Democrats Declare Trump Exercising Right Of Free Speech Is 'Intimidation'

[Mac1958]

Trump's behaviors aren't about politics. They're about a man who behaves like a petulant child.

His behavior is actually quite impressive ...

"Impressive". Well, okay, maybe from your perspective.

Maybe he should have marched over to where this lady was testifying, jumped on the table, pulled down his pants, taken a big crap on her notes, wiped his butt with the sleeve of her blouse, and peed on her head, before jumping down off the table and walking back to the White House.

That would have been so cool! He's been so mistreated, that would really have shown them!

That's how you fight back! Punch back harder!
.

unfair suggesting a visual of Trumps fat old ass.

But that would have been so cool, dude!


.

 

[debbiedowner]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

You have a problem when same of the Fox news personalities are attorneys and believe it was intimidation.

 

[debbiedowner]

Meh. It doesn't matter at this point.

Standards & expectations of this man's behavior are so low now that we can just move on.

And what about the behavior of the God Damned Democrats in all of this??????

Standard, stupid, transparent partisan politics.

Trump's behaviors aren't about politics. They're about a man who behaves like a petulant child.
.

And Democrats are committing felony fraud.
Which is worse?

Why does it matter which is worse? Other than to change the subject and enable his behaviors?

Look, you don't have to hold your tribe accountable. I get it.
.

They're scared their fearless leader may be removed or not re elected. They're grasping for straws.

 

[mudwhistle]

Meh. It doesn't matter at this point.

Standards & expectations of this man's behavior are so low now that we can just move on.

And what about the behavior of the God Damned Democrats in all of this??????

Standard, stupid, transparent partisan politics.

Trump's behaviors aren't about politics. They're about a man who behaves like a petulant child.
.

And Democrats are committing felony fraud.
Which is worse?

Why does it matter which is worse? Other than to change the subject and enable his behaviors?

Look, you don't have to hold your tribe accountable. I get it.
.

Boring......

 

[Wry Catcher]

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

Bwuhahahahaha.....WEAK!

Even YOU are smart enough to realize what the Democrats are doing is akin to calling someone ... a 'racist'...for example. The FALSE charge is meant to try to SILENCE people....and what Trump is reminding / informing people of about Yovanovitch is a THREAT to her and Schiff's whole treasonous coup attempt. It exposes her for being one of the few in 2016 who actually engaged in Illegal Collusion....to help HILLARY!

Racists can be covert, or overt - you are a racist as your posts prove. Thus your racism is overt. Covert racists are circumspect and use codes.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The first three witnesses are Obama era holdovers...the first two were mad because the president of the United States went over their heads and this one today Yovanovitch is angry because she was fired...WTF????? dems don't you get it?...this is the swamp fighting back at being drained...but if Trump doesn't drain the swamp then people like Hunter Biden will continue to make their daddy's rich.....with BS do nothing jobs and investments...the swamp is fighting to remain corrupt...they don't want to give up the perks.....

A lie by omission ^^^, Mr Kent was employed by five prior Presidents, three Republicans and two Democrats.
(As was Ambassador Yovanovitch).

Lying by trump supporters is ubiquitous within their rhetoric, along with hypocrisy and character assassinations.

Examples are posted above (post # 15) by Rambunctious and Brokeloser (post # 17).

So? Who gives a fuck? So if a company gets a new CEO he's not allowed to fire any of the long time employees of the company he's in charge of because they've been there a long time?

 

[BlindBoo]

Just shows the absence of character in the man.

Sad. So Sad!

 

[Siete]

The first three witnesses are Obama era holdovers...the first two were mad because the president of the United States went over their heads and this one today Yovanovitch is angry because she was fired...WTF????? dems don't you get it?...this is the swamp fighting back at being drained...but if Trump doesn't drain the swamp then people like Hunter Biden will continue to make their daddy's rich.....with BS do nothing jobs and investments...the swamp is fighting to remain corrupt...they don't want to give up the perks.....

A lie by omission ^^^, Mr Kent was employed by five prior Presidents, three Republicans and two Democrats.
(As was Ambassador Yovanovitch).

