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal
Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner
A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...www.washingtonexaminer.com
The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.
I never blamed Clinton your fat fuck suffering OCD idiot. My point was that security was lacking.
You dumb witch. I heard it firsthand from the people who were there. Are you ever not an insane Jew filled loser?Who voted to cut the security budget for overseas missions by 30%? That would be the House Republicans. The Tea Party Republicans were installed in the house in early January and they voted to cut the Security Budget for State Deoartment missions by 1/3.
Despite the cuts, the compound in Benghazi had significant security upgrades in 2011.
Former U.S. envoy Pickering on problems at Benghazi mission
You really should Google information before you pull bullshit out of your ass and post it
What were the Republican rules of which they nominated Justices? The Democrats don’t like the outcome so they want to change the rules. Go back and read what you wrote about the Democrats wanting to “balance” the Court. If it were reversed, you would be losing your shit over what you are proposing.Mitch McConnell and the Republicans have already packed the supreme court with conservative nominees they had no right to make by their own rules.
What Democrats are proposing to do is to re-balance the court the way the founders intended. The supreme court isn’t supposed to be a bullwark against against the will of people. It’s supposed to be a protection for the Constitution.
It’s hard to imagine a protection for the constitution that has people like Clarence Hill and Brett Kavanaugh sitting on the bench.
She is a Canadian she has no SAY in what we do with our Supreme Court.What were the Republican rules of which they nominated Justices? The Democrats don’t like the outcome so they want to change the rules. Go back and read what you wrote about the Democrats wanting to “balance” the Court. If it were reversed, you would be losing your shit over what you are proposing.
It looks like she doesn’t have an understanding either on how our Court is selected.She is a Canadian she has no SAY in what we do with our Supreme Court.
You might be right.Dems want to pack the USSC
They’ve got 14 months before the window closes on them.
WTF is Clarence Hill dingbat?It’s hard to imagine a protection for the constitution that has people like Clarence Hill and Brett Kavanaugh sitting on the bench.
WTF is Clarence Hill dingbat?
