Why Republicans (RINO's) hate Thomas Massie

[pknopp]

Such as? Give us a few bills that Massie has put forth that are common sense, and that the rest of the GOP would support and are being blocked?

Just saying that doesn't mean it's so...

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/139

Now granted it isn't something that Republican's would support despite running on it.

 

[j-mac]

pknopp

What's so funny? Nothing to input? It was an honest question, why is that funny?

 

[leftwinger]

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/139

Now granted it isn't something that Republican's would support despite running on it.

That bill was Andy Biggs of AZ. Not your troublemaker, massiedestruction.

 

[j-mac]

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/139

Now granted it isn't something that Republican's would support despite running on it.

That says Andy Biggs introduced the bill...Is Andy Biggs actually Thomas Massie?

 

[pknopp]

https://legiscan.com/US/people/thomas-massie/id/14026?page=2&record=all&type=resolution&status=introduced

 

[dblack]

Republicans hate Massie because he questions Trump. And Trump can't handle that. So they go to bat for Mr. Thin Skin and pretend that Massie is "evil", or worse - secretly a Democrat!

We're basically talking to a bunch of grade school kids.

 

[leftwinger]

https://legiscan.com/US/people/thomas-massie/id/14026?page=2&record=all&type=resolution&status=introduced

Get off the boards dopey. If yo can't learn to cut/paste you are just noise. No one is willingly clicking dirty Stain links at risk of virus or pay wall BS.

 

[j-mac]

https://legiscan.com/US/people/thomas-massie/id/14026?page=2&record=all&type=resolution&status=introduced

Yes, he's very prolific in introducing resolutions, expressing his disagreement over the years....Now, I am going to make this easy on you....

WHAT BILLS FOR LAW, THAT THE GOP WOULD AGREE WITH, HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED BY MASSIE, AND TABLED BY JOHNSON?

You're throwing up alot of nonsense to confuse the original claim...Now, answer the simple question.

 

[pknopp]

Yes, he's very prolific in introducing resolutions, expressing his disagreement over the years....Now, I am going to make this easy on you....

WHAT BILLS FOR LAW, THAT THE GOP WOULD AGREE WITH, HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED BY MASSIE, AND TABLED BY JOHNSON?

You're throwing up alot of nonsense to confuse the original claim...Now, answer the simple question.

"That the GOP would agree with".

This is why I chuckle. They used to pretend to support a balanced budget.

That is why I support Massie but not the GOP.

 

[j-mac]

I am going to help out pknopp for a second....

Here are a couple of bills I found introduced by Massie that Mike Johnson hasn't brought up for a vote yet....

• H.R.7678: Prohibits federal funding of state firearm ownership databases.

Ok, on it's face, I can agree with that...Now, is this, at this moment a priority with all that is going on?

• H.R.7601: No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.

A bill to restrict the use of Elemental Phosphorus in herbicides....Ok....don't know why this would be blocked? Or even if it is....

• H.R.7024: Hemp Planting Predictability Act.

Ok, Wow, super important today....

H.Con.Res.68: Directs the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.

Well now here we go....Certainly all of the GOP agree with this?

Give me a break...

 

[j-mac]

"That the GOP would agree with".

This is why I chuckle. They used to pretend to support a balanced budget.

That is why I support Massie but not the GOP.

Nah,

I've never heard of your undying support for the Rand Paul groupie....The only reason you support him now is that he is being a thorn in Trump's side...Be honest.

 

[wist43]

But the loyalist on both sides just don't care. Even when their side does the same exact thing as they opposed the other side for doing.

I don't equate "the two sides" as being equal, despite the fact that "the two sides" do essentially conspire to maintain the status quo.

------------

There is no patriotism or decency whatsoever in the Democrat Party.

The worst of them are hate-filled, America-hating, criminal opportunists of the most vile sort.

The best of them are simply garden variety political opportunists who are only in office to profit themselves. For this group, even if they might care to do the right thing occasionally, their wholly corrupt leadership would punish and ostracize them - thus ending their career.

Witness Tulsi Gabbard.

---------------

The Republicans on the other hand have a block of representatives that love America and want to restore the rule of law.

They are a minority within the Republican Party, and have to constantly do battle with their corrupt leadership.

---------------------

The leadership of both parties are beholden to, and completely controlled by the Establishment Elites.

Leadership in the Democrat Party has the much easier task of keeping order on their side of the aisle; afterall, bribes, perks, campaign funds, insider trading, etc, are all they need to keep the camp on point.

The Republican leadership has it much more difficult trying to keep patriotic, independent thinkers in line.

The Establishment tries to put "conservative, patriotic" lipstick on the pig, i.e. fraudsters like Mike Johnson or Paul Ryan, but those frauds are nothing more than wolves in sheep's clothing.

 

[pknopp]

Nah,

I've never heard of your undying support for the Rand Paul groupie....The only reason you support him now is that he is being a thorn in Trump's side...Be honest.

Undying? I'm not a part of a cult that pledges undying love.

 

[OldFlame]

Exactly what we did with Iran in 1953.

We put islamists in charge?

 

[OldFlame]

Oh look. . . another straw-man . . . .

No, I'm playing your game and coming to my conclusions based off the evidence I see and believe based on what you post in here. Everything points to you either being an islamist yourself, or a Jew/Israel hater, and that's based on how you blame everything that happens in this country that you don't agree with on Israel and Netanyahu.

 

[MisterBeale]

No, I'm playing your game and coming to my conclusions based off the evidence I see and believe based on what you post in here. Everything points to you either being an islamist yourself, or a Jew/Israel hater, and that's based on how you blame everything that happens in this country that you don't agree with on Israel and Netanyahu.

 

[OldFlame]

View attachment 1228289

So was the post (yours) I responded to a political argument? Or are you a hypocrit?

 

[pknopp]

We put islamists in charge?

We ran off the secular government that lead to the one there now.

Again, Iran in 1953 had a secular government.

 

[OldFlame]

We ran off the secular government that lead to the one there now.

Again, Iran in 1953 had a secular government.

You didn't answer my question.

 

[pknopp]

You didn't answer my question.

Yes, our actions is what put their current leaders in charge.