Lying by trump supporters is ubiquitous within their rhetoric, along with hypocrisy and character assassinations.

Examples are posted above (post # 15) by Rambunctious and Brokeloser (post # 17).

So? Who gives a fuck? So if a company gets a new CEO he's not allowed to fire any of the long time employees of the company he's in charge of because they've been there a long time?

The White House has also pressured witnesses who agreed to speak with investigators to limit their testimony.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[g5000]

Trump says he is not watching the hearings, and then live tweets about them while they are happening.
\

 

[mudwhistle]

The first three witnesses are Obama era holdovers...the first two were mad because the president of the United States went over their heads and this one today Yovanovitch is angry because she was fired...WTF????? dems don't you get it?...this is the swamp fighting back at being drained...but if Trump doesn't drain the swamp then people like Hunter Biden will continue to make their daddy's rich.....with BS do nothing jobs and investments...the swamp is fighting to remain corrupt...they don't want to give up the perks.....

A lie by omission ^^^, Mr Kent was employed by five prior Presidents, three Republicans and two Democrats.
(As was Ambassador Yovanovitch).

Lying by trump supporters is ubiquitous within their rhetoric, along with hypocrisy and character assassinations.

Examples are posted above (post # 15) by Rambunctious and Brokeloser (post # 17).

So? Who gives a fuck? So if a company gets a new CEO he's not allowed to fire any of the long time employees of the company he's in charge of because they've been there a long time?

Nope.
Presidents have to answer to their underlings......especially if they're Democrats.....and female.
Democrats are the boss in all situations.

 

[ABikerSailor]

While I do believe in free speech, I also do know that sometimes your free speech can be limited while you are in government service.

If you are in the military, prior to attending rallies of any type, you have to check with the Public Affairs Officer to see if it is something that the military is authorized to attend.

You also can't wear your uniform at rallies for a specific candidate.

 

[bripat9643]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

And, BTW, trump's tweets are mostly intimidation, no one objects to his tweets, in fact they have been one of the main reasons for a charge of obstruction of justice - trump is his own worst enemy.

Yes they have. It's called the McCain-Feingold bill.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

And, BTW, trump's tweets are mostly intimidation, no one objects to his tweets, in fact they have been one of the main reasons for a charge of obstruction of justice - trump is his own worst enemy.

Yes they have. It's called the McCain-Feingold bill.

Wait a minute....................are you saying that campaign finance reform is equal to repealing and replacing the 1st Amendment? Explain yourself please.

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA, McCain–Feingold Act, Pub.L. 107–155, 116 Stat. 81, enacted March 27, 2002, H.R. 2356) is a United States federal law that amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which regulates the financing of political campaigns. Its chief sponsors were Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI) and John McCain (R-AZ). The law became effective on 6 November 2002, and the new legal limits became effective on January 1, 2003.[1]

As noted in McConnell v. FEC, a United States Supreme Court ruling on the BCRA, the Act was designed to address two issues:

• The increased role of soft money in campaign financing, by prohibiting national political party committees from raising or spending any funds not subject to federal limits, even for state and local races or issue discussion;
• The proliferation of issue advocacy ads, by defining as "electioneering communications" broadcast ads that name a federal candidate within 30 days of a primary or caucus or 60 days of a general election, and prohibiting any such ad paid for by a corporation (including non-profit issue organizations such as Right to Life or the Environmental Defense Fund) or paid for by an unincorporated entity using any corporate or union general treasury funds. The decision in Citizens United v. FEC overturns this provision, but not the ban on foreign corporations or foreign nationals in decisions regarding political spending.[2]

Although the legislation is known as "McCain–Feingold", the Senate version is not the bill that became law. Instead, the companion legislation, H.R. 2356—introduced by Rep. Chris Shays (R-CT), is the version that became law. Shays–Meehan was originally introduced as H.R. 380.[3]

 

[bripat9643]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

And, BTW, trump's tweets are mostly intimidation, no one objects to his tweets, in fact they have been one of the main reasons for a charge of obstruction of justice - trump is his own worst enemy.

