Democrats Vote against not only the Save Act but also strict Photo ID ONLY

[Alicia J]

What a whiny little ****.

**** you, simp.

Get off your fat ass and go get the free ID if you are one of the tiny portion of the populace who doesn't have one.

Why? I already registered to vote, imbecile. If the state or the Federal government wants me to have a voter ID, then they can mail it to me.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say you will be able to vote with zero effort, Dumbass. It does say it's for US citizens only, so insuring only US citizens vote is adhering to the Constitution.

Registering to vote isn't zero effort, imbecile. I already did it. Now tell your cheating Republican dickhead politicians to mail me my voter ID.

 

[Alicia J]

Gore lost every recount. And the Constitution of Florida was the reason for the deadline. IT'S ******* IN THERE, STUPID!

A full statewide hand recount was never completed. That is a fact.

The FL Supreme Court ordered a statewide hand recount. The Republican U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it be stopped before it was completed.

 

[Nostra]

**** you, simp.


Why? I already registered to vote, imbecile. If the state or the Federal government wants me to have a voter ID, then they can mail it to me.


Registering to vote isn't zero effort, imbecile. I already did it. Now tell your cheating Republican dickhead politicians to mail me my voter ID.

Cool. Keep your fat ass on the couch. We need less morons voting.

 

[Alicia J]

Cool. Keep your fat ass on the couch. We need less morons voting.

I'll be voting. Because your cheating bullshit ain't going to pass Congress, simpleton.

 

[StrongAF_2026]

No, they didn't. Republicans don't want certain types of voter IDs to count, such as college IDs. They want to discriminate against groups that mostly vote for Democrats. That has always been the case.

The easiest solution is for the Federal government or the states to mail standard voter IDs to every registered voter, instead of making people go somewhere to get it. But Republicans will not support that.

Criminal illegal aliens can get college ID's so that would be a big fiat no.
Democrats don't want photo ID because they want to and do cheat. Pure and simple.

 

[jacksonlamb]

What a whiny little ****.

Get off your fat ass and go get the free ID if you are one of the tiny portion of the populace who doesn't have one.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say you will be able to vote with zero effort, Dumbass. It does say it's for US citizens only, so insuring only US citizens vote is adhering to the Constitution.

Once again that pesky Constitution destroys the long ago debunked Islamocrat talking point on this.

Yell all you want. November is comings. The Constitution is for all who are subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Tough.

 

[pknopp]

Lies.

To obtain a West Virginia voter ID, follow these steps:

1. Visit your local county clerk's office to request a voter ID.

Lies. You have to fill out an application that then get sent to the Capital and is never going to get back to you in three days.

I'm the reason they changed it to that but still not good enough for the reasons I noted.

 

[Auld Phart]

Yell all you want. November is comings. The Constitution is for all who are subject to the jurisdiction of the US. Tough.

voting is supposedly limited to citizens.

 

[skews13]

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/119th-congress/senate-amendment/4732/text

It seems pretty clear to me that Democrats know they cannot win an election fairly.
They don't want photo ID because they KNOW they have illegals or dead people or both voting.
All this nonsense about the proof of citizenship "disenfranchising voters" in the SAVE act is just gaslighting.
They don't want ANY strict Photo ID to vote because they want to cheat.
By the way, Kamala Harris did not win one state that required strict photo id. Hmm...wonder why that is...

I say everybody should only be able to vote the way Trump did.

 

[pknopp]

A full statewide hand recount was never completed. That is a fact.

The FL Supreme Court ordered a statewide hand recount. The Republican U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it be stopped before it was completed.

Gore lost Florida.

 

[Nostra]

Lies. You have to fill out an application that then get sent to the Capital and is never going to get back to you in three days.

I'm the reason they changed it to that but still not good enough for the reasons I noted.

You are a lying sack pknopp

State of West VirginiaPhoto Voter ID Card Application

If you are a registered voter in West Virginia and have a hard time getting a photo ID to use at the pollsduring early voting or Election Day, you can get a free West Virginia Photo Voter ID Card. To get one, you must complete this form and submit it in person at your County Clerk's office or to someone from the WestVirginia Secretary of State's Office

.You can use any of the IDs below to vote. If you already have one, you do not need to get a West VirginiaPhoto Voter ID Card.• West Virginia driver's license or state-issued ID
• Driver's license from another state
• U.S. passport or passport card
• Employee ID with photo issued by local, state, or federal government• Student ID with photo from a WV institution of higher education or a WV high school
• An ID issued by the OMV without a photo for voters who swear and affirm that they belong torecognized religious communities that prohibit them from being photographedOf the IDs listed above, if you are 65 years of age or older and the ID is expired, it is still acceptable if thedocument was not expired on your 65th birthday.

https://www.harrisoncountywv.gov/includes/countyclerk/Election/Voter%20Photo%20ID%20Application.pdf

 

[pknopp]

You are a lying sack pknopp

State of West VirginiaPhoto Voter ID Card Application

If you are a registered voter in West Virginia and have a hard time getting a photo ID to use at the pollsduring early voting or Election Day, you can get a free West Virginia Photo Voter ID Card. To get one, you must complete this form and submit it in person at your County Clerk's office or to someone from the WestVirginia Secretary of State's Office

.You can use any of the IDs below to vote. If you already have one, you do not need to get a West VirginiaPhoto Voter ID Card.• West Virginia driver's license or state-issued ID
• Driver's license from another state
• U.S. passport or passport card
• Employee ID with photo issued by local, state, or federal government• Student ID with photo from a WV institution of higher education or a WV high school
• An ID issued by the OMV without a photo for voters who swear and affirm that they belong torecognized religious communities that prohibit them from being photographedOf the IDs listed above, if you are 65 years of age or older and the ID is expired, it is still acceptable if thedocument was not expired on your 65th birthday.

https://www.harrisoncountywv.gov/includes/countyclerk/Election/Voter%20Photo%20ID%20Application.pdf

Thar's what I said. An application. The ID is never going to get to you in time to verify your provisional ballot.

