Democrats lie about Russia collusion for two years now...

[jc456]

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION!

No it didn’t.

Uh yeah-read it again

Just what answer will satisfy your cognitive bias?

Will a passage quoted from the Mueller report showing collusion between Manafort/Gates and Kilimnik satisfy you?

Go for it

"Paul Manafort served on the Trump Campaign, including a period as campaign chairman, from March to August 2016.838 Manafort had connections to Russia through his prior work for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and later through his work for a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine. Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts during the campaign period through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort employee who previously ran Manafort's office in Kiev and who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence.

Manafort instructed Rick Gates, his deputy on the Campaign and a longtime employee,839 to provide Kilimnik with updates on the Trump Campaign-including internal polling data, although Manafort claims not to recall that specific instruction. Manafort expected Kilimnik to share that information with others in Ukraine and with Deripaska. Gates periodically sent such polling data to Kilimnik during the campaign.”

So Popeye, what is Manafort and Gates doing when they're sharing campaign polling data with the Russians?

Sharing campaign data if that’s what it said. what was manafort sentenced for? Hey, I’m not battling this hoax with you. Go arrest the president fk. Ready go

 

[Third Party]

...now they've dropped it.

What the **** happened?

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

Incorrect. Read the report.

Save time-please tell me what you found

 

[LoneLaugher]

...now they've dropped it.

What the **** happened?

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Read the report. There are big words you should look up

You didn't read it.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I ALMOST can't believe it.

Looked at the graph?
Gradual going up for 10 years.
It was pathetic under Obama. Explosive under the con.
Amazing what knees news propaganda can do

Do you honestly believe that Rump has been President for 10 years? Well, I will admit that it just seems like it but no, just 2 1/2 long bumpy years. And the first year of Rumps office belonged strictly to Obama and that is where the greatest gains were shown. You don't want to give Obama credit, fine. But don't expect me to give Rump any free rides.

All the signs of a Recession are there. But in all fairness, we go into some kind of Recession every 7 to 10 years. Take a look at the year and count back 10 years. Guess what, that's the year everyone "Claims" the recession was at it's height. The only difference was, the Baby wasn't given away and the Feds had a bumper to shorten it up. It could have run for a couple of decades and turned into a full blown Depression. Today, the Baby has been given away and there is no way that the Feds can do anything about it except lie to you.

Don't agree-Obama set a negative TONE for the economy-people don't spend then.

The real recession began in 2002 and was reported to Congress by Bush Jr. Now, count 7 years forward from there. Now it's 2009. In 2003, Bush Jr. presented a 733 billion dollar buyout plan and congress laughed him right off capital hill. In 2009, it really hit and hit hard. Obama dusted that plan off and presented a 1.3 trillion dollar buyout plan and it was finally accepted. This shortened the Recession down to only a few years. But it could have been completely prevented in 2003.

The time has passed and we are headed into another recession. The Federal government normally has the extra resources to do a kick in the pants. But since the last Tax Break, they gave away the baby and really don't have any way to come up with the capital to prevent a full on recession. You can plug up your ears with your index fingers, and yell over and over "LaLaLa, I can't Hear You" all you want. Didn't do them any good in 2003.

What the Hell are you talking about? Sounds like mumbo jumbo sour grapes. I'll give you Obama did cash for clunkers-I still don't know anybody that benefited from that

Cash for Clunkers was supposed to be for Environmental Reasons. Turns out, it was the exact opposite because those same cars that would have been on the used car market would have been purchased by the low income people who were driving REAL smoggers. Who benefited from it? People that were going to buy a new car anyway.

And if you can't understand what I am talking about, what else is new. Maybe you are a Rocket Scienientist and this ain't Rocket Science. It's simple Economics 101. (see, I refrained from calling you a blooming idjit)

 

[Third Party]

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

It said that they didn't have enough evidence to charge Rump with Collusion. And as for Conspiracy, they laid out enough that he's post toasties the say he leaves office.

Conspiracy. Collusion is not a chargeable offense. They didn't find ENOUGH ( not none ) evidence to charge for CONSPIRACY.

Get your facts straight.

Enough or none leads to NO charges. Come to think of it, NO charges for anything else. Straight enough for you?

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

...now they've dropped it.

What the **** happened?

The collusion, obstruction and witness tampering charges are still there. Mueller's report, Volume 2, clearly states 10 instances of obstruction.
But a sitting POTUS can't be indicted.

(I can't believe I actually have to explain this, but you're especially dense, so....)

So if Trump does not win in 2020, the current court filings (like in the Southern District of New York and Eastern District of Virginia) can proceed to indict and charge him with those crimes, which he committed according to witnesses who testified.

And if he is not reelected, there are any number of Federal Charges pending. Rump had better hope to die in office or he's going to die in prison.

There's a whole laundry list of court filings, which are processing through the system now: Trump Still Faces More Than a Dozen Investigations

 

[LoneLaugher]

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

Incorrect. Read the report.

Save time-please tell me what you found

Tons of collusion. Read the report. Or, better yet, listen to it for free on podcast. It's clear.