Yes they have. It's called the McCain-Feingold bill.

Wait a minute....................are you saying that campaign finance reform is equal to repealing and replacing the 1st Amendment? Explain yourself please.

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA, McCain–Feingold Act, Pub.L. 107–155, 116 Stat. 81, enacted March 27, 2002, H.R. 2356) is a United States federal law that amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which regulates the financing of political campaigns. Its chief sponsors were Senators Russ Feingold (D-WI) and John McCain (R-AZ). The law became effective on 6 November 2002, and the new legal limits became effective on January 1, 2003.[1]

As noted in McConnell v. FEC, a United States Supreme Court ruling on the BCRA, the Act was designed to address two issues:

• The increased role of soft money in campaign financing, by prohibiting national political party committees from raising or spending any funds not subject to federal limits, even for state and local races or issue discussion;
• The proliferation of issue advocacy ads, by defining as "electioneering communications" broadcast ads that name a federal candidate within 30 days of a primary or caucus or 60 days of a general election, and prohibiting any such ad paid for by a corporation (including non-profit issue organizations such as Right to Life or the Environmental Defense Fund) or paid for by an unincorporated entity using any corporate or union general treasury funds. The decision in Citizens United v. FEC overturns this provision, but not the ban on foreign corporations or foreign nationals in decisions regarding political spending.[2]

Although the legislation is known as "McCain–Feingold", the Senate version is not the bill that became law. Instead, the companion legislation, H.R. 2356—introduced by Rep. Chris Shays (R-CT), is the version that became law. Shays–Meehan was originally introduced as H.R. 380.[3]

McCain-Feingold explicitly prevented anyone from commenting on the election or any of the candidates after a 60 days prior to the election. That's a repeal of the First Amendment. You even quoted the clause that says so. "Issue advocacy" is speech.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dem's pulled politics into the gutter and its Trump's fault he does battle on their terms?

You can't equate anyone's behavior to Trump's. He is absolutely unique in the modern history of American politics.

Hey, I get it. You relate to him. His behavior is cool to you. You probably behave just like him.

Fine with me.
.

Oh please how many times has the Speaker of the House rushed to the cameras and insulted the President of the United States? Called him a criminal? Where is your faux rage over that hmmm.

So you really do equate his behaviors with that of others? You don't see any clear differences?

Serious question. I'll believe your answer.
.

^^^ king of double standards and hypocrisy alert.

Were you going to answer my question?
.

Its a waste of time even attempting to discuss a topic with you.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The first three witnesses are Obama era holdovers...the first two were mad because the president of the United States went over their heads and this one today Yovanovitch is angry because she was fired...WTF????? dems don't you get it?...this is the swamp fighting back at being drained...but if Trump doesn't drain the swamp then people like Hunter Biden will continue to make their daddy's rich.....with BS do nothing jobs and investments...the swamp is fighting to remain corrupt...they don't want to give up the perks.....

A lie by omission ^^^, Mr Kent was employed by five prior Presidents, three Republicans and two Democrats.
(As was Ambassador Yovanovitch).

Lying by trump supporters is ubiquitous within their rhetoric, along with hypocrisy and character assassinations.

Examples are posted above (post # 15) by Rambunctious and Brokeloser (post # 17).

So? Who gives a fuck? So if a company gets a new CEO he's not allowed to fire any of the long time employees of the company he's in charge of because they've been there a long time?

What does that have to do with turmp's effort to bribe the president of Ukraine?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

And, BTW, trump's tweets are mostly intimidation, no one objects to his tweets, in fact they have been one of the main reasons for a charge of obstruction of justice - trump is his own worst enemy.

Yes they have. It's called the McCain-Feingold bill.

McCain was a Republican you silly bird brain.

 

[bripat9643]

Both former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, who illegally worked with corrupt former Ukraine officials to interfere in the 2016 election - and who attempted to play the 'Victim' card during her testimony by claiming she was mistreated and fired 'unjustly', and lying, leaking Coup 2.0 Ringmaster Schiff accused President Trump of 'Attempting to Intimidate' witnesses by exercising his Constitutional Right of Free Speech.

