Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct

The courts just reaffirmed, if a commanding officer sent the military in to perform law enforcement duties, it would break the Posse Comitatus Act....with just a couple of clear exceptions.
Do you stutter? You cut and pasted that earlier.
 
I know you clearly have to always defend trumps word salad as "This is what he meant."

You don't get to do that with Kelly.

Just show us Exactly where any of them said trump had given an illegal order.
"What illegal order has Trump given? Huh? Huh? HUH?" They keep asking that question because it's the only tactic they have. It's been answered over and over and over, but they keep asking it.

A President of the United States has threatened to HANG United States elected representatives for reminding the military of what they have been told BY THE MILITARY. The cult doesn't know what to do with this, so they just keep repeating the same dishonest ******* stupid question over and over.

This is a group pathology, the world has seen it before, and now it's beginning to fall apart under the weight of its own ******* stupidity.
 
Last edited:

Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct​

24 Nov 2025 ~~ By Cristina Laila

The Department of War on Monday announced it is considering recalling Democrat Senator Mark Kelly for court-martial proceedings after he urged the military to defy President Trump’s orders.
Without offering any specifics, Senators Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ), along with Democrat Reps. Maggie Goodlander (NH), Jason Crow (CO), Chris Deluzio (PA), and Chrissy Houlahan (PA) repeatedly stated, “You can refuse illegal orders,” or “You must refuse illegal orders,” in a viral video.
President Trump called for the Democrat lawmakers featured in the viral video to be locked up.
The Department of War is now reviewing allegations of misconduct.
Full statement from Department of War:




Commentary:
It appears that former Astronaut, Senator Mark Kelly may be headed for a Courts Martial. Article 32's are being prepared.
He's being charged with the following:
All individuals that military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces. Any violations will be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
It appears that Kelly's political ideology has become more predominate that his Loyalty to Navy, America and to the CIC...
His latest statements give the appearance of "Sedition". Though treason would be better.

Basically he could point out that if he were found guilty of "sedition" then all people who take the military oath will also be done for sedition. As they have to say they'll uphold the Constitution.
 
When was the last time someone was courts martialed under civilian law?

It is not applicable. You continue to prove you have no idea what you are yapping about.
When was the last time federal law didn’t apply. Sorry, “Admiral’, you’re slow and uninformed.
 
When was the last time federal law didn’t apply. Sorry, “Admiral’, you’re slow and uninformed.
Federal law does not apply to military personnel.

You haven't figured out why Kelly was the only one of all of those former military personnel to be investigated? It is because he is the only one in retired status and could be recalled to active duty for prosecution. Missed that little tidbit in all the hubbub, didn't you?

All of the others would have to be prosecuted under civilian law, and that is much harder to get through all of the wickets.
 
"What illegal order has Trump given? Huh? Huh? HUH?" They keep asking that question because it's the only tactic they have. It's been answered over and over and over, but they keep asking it.

A President of the United States has threatened to HANG United States elected representatives for reminding the military of what they have been told BY THE MILITARY. The cult doesn't know what to do with this, so they just keep repeating the same dishonest ******* stupid question over and over.

This is a group pathology, the world has seen it before, and now it's beginning to fall apart under the weight of its own ******* stupidity.

Quote his X post if you can and we will be shown that you lie like a dog on a hot summer day! He threatened no one but incorrectly listed that the punishment for sedition was death.

There is not an honest bone in your body.
 
Federal law does not apply to military personnel.

You haven't figured out why Kelly was the only one of all of those former military personnel to be investigated? It is because he is the only one in retired status and could be recalled to active duty for prosecution. Missed that little tidbit in all the hubbub, didn't you?

All of the others would have to be prosecuted under civilian law, and that is much harder to get through all of the wickets.
You haven’t figured out that not all your leftist heroes are military, either ex or retired. Thus federal law applies. Kelly is not exempt from federal law. That little tidbit leaves you infuriated.
 
Quote his X post if you can and we will be shown that you lie like a dog on a hot summer day! He threatened no one but incorrectly listed that the punishment for sedition was death.

There is not an honest bone in your body.
It ain't Trump's first time alluding to it....

Trump was referring to a phone call Milley took after the Jan. 6 riots to reassure Chinese officials that the United States wasn’t under threat of an attack. Several top Trump appointees were aware of his calls, Milley told Congress later that year.


“This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!” Trump added in his post
 
15th post
It's the commanding officer that must refuse to send their men in.
Amazing that you are the only one, the criminal six included, that has made any indication of what the 'unlawful' orders might be. Put your partisan hat back in the toilet where it belongs and run along. Here's another dog biscuit.
 
It ain't Trump's first time alluding to it....

Trump was referring to a phone call Milley took after the Jan. 6 riots to reassure Chinese officials that the United States wasn’t under threat of an attack. Several top Trump appointees were aware of his calls, Milley told Congress later that year.


“This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!” Trump added in his post
I admire your patience.

:laugh:
 
You haven’t figured out that not all your leftist heroes are military, either ex or retired. Thus federal law applies. Kelly is not exempt from federal law. That little tidbit leaves you infuriated.
The only thing that infuriates me is your continued ignorance. Federal law applies to him as a civilian but military law cannot be applied to any of the other video participants. All but Slotkin, are ex-military but only Kelly was retired. That is why he alone was being investigated, and that is a matter of dispute as to whether that is appropriate.

I despise the fact that these elected members of Congress decided to get out of their lane and try to influence members of the military. However, I also am a firm believer in the rule of law, and there is nothing illegal here to litigate. The Republicans are chasing something they can never catch. It's like Democrats impeaching Trump twice. In the end, did any of that matter? He still got elected again in 2024.
 
Back
Top Bottom