 

[CHAZBUKOWSKI]

a complete piece of human excrement like Donnie Sh1tstain, into the White House, and continues slavish, blind love for him, are scummy piece of sh1t themselves, and not deserving of respect.

Guess what? We are going to re-elect our President in 2020.

Have at it. Double down on that child rape and military hate. Nice that you found a public figure you can relate to regarding those traits

 

[jc456]

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

It said that they didn't have enough evidence to charge Rump with Collusion. And as for Conspiracy, they laid out enough that he's post toasties the say he leaves office.

Conspiracy. Collusion is not a chargeable offense. They didn't find ENOUGH ( not none ) evidence to charge for CONSPIRACY.

Get your facts straight.

They want to litigate with us. Not gonna happen though. They can go try and arrest the president. I’m still waiting on the votes Russia changed. Notice they avoid that. Turdfks

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Did you read?
No meetings but the inferences were clear.
Have you seen "the great hack"?

Are we using inferences or evidence? He said or she said? Real or fake?

We are using the Mueller Report. If you have never read it, you may want to. Yah, I know, reading it, for the most part, is right up there with needing a Root Canal.

Ok- your move copy and paste what you think it says to back you up-anyone else on this board can help you with that

That's been done over and over. OBonewhatever just did. He seems to have the time so I'll let him have the glory. I can tell you have NEVER read the Mueller Report. And I doubt if anyone here wants all over400 pages pasted into here. But volume 2 is just riddled with this information. I suggest you go read it.

No-I watched CNN, MSNBC, and Fox go over the language and nuance, and it boils down to what I said-disagree if you like, but THAT"S what I am going with.

You hear what you want to hear and discount what you don't agree with as "Fake News". You want to form a coherent opinion, read it for yourself. Otherwise you are being told what to say and what to think. You only need to keep about 3 brain cells to stick around, please turn in any extras as they can be recycled by those with zero brain cells.

 

[jc456]

a complete piece of human excrement like Donnie Sh1tstain, into the White House, and continues slavish, blind love for him, are scummy piece of sh1t themselves, and not deserving of respect.

Guess what? We are going to re-elect our President in 2020.

Have at it. Double down on that child rape and military hate. Nice that you found a public figure you can relate to regarding those traits

You voted for slick Willie. Hmmm ironic

 

[Third Party]

No it didn’t.

Uh yeah-read it again

Just what answer will satisfy your cognitive bias?

Will a passage quoted from the Mueller report showing collusion between Manafort/Gates and Kilimnik satisfy you?

Go for it

"Paul Manafort served on the Trump Campaign, including a period as campaign chairman, from March to August 2016.838 Manafort had connections to Russia through his prior work for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and later through his work for a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine. Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts during the campaign period through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort employee who previously ran Manafort's office in Kiev and who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence.

Manafort instructed Rick Gates, his deputy on the Campaign and a longtime employee,839 to provide Kilimnik with updates on the Trump Campaign-including internal polling data, although Manafort claims not to recall that specific instruction. Manafort expected Kilimnik to share that information with others in Ukraine and with Deripaska. Gates periodically sent such polling data to Kilimnik during the campaign.”

So Popeye, what is Manafort and Gates doing when they're sharing campaign polling data with the Russians?

Sharing campaign data if that’s what it said. what was manafort sentenced for? Hey, I’m not battling this hoax with you. Go arrest the president fk. Ready go

OOPs-no arrest warrant-guess he is clean.

 

[jc456]

...now they've dropped it.

What the **** happened?

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Read the report. There are big words you should look up

You didn't read it.

Sure I did. No one was arrested for any thing related to Russia!

 

[jc456]

Uh yeah-read it again

Just what answer will satisfy your cognitive bias?

Will a passage quoted from the Mueller report showing collusion between Manafort/Gates and Kilimnik satisfy you?

Go for it

"Paul Manafort served on the Trump Campaign, including a period as campaign chairman, from March to August 2016.838 Manafort had connections to Russia through his prior work for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and later through his work for a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine. Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts during the campaign period through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort employee who previously ran Manafort's office in Kiev and who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence.

Manafort instructed Rick Gates, his deputy on the Campaign and a longtime employee,839 to provide Kilimnik with updates on the Trump Campaign-including internal polling data, although Manafort claims not to recall that specific instruction. Manafort expected Kilimnik to share that information with others in Ukraine and with Deripaska. Gates periodically sent such polling data to Kilimnik during the campaign.”

So Popeye, what is Manafort and Gates doing when they're sharing campaign polling data with the Russians?

Sharing campaign data if that’s what it said. what was manafort sentenced for? Hey, I’m not battling this hoax with you. Go arrest the president fk. Ready go

OOPs-no arrest warrant-guess he is clean.

No one either

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Just what answer will satisfy your cognitive bias?

Will a passage quoted from the Mueller report showing collusion between Manafort/Gates and Kilimnik satisfy you?

Go for it

"Paul Manafort served on the Trump Campaign, including a period as campaign chairman, from March to August 2016.838 Manafort had connections to Russia through his prior work for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and later through his work for a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine. Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts during the campaign period through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort employee who previously ran Manafort's office in Kiev and who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence.