It has to go to the SoS office in the Capital.

A few weeks ago they said you could get the ID at your county clerks office until I called the Secretary of States office notifying that county clerks are not doing this.

It's still being pursued.

 

[longly]

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/119th-congress/senate-amendment/4732/text

It seems pretty clear to me that Democrats know they cannot win an election fairly.
They don't want photo ID because they KNOW they have illegals or dead people or both voting.
All this nonsense about the proof of citizenship "disenfranchising voters" in the SAVE act is just gaslighting.
They don't want ANY strict Photo ID to vote because they want to cheat.
By the way, Kamala Harris did not win one state that required strict photo id. Hmm...wonder why that is...

​

I find it hard to understand why anyone would be opposed to photo ID. It seems logical that the only reason someone would oppose it is because they want to cheat, so anything that makes elections more secure makes sense. Any polling station that requires identification should require a state‑authorized photo ID. For voters who are unable to obtain a photo ID—such as those who lack transportation or are incapacitated—the state should be required to assist them in each county to ensure they can get their IDs.

Not only that, but polling places should also be monitored by video cameras. And perhaps, like some developing countries do, voters could have their hands stamped with indelible ink after voting, which takes several days to wear off. That would also be a good idea.

It is not only important that elections be free and fair, but that they appear to be free and fair. Elections should be run in such a way that there is no doubt about their legitimacy. “Trust me” is not an option in politics. For the sake of public harmony and unity, there must be no doubt about the legitimacy of an election. Everything possible should be done to ensure it is free and fair, and the government should make every effort to ensure that every eligible voter has a valid form of state‑approved identification. Those who need help obtaining it should receive that help.

 

[pknopp]

​

I find it hard to understand why anyone would be opposed to photo ID. It seems logical that the only reason someone would oppose it is because they want to cheat, so anything that makes elections more secure makes sense. Any polling station that requires identification should require a state‑authorized photo ID. For voters who are unable to obtain a photo ID—such as those who lack transportation or are incapacitated—the state should be required to assist them in each county to ensure they can get their IDs.

But they DO NOT. Theory and reality are diverse issues here.

Not only that, but polling places should also be monitored by video cameras. And perhaps, like some developing countries do, voters could have their hands stamped with indelible ink after voting, which takes several days to wear off. That would also be a good idea.

It is not only important that elections be free and fair, but that they appear to be free and fair. Elections should be run in such a way that there is no doubt about their legitimacy. “Trust me” is not an option in politics. For the sake of public harmony and unity, there must be no doubt about the legitimacy of an election. Everything possible should be done to ensure it is free and fair, and the government should make every effort to ensure that every eligible voter has a valid form of state‑approved identification. Those who need help obtaining it should receive that help.

Just because a poor loser says there was cheating is NOT a reason to address anything.

 

[Alicia J]

Gore lost Florida.

Only because the Supreme Court said the game was over with 2 minutes left in the 4th quarter.

 

[longly]

But they DO NOT. Theory and reality are diverse issues here.




Just because a poor loser says there was cheating is NOT a reason to address anything.

​

The point is that there should be absolutely no doubt about the results of an election. The process should be engineered in such a way that it can be verified that there was no cheating. Dr. Cornish was right when he said, “You’ve got to remember, in politics everybody’s a liar, a cheat, or a thief. You can’t trust anyone.” He was a lawyer and a college professor, so he knew what he was talking about.

What he was stressing was an attitude more than an exact fact. Of course, not everyone is actually a thief or a cheat, but the system should be treated as if they could be. That is the only way to ensure absolute integrity.

 

[pknopp]

Only because the Supreme Court said the game was over with 2 minutes left in the 4th quarter.

It was investigated after the fact by more than one entity and not a one came up with a Gore win.

 

[pknopp]

​

The point is that there should be absolutely no doubt about the results of an election.

And unless you are a discipline of the orange buffoon, you understand there is no doubt.

The process should be engineered in such a way that it can be verified that there was no cheating. Dr. Cornish was right when he said, “You’ve got to remember, in politics everybody’s a liar, a cheat, or a thief. You can’t trust anyone.” He was a lawyer and a college professor, so he knew what he was talking about.

What he was stressing was an attitude more than an exact fact. Of course, not everyone is actually a thief or a cheat, but the system should be treated as if they could be. That is the only way to ensure absolute integrity.

I disagree. Investigation after investigation. Audit after audit. Lawsuit after lawsuit. Next to nothing.

Even the Heritage Foundation found very little.

 

[Alicia J]

It was investigated after the fact by more than one entity and not a one came up with a Gore win.

That is absolutely not true. Some newspapers who counted all the votes after the election said that Gore would have won.

Additionally, Katherine Harris illegally prevented 12,000 people from voting, 40% of them were African Americans. She "mistakenly" said they were ex-felons when they were not. If just half of those 12,000 people had voted, then Gore wins.

 

[pknopp]

That is absolutely not true. Some newspapers who counted all the votes after the election said that Gore would have won.

Additionally, Katherine Harris illegally prevented 12,000 people from voting, 40% of them were African Americans. She "mistakenly" said they were ex-felons when they were not. If just half of those 12,000 people had voted, then Gore wins.

You sound like MAGA. So many poor losers. I wouldn't care but poor losers want to screw things up for everyone.