Dem senator reveals the Seditious Six video had a "script", and wasn't the first version

[Rogue AI]

I'm not really understanding the message they were trying to send. What exactly were they referring to? Why didn't they release a video under Biden? Why didn't they release a video two, or three or four or six months ago under Trump? What was different about now that they felt they had to release this video?

They needed a distraction from the complete failure of that Epstein thing.

 

[rightwinger]

A group of Dems telling soldiers and order is unlawful doesn’t make it unlawful

Frankly it looks like sedition

Only they did no such thing

Reciting the law is not sedition

 

[rightwinger]

What unlawful acts?

Eventually, you'll have to answer this question, or run away.

You have it backwards

Kelly is making no criminal charges so is not required to define a criminal act

Trump is making charges of sedition and treason
Burden of proof is on him

 

[struth]

Only they did no such thing

Reciting the law is not sedition

You have no idea what they did in their private convos with military personal that Eric Swalwell admitted they have been engaged in

 

[rightwinger]

You have no idea what they did in their private convos with military personal that Eric Swalwell admitted they have been engaged in

Neither do you Skippy

Members of Congress are allowed to talk to the military

 

[marvin martian]

You have it backwards

Kelly is making no criminal charges so is not required to define a criminal act

Precisely. Kelly has publicly declared that President Trump has issued ZERO illegal orders.

He has much more integrity than you. You're still perpetuating insurrectionist lies.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The most that can be done is Kelly is court marshaled.

.

Maybe.

.

 

[struth]

Neither do you Skippy

Members of Congress are allowed to talk to the military

Nope hence why I am waiting to see what the investugation concludes

 

[Rawley]

Lets call it a stupid stunt that exploded in their faces. This seems to happen to democrats a lot these days

That they involved the military brings it to a whole different level.

 

[Seymour Flops]

They planned to make a video with Congress members who served reminding about UCMJ rules on unlawful orders

Why does it surprise you that they discussed what was to be in it?

It isn't surprising, but that is the kind of thing investigators will ask about.

 

[Rawley]

The only part you are missing is the “criminal” part

Pesky details

(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:
(1)
advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States;

18 U.S. Code § 2387 - Activities affecting armed forces generally

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[marvin martian]

It isn't surprising, but that is the kind of thing investigators will ask about.

Yup. They need to find out who else was involved. Now that this dummy Gallegos has let the cat out of the bag, we know it was a conspiracy.

 

[22lcidw]

Disobeying unlawful commands is good order and not a crime

Can you cite the crime?

The man who was enraged that this daughter was raped at a school restroom due to the crazy sex laws and arguing with the Prog Socialist women on the school board at a meeting that resulted in the police slamming him into the ground is reality. So, we can all say what are unlawful orders? I guarantee you when your Communist utopia gets here, there will be no dissension. The "shadow on the land" exists now, only to degree.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[Seymour Flops]

 

[hjmick]

So what.

 

[marvin martian]

So what.

So, the DOJ is looking into it.

 

[hjmick]

So, the DOJ is looking into it.

Of course they are.

 

[rightwinger]

advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States;

Advising others that Refusing an unlawful order is allowed does not meet that standard

 

[struth]

Advising others that Refusing an unlawful order is allowed does not meet that standard

The issue is there was no unlawful order, they’ve admitted that.