Manafort instructed Rick Gates, his deputy on the Campaign and a longtime employee,839 to provide Kilimnik with updates on the Trump Campaign-including internal polling data, although Manafort claims not to recall that specific instruction. Manafort expected Kilimnik to share that information with others in Ukraine and with Deripaska. Gates periodically sent such polling data to Kilimnik during the campaign.”

So Popeye, what is Manafort and Gates doing when they're sharing campaign polling data with the Russians?

Don't believe that indicts Trump-which is the ONLY issue I care about. That's like Biden and his son's actions-I don't care.

It's not the only issue about Rump I care about either. There are worse things. But those worse things are probably not illegal. Rumps conspiracy and obstruction is.

Again they DON"T exist. And it is not Rump any more than it is Obammy. Be civil.

Read the Meuller Report in it's entirety and then form an informed decision. And I mean the whole thing. Think of it as a eqivelent of a Government Root Canal except more painful. And after his latest series of episodes that has worked to tear the country even further apart, it's Rump.

 

[Third Party]

...now they've dropped it.

What the **** happened?

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Read the report. There are big words you should look up

You didn't read it.

We all talk about it-I wonder how many here read the whole thing-I started and found it worse than some of the posts here.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Not dropped. There was collusion.

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

It said that they didn't have enough evidence to charge Rump with Collusion. And as for Conspiracy, they laid out enough that he's post toasties the say he leaves office.

Conspiracy. Collusion is not a chargeable offense. They didn't find ENOUGH ( not none ) evidence to charge for CONSPIRACY.

Get your facts straight.

They did find enough. They just can't prosecute. They also found plenty of obstruction as well but, again, cannot prosecute. Read the damned Mueller Report.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Wow, you're pathetic.

It's just an honest observation of what the Mueller report said.

There was collusion. The Trump campaign colluded with Russian agents to inuence the 2016 election. Period.

What did you read? Report said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION! Russian interference, yes, but it could have been either or BOTH parties-they never bothered to find out.

It said that they didn't have enough evidence to charge Rump with Collusion. And as for Conspiracy, they laid out enough that he's post toasties the say he leaves office.

Conspiracy. Collusion is not a chargeable offense. They didn't find ENOUGH ( not none ) evidence to charge for CONSPIRACY.

Get your facts straight.

Enough or none leads to NO charges. Come to think of it, NO charges for anything else. Straight enough for you?

Wow, you can learn.

 

[Third Party]

Are we using inferences or evidence? He said or she said? Real or fake?

We are using the Mueller Report. If you have never read it, you may want to. Yah, I know, reading it, for the most part, is right up there with needing a Root Canal.

Ok- your move copy and paste what you think it says to back you up-anyone else on this board can help you with that

That's been done over and over. OBonewhatever just did. He seems to have the time so I'll let him have the glory. I can tell you have NEVER read the Mueller Report. And I doubt if anyone here wants all over400 pages pasted into here. But volume 2 is just riddled with this information. I suggest you go read it.

No-I watched CNN, MSNBC, and Fox go over the language and nuance, and it boils down to what I said-disagree if you like, but THAT"S what I am going with.

You hear what you want to hear and discount what you don't agree with as "Fake News". You want to form a coherent opinion, read it for yourself. Otherwise you are being told what to say and what to think. You only need to keep about 3 brain cells to stick around, please turn in any extras as they can be recycled by those with zero brain cells.

Shut up with your mocking-I was polite to you. I watched all three-2 liberal and one conservative to get balance-it is the lazy way out, but I feel effective. Overall we are left with no collusion and 2 say conspiracy but can't prove it and one says no harm no foul. There was more evidence to convict OJ.

 

[Third Party]

Go for it

"Paul Manafort served on the Trump Campaign, including a period as campaign chairman, from March to August 2016.838 Manafort had connections to Russia through his prior work for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and later through his work for a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine. Manafort stayed in touch with these contacts during the campaign period through Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort employee who previously ran Manafort's office in Kiev and who the FBI assesses to have ties to Russian intelligence.

Manafort instructed Rick Gates, his deputy on the Campaign and a longtime employee,839 to provide Kilimnik with updates on the Trump Campaign-including internal polling data, although Manafort claims not to recall that specific instruction. Manafort expected Kilimnik to share that information with others in Ukraine and with Deripaska. Gates periodically sent such polling data to Kilimnik during the campaign.”

So Popeye, what is Manafort and Gates doing when they're sharing campaign polling data with the Russians?

Don't believe that indicts Trump-which is the ONLY issue I care about. That's like Biden and his son's actions-I don't care.

It's not the only issue about Rump I care about either. There are worse things. But those worse things are probably not illegal. Rumps conspiracy and obstruction is.

Again they DON"T exist. And it is not Rump any more than it is Obammy. Be civil.

Read the Meuller Report in it's entirety and then form an informed decision. And I mean the whole thing. Think of it as a eqivelent of a Government Root Canal except more painful. And after his latest series of episodes that has worked to tear the country even further apart, it's Rump.

No, and you won't get off the rump thing huh? He is YOUR PRESIDENT!