1st, anyone who has been watching his Schiff-led coup attempt knows the whole thing is a sham. If they didn't before they do now, as Democrats have made it clear for everyone to see they have no crime, no evidence, no whistleblower, and no witnesses...because no one who has testified witnessed anything.


2nd, Yovanovitch should be happy she is not in GITMPO, soon to be joined by other Dems (hopefully, after the US IG's report on FISA Court Abuses and other potential crimes comes out). The Ukraine govt has already ruled that what former corrupt Ukraine officials did in working with Yovanovitch and other Democrats to help Hillary in the 2016 election was a CRIME. The Obama administration and Democrats have refused to even look at the Americans involved ,their crimes exposed, and have failed to prosecute the real criminals - their own.

-- Yovanovitch to face GOP grilling on second day of public impeachment hearings


3rd, Although the President, Donald Trump does not forfeit his Constitutional Rights afforded to him, even whole holding the office of President....which he gets to do the one thing that perhaps pisses lying / treasonous Democrats who hate 'light' being shined on them - TWEET...and, usually, for the Democrats, at the worst possible time for the Democrats....like now.

It's not the fact that the President is Tweeting about Yovanovitch DURNIG her despicable testimony that has her, Schiff, and Democrats foaming at the mouth and accusing him of 'Intimidation' - It's WHAT he is tweeting.

Schiff has already declared he would protect the Bidens and would protect all of the Conspirators who in 2016 illegally colluded with corrupt Ukrainians to interfere in the election and help Hillary, that he would not allow such testimony or any questions down that path...and he has tried.

So, what is an American citizen falsely accused by proven lying / treasonous Democrats to do? TWEET!




If Schiff would not allow all the facts (pt #2, link) come out during the inquisition, being broadcast on live TV, then he would just remind everyone of the information / facts / story THAT IS ALREADY OUT FOR EVERYONE TO SEE ./ READ.


Leave it to Democrats / snowflakes to be offended and intimidated by the TRUTH and the substantiating facts that continue to prove they are lying, co-conspiring, treasonous filth gladly willing to do the job of dividing and destroying this nation for our enemies, like the Chinese, Russians, and Iranians - JUST AS LONG AS IT BENEFITS THEM / HELPS THEM GET THEIR POWER TO RULE BACK!


.

So sorry bozo, The Democrats in Congress have never written a bill to repeal and replace the First Amendment.

And, BTW, trump's tweets are mostly intimidation, no one objects to his tweets, in fact they have been one of the main reasons for a charge of obstruction of justice - trump is his own worst enemy.

Yes they have. It's called the McCain-Feingold bill.

McCain was a Republican you silly bird brain.

In name only. Only Dims voted for the bill.

 

[Rambunctious]

The first three witnesses are Obama era holdovers...the first two were mad because the president of the United States went over their heads and this one today Yovanovitch is angry because she was fired...WTF????? dems don't you get it?...this is the swamp fighting back at being drained...but if Trump doesn't drain the swamp then people like Hunter Biden will continue to make their daddy's rich.....with BS do nothing jobs and investments...the swamp is fighting to remain corrupt...they don't want to give up the perks.....

A lie by omission ^^^, Mr Kent was employed by five prior Presidents, three Republicans and two Democrats.
(As was Ambassador Yovanovitch).

Lying by trump supporters is ubiquitous within their rhetoric, along with hypocrisy and character assassinations.

Examples are posted above (post # 15) by Rambunctious and Brokeloser (post # 17).

So? Who gives a fuck? So if a company gets a new CEO he's not allowed to fire any of the long time employees of the company he's in charge of because they've been there a long time?

What does that have to do with turmp's effort to bribe the president of Ukraine?

He didn't try to bribe anyone....if that phone call shows you a bribe then what do you call millions of dollars in cash and gold loaded on a jet in the middle of the night and sent to Iran?....now that is bribery you freaking lightweight....