Si modo
Diamond Member
a massively expensive and redundant project that unecessarily antagonized the russians .... what's not to love?
So, Chris - perhaps you can demonstrate how this system is redundant. Thanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
a massively expensive and redundant project that unecessarily antagonized the russians .... what's not to love?
a massively expensive and redundant project that unecessarily antagonized the russians .... what's not to love?
So, Chris - perhaps you can demonstrate how this system is redundant. Thanks.
Sea-based defense has nothing to do with mid-range, thus there is no redundant system. Yet some mention it. I'm open to seeing what this redundant system is that is mentioned.
So, Chris - perhaps you can demonstrate how this system is redundant. Thanks.
Very simple.
One American nuclear submarine could destroy Iran.
Israel could destroy Iran.
Iran knows this, and so do we.
Sea-based defense has nothing to do with mid-range, thus there is no redundant system. Yet some mention it. I'm open to seeing what this redundant system is that is mentioned.So, Chris - perhaps you can demonstrate how this system is redundant. Thanks.
Very simple.
One American nuclear submarine could destroy Iran.
Israel could destroy Iran.
Iran knows this, and so do we.
Your partisan and off topic hyperbole aside, I care as there are alternatives to the barbaric deterrent of MAD.Sea-based defense has nothing to do with mid-range, thus there is no redundant system. Yet some mention it. I'm open to seeing what this redundant system is that is mentioned.Very simple.
One American nuclear submarine could destroy Iran.
Israel could destroy Iran.
Iran knows this, and so do we.
Who cares? We could destroy Iran anytime we want to.
The greatest threat to American security is the Republican Party.
Reagan and Bush almost bankrupted the country by reducing taxes on the rich and borrowing money to pay for ridiculous military adventures.
Your partisan and off topic hyperbole aside, I care as there are alternatives to the barbaric deterrent of MAD.Sea-based defense has nothing to do with mid-range, thus there is no redundant system. Yet some mention it. I'm open to seeing what this redundant system is that is mentioned.
Who cares? We could destroy Iran anytime we want to.
The greatest threat to American security is the Republican Party.
Reagan and Bush almost bankrupted the country by reducing taxes on the rich and borrowing money to pay for ridiculous military adventures.
Not now.Your partisan and off topic hyperbole aside, I care as there are alternatives to the barbaric deterrent of MAD.Who cares? We could destroy Iran anytime we want to.
The greatest threat to American security is the Republican Party.
Reagan and Bush almost bankrupted the country by reducing taxes on the rich and borrowing money to pay for ridiculous military adventures.
MAD??
Ha, ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha!!!!
Iran could not destroy us!
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad raised the stakes against Israel on Friday and called the Holocaust a lie, just as world powers try to decide how to deal with the nuclear ambitions of an Iran in political turmoil.........Iranian president raises stakes against Israel | World | Reuters
Thanks Jimmy Carter for this mess
Way to go, Madeleine. Telling the Russians, who rejected communism for democracy, that democracy is not a perfect system (it's not, but...).Madeleine Albright: "America Has No Intention of Being First Nation of the World" .......Gateway Pundit: Madeleine Albright: "America Has No Intention of Being First Nation of the World"
That's quite a gamble on estimates that have been historically about 50% correct.Assertion #1: The Iranian Ballistic Missile Development Program Is More Focused on Short- and Medium-Range Missiles. Specifically, the fact sheet states: The intelligence community now assesses that the threat from Irans short- and medium-range ballistic missiles is developing more rapidly than previously projected, while the threat of potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities has been slower to develop than previously estimated.[3]
White House Fact Sheet on Missile Defense Raises More Questions Than It Answers
That's quite a gamble on estimates that have been historically about 50% correct.Assertion #1: The Iranian Ballistic Missile Development Program Is More Focused on Short- and Medium-Range Missiles. Specifically, the fact sheet states: The intelligence community now assesses that the threat from Irans short- and medium-range ballistic missiles is developing more rapidly than previously projected, while the threat of potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities has been slower to develop than previously estimated.[3]
White House Fact Sheet on Missile Defense Raises More Questions Than It Answers
I did. But thanks for your input.That's quite a gamble on estimates that have been historically about 50% correct.Assertion #1: The Iranian Ballistic Missile Development Program Is More Focused on Short- and Medium-Range Missiles. Specifically, the fact sheet states: The intelligence community now assesses that the threat from Irans short- and medium-range ballistic missiles is developing more rapidly than previously projected, while the threat of potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities has been slower to develop than previously estimated.[3]
White House Fact Sheet on Missile Defense Raises More Questions Than It Answers
try reading the article
Your 'article' said:....
Leaving aside the fact that intelligence estimates of foreign ballistic missile developments is an inexact science and that the U.S. is often taken by surprise regarding these developments ....
I did. But thanks for your input.That's quite a gamble on estimates that have been historically about 50% correct.
try reading the articleYour 'article' said:....
Leaving aside the fact that intelligence estimates of foreign ballistic missile developments is an inexact science and that the U.S. is often taken by surprise regarding these developments ....
Assertion #1: The Iranian Ballistic Missile Development Program Is More Focused on Short- and Medium-Range Missiles. Specifically, the fact sheet states: ]
iran helping taliban......u.s. Says pakistan, iran helping taliban -- latimes.com