Dems violated election law in Wisconsin

[Delldude]

Use of voting vans for absentee ballots. Dems won in Wi doing just this in 2022.

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election law.
__________________
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another," Vebber said. "This decision does just that. WILL's policy and legal expertise allow us to hold government actors accountable to the rule of law at all levels.”

Judge rules use of vans in absentee voting violates election law

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election

1ft.io

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Use of voting vans for absentee ballots. Dems won in Wi doing just this in 2022.

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election law.
__________________
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another," Vebber said. "This decision does just that. WILL's policy and legal expertise allow us to hold government actors accountable to the rule of law at all levels.”

Judge rules use of vans in absentee voting violates election law

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election

1ft.io

That's a bit "hair on fire", don't you think. Elections are secure. Here is the meat and potatos of the ruling. I smell appeal.

"The decision from the bench said even though state law doesn't explicitly outlaw using a mobile voting van as did Racine in 2022, it doesn't mean it is permitted"

 

[wamose]

Democrats these days seem to think they can make their own laws as they go. Hunter proved that again today. Viva Trump.

 

[Hellokitty]

In-person mail in voting?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That's a bit "hair on fire", don't you think. Elections are secure. Here is the meat and potatos of the ruling. I smell appeal.

"The decision from the bench said even though state law doesn't explicitly outlaw using a mobile voting van as did Racine in 2022, it doesn't mean it is permitted"

If the vans went to only heavy Dem areas this was the correct ruling.

 

[WorldWatcher]

In-person mail in voting?

No.

I assume in-person early voting.

WW

 

[Delldude]

That's a bit "hair on fire", don't you think. Elections are secure. Here is the meat and potatos of the ruling.

Miss this part:

The judge wrote, “No defendant or intervener can point to any statute authorizing the use of mobile van absentee ballot sites; instead, the defendants argue no statute expressly prohibits them. The absence of an expressed prohibition however, does not mean mobile absentee ballot sites comport to procedures specified in the election laws. Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions mobile van absentee ballot sites or anything like them. Such an interpretation was and is contrary to law.”

 

[Independentthinker]

Use of voting vans for absentee ballots. Dems won in Wi doing just this in 2022.

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election law.
__________________
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another," Vebber said. "This decision does just that. WILL's policy and legal expertise allow us to hold government actors accountable to the rule of law at all levels.”

Judge rules use of vans in absentee voting violates election law

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election

1ft.io

But but but but but but but but but, there was no fraud in the 2020 election.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Miss this part:

The judge wrote, “No defendant or intervener can point to any statute authorizing the use of mobile van absentee ballot sites; instead, the defendants argue no statute expressly prohibits them. The absence of an expressed prohibition however, does not mean mobile absentee ballot sites comport to procedures specified in the election laws. Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions mobile van absentee ballot sites or anything like them. Such an interpretation was and is contrary to law.”

Which is different from what I said..how....?
Well, no statute expressly forbids it. Therefore, will be appealed. ^Shrug^.


The inference is that voting in Wisconsin is as a whole, corrupt and unsecure...which is false....no matter what year they are referring to.

 

[Marener]

But but but but but but but but but, there was no fraud in the 2020 election.

This has nothing to do with fraud and everything to do with Republicans wanting to suppress voters.

 

[dudmuck]

Miss this part:

The judge wrote, “No defendant or intervener can point to any statute authorizing the use of mobile van absentee ballot sites; instead, the defendants argue no statute expressly prohibits them. The absence of an expressed prohibition however, does not mean mobile absentee ballot sites comport to procedures specified in the election laws. Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions mobile van absentee ballot sites or anything like them. Such an interpretation was and is contrary to law.”

There is no law allowing me to pee on Tuesday evening, so i broke the law last night.

 

[busybee01]

Use of voting vans for absentee ballots. Dems won in Wi doing just this in 2022.

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election law.
__________________
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another," Vebber said. "This decision does just that. WILL's policy and legal expertise allow us to hold government actors accountable to the rule of law at all levels.”

Judge rules use of vans in absentee voting violates election law

(The Center Square) – A state judge has sided with a registered Wisconsin voter, saying use of vans for in-person absentee voting in 2022 was not fair and violated election

1ft.io

This r4uling is pure BS. If it is not prohibited then it is not illegal. If the legislature doesn't like it then it can explicitly ban it.

 

[Independentthinker]

This has nothing to do with fraud and everything to do with Republicans wanting to suppress voters.

LOL. Dems were violating the law to get more votes.

 

[ColonelAngus]

In-person mail in voting?

You take your ballot and mail yourself to the local ballot collection center. Just put a bunch of stamps on the forehead.

Dems are ridiculous

 

[Marener]

LOL. Dems were violating the law to get more votes.

I know. People voting scares you.

 

[Delldude]

Well, no statute expressly forbids it.

It isn't in the elections procedures rules.To make it 'legal', they would need to amend them.

Nothing in the statutory language detailing the procedures by which absentee ballots may be cast mentions mobile van absentee ballot sites or anything like them. Such an interpretation was and is contrary to law.”

If it is not prohibited then it is not illegal.

Not in the elections procedures.

Such an interpretation was and is contrary to law.”