Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct

This s precisely what Kelly has done, as did all those Democrat swine in that video. And this statute applies to anyone, not just military or former miliary.

1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; ...[/indebnt]​
None of which happened because they just reminded the brass of their oath....military code. If they were trying to break their oath of service, and urge defying legal orders you might have something, but not for this....
 
And the next day the terrorist group that was living in that civilian area blows up a series of buildings killing thousands.

So your advice to those soldiers is to tell their command to go **** themselves when ordered to Chicago to protect ICE?

No my advice is for President Trump, the SecDef, and military commanders to follow the law and cease and desist unlawful activity upon court orders.

People think this is about the individual soldier/sailor/marine/airman/spaceman. It’s not. It’s a summed at leadership.

WW
 
None of which happened because they just reminded the brass of their oath....military code. If they were trying to break their oath of service, and urge defying legal orders you might have something, but not for this....
Who is the “they” you are the spokesloon for?
 
None of which happened because they just reminded the brass of their oath....military code. If they were trying to break their oath of service, and urge defying legal orders you might have something, but not for this....


And why was here this sudden need to remind all ranks, not just brass? Hmm.

TDS.
 
Who said it was?
Who defines ‘illegal orders”, little lady?

“All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful,” the department stated. “A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order
 
Why do you swallow the garbage you get from MSNBC?

“All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful,” the department stated. “A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order
They do have a legal obligation to obey lawful orders. Absolutely!!!

They also have a legal obligation to disobey UNLAWFUL orders....which is what they were reminded of by those 6.

Are you saying they are obligated to follow UNLAWFUL orders? What is your beef?
 
You know a trial is dead on arrival when a right-wing outlet admits it. I'll give you an excerpt below. Mind you, the Examiner didnt even cite all the flaws the case has.
This is a Comey-style Trump-revenge failure waiting to happen:


Glad to see Trump found another dog whistle to keep you occupied. LMAO Sit, Ubu, sit. Good dog.
 

Democrat Senator Mark Kelly Faces Court-Martial After Department of War Launches Review of Allegations of Misconduct​

24 Nov 2025 ~~ By Cristina Laila

The Department of War on Monday announced it is considering recalling Democrat Senator Mark Kelly for court-martial proceedings after he urged the military to defy President Trump’s orders.
Without offering any specifics, Senators Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ), along with Democrat Reps. Maggie Goodlander (NH), Jason Crow (CO), Chris Deluzio (PA), and Chrissy Houlahan (PA) repeatedly stated, “You can refuse illegal orders,” or “You must refuse illegal orders,” in a viral video.
President Trump called for the Democrat lawmakers featured in the viral video to be locked up.
The Department of War is now reviewing allegations of misconduct.
Full statement from Department of War:




Commentary:
It appears that former Astronaut, Senator Mark Kelly may be headed for a Courts Martial. Article 32's are being prepared.
He's being charged with the following:
All individuals that military retirees remain subject to the UCMJ for applicable offenses, and federal laws such as 18 U.S.C. § 2387 prohibit actions intended to interfere with the loyalty, morale, or good order and discipline of the armed forces. Any violations will be addressed through appropriate legal channels.
It appears that Kelly's political ideology has become more predominate that his Loyalty to Navy, America and to the CIC...
His latest statements give the appearance of "Sedition". Though treason would be better.

I have bad news. This thread will age better than yours: Washington Examiner (right wing ): Court Martial of Mark Kelly doomed to flop
 
Who defines ‘illegal orders”, little lady?

“All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful,” the department stated. “A servicemember’s personal philosophy does not justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order
Still deflecting, kid. No one told them to disobey orders they don't agree with.
 
You're comfortable with Kelly telling every military member to question every order from their superiors?
The days of Gaby Gifford are long over with.
Nancy Pelosi and her cabal { Debbie Wasserman Schultz }
planted their Liberal/Leftist arses at Giffords hospital
in record time to manipulate { massage } a Democrat
responce.Meaning abuse { smooth-over } facts.
Giffords was a Gun owner who went to the range to
practice.At that time in history ANY Gun owner was treated by
Pelosi and Wasserman-Schultz as if Public Enemy Number one.
That is fact.
Democrats thought they owned Facts.
They have not given up on that Scheme.
They have gotten much Worse and now expect
outright Lies to carry the day.
 
They do have a legal obligation to obey lawful orders. Absolutely!!!

They also have a legal obligation to disobey UNLAWFUL orders....which is what they were reminded of by those 6.

Are you saying they are obligated to follow UNLAWFUL orders? What is your beef?
They do have a legal obligation to obey lawful orders. Absolutely!!!

They also have a legal obligation to disobey UNLAWFUL orders....which is what they were reminded of by those 6.

Are you saying they are obligated to follow UNLAWFUL orders? What is your beef?
As usual , you’re not paying attention.

“….“All servicemembers are reminded that they have a legal obligation under the UCMJ to obey lawful orders and that orders are presumed to be lawful,”
 
You know a trial is dead on arrival when a right-wing outlet admits it. I'll give you an excerpt below. Mind you, the Examiner didnt even cite all the flaws the case has.
This is a Comey-style Trump-revenge failure waiting to happen:


I doubt they will even push it that far.
 
15th post
Still deflecting, kid. No one told them to disobey orders they don't agree with.
Pay attention little lady, any order can be thought to be unlawful by an individual who disagrees with it.
 


Fake or real Stain? Midget in bed with the Soros? Many many communist are with Sorros.
 
Back
Top Bottom