MagicMike
Platinum Member
How so?I seriously doubt this trial date will stand. It is blatantly unconstitutional.
Specifics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How so?I seriously doubt this trial date will stand. It is blatantly unconstitutional.
Nah. You will persist in distorting everything for the sake of your ineffectual efforts at propaganda.I shall persist in posting documented data.
I’m the one of the two of us who embraces facts and logic and honesty. You run from all three of those things.You can persist in avoiding it by indulging your irrelevant, nonsensical effusions.
For one thing. The defense was presented almost 13 million documents to the defense. To be ready for trial means a legal analysis of over 66,000 documents per day. Of course this can't be done. The Constitution doesn't mearly provide for counsel but for effective assistance of counsel. The expectation that a legal examination can be effective or competent examining 66,000 documents a day and testing legal theories against them is effective or even competent is absurd.How so?
Specifics.
Sounds like inmate #P01135809's legal team had better get busy doesn't it?For one thing. The defense was presented almost 13 million documents to the defense. To be ready for trial means a legal analysis of over 66,000 documents per day. Of course this can't be done. The Constitution doesn't mearly provide for counsel but for effective assistance of counsel. The expectation that a legal examination can be effective or competent examining 66,000 documents a day and testing legal theories against them is effective or even competent is absurd.
Absolutely correct. And the right to a speedy trial is for the benefit of the accused. It is not a weapon to be used against anyone accused of serious crimes.For one thing. The defense was presented almost 13 million documents to the defense. To be ready for trial means a legal analysis of over 66,000 documents per day. Of course this can't be done. The Constitution doesn't mearly provide for counsel but for effective assistance of counsel. The expectation that a legal examination can be effective or competent examining 66,000 documents a day and testing legal theories against them is effective or even competent is absurd.
Why are you fucktards hell bent on eliminating Conservatives from America?Sounds like inmate #P01135809's legal team had better get busy doesn't it?
It sounds like you are also hostile to a fair trial.Sounds like inmate #P01135809's legal team had better get busy doesn't it?
And absolutely grounds for appeal.Absolutely correct. And the right to a speedy trial is for the benefit of the accused. It is not a weapon to be used against anyone accused of serious crimes.
And don’t think that one of many codefendants demanding a speedy trial needs to impact all the other defendants. The simple and obvious expedient is to sever the trial of the one but let the others have the time required.
It appears that this biased judge isn’t looking for a fair trial. She is apparently seeking a specific outcome. That is absolutely and fundamentally the opposite of her duties.
They want to create the communist workers paradise.Why are you fucktards hell bent on eliminating Conservatives from America?
Yep. Democrats wept when the old Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact fell. They wept when Germany was reunited. They long for the US to be a Communist shithole.They want to create the communist workers paradise.
This is up to the judge.And don’t think that one of many codefendants demanding a speedy trial needs to impact all the other defendants. The simple and obvious expedient is to sever the trial of the one but let the others have the time required.
Yes.It appears that this biased judge isn’t looking for a fair trial. She is apparently seeking a specific outcome.
It looks like it will be.Yep. Democrats wept when the old Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact fell. They wept when Germany was reunited. They long for the US to be a Communist shithole.
Know what that verdict will be? NOT GUILTY, BITCH!This is up to the judge.
Typically not the way RICO cases work.
Yes.
Justice for the American people who deserve to have a jury verdict and all the information presented in court about inmate #P01135809's attempt to steal the 2020 election well BEFORE they cast ballots in the 2024 election.
everything you queefed is wrong, gollumboy.He took bribes to get rid of Shokin, for one. Shokin wasnt corrupt. There isnt a single allegation of corruption against him. Joe lied and said he was corrupt, but the Obama administration LOVED Shokin. Joe never had the authority to withhold funds from Ukraine. He did it all on his own and its going to bite him in the ass.
I doubt you have the first damn clue about how Georgia RICO cases work. “Typically” or otherwise. Lots of things are initially “up to the judge.” Many of those things are then prospective grounds for appeal. Rushing a case to trial on the pretext that it happens to be a “RICO” case is not likely to survive an appeal. The right of the people to a fair trial trumps that kind of thing.This is up to the judge.
Typically not the way RICO cases work.
You’re an obtuse idiot. The American people aren’t stakeholders in a criminal trial. The State is and the accused are. That’s it. Period.Yes.
Justice for the American people who deserve to have a jury verdict
and all the information presented in court about inmate #P01135809's attempt to steal the 2020 election well BEFORE they cast ballots in the 2024 election.
The jury has been picked to find guilty and probably paid too.Know what that verdict will be? NOT GUILTY, BITCH!
Not if the defense is on their game and voi dire the piss out of them.The jury has been picked to find guilty and probably paid too.
Not at all.It sounds like you are also hostile to a fair trial.
That’s a lot of words to deny my accurate claim.Not at all.
But you Trumptard MAGAts need to remember that this whole mess was created SOLELY by inmate #P01135809 himself.....and of course you numbskulls who voted for him.
You KNEW he was incompetent. You didn't care.
You KNEW he was a con man.
You didn't care.
You KNEW he was a criminal. Not "criminal" as in your run of the mill career politician "criminal".....but swindler, mobster, psychotic, malignant narcissist criminal.
You didn't care.
You saw him on a reality TV show one time and you were stupid enough to believe that was really who he was and you thought "gee, I'll bet he'd make a good President."
So enough of your self-loathing victimhood and incessant, snowflake WHINING!
Trump brought this all on himself! He is not the "victim" here. He is not being "persecuted."
He just has to face justice for the first time in his life and just like anybody else he has to do it on the court's schedule.
Not his own.
He is out on bond.he is not in jail