Deep State Intel Commnity At It Again: ICIG Altered Whistle Blower Rule To Make Complaint Possible

[easyt65]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!






Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

 

[BlindBoo]

The myth that the rules were changed was debunked days ago.

Any other talking point you want to re-hash that's already been proven false?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

how many times are you sheep going to post this lie?

this is like the 19th thread on the topic.

Here is the law the form was based off, what the form says is really irrelevant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...CODE-2015-title50-chap44-subchapI-sec3033.pdf

Section K(5) is the part that covers it.

The law is unchanged since January 3, 2016

Read it for yourself instead of relying on someone else.

 

[easyt65]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

how many times are you sheep going to post this lie?

this is like the 19th thread on the topic.

Here is the law the form was based off, what the form says is really irrelevant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...CODE-2015-title50-chap44-subchapI-sec3033.pdf

Section K(5) is the part that covers it.

The law is unchanged since January 3, 2016

Read it for yourself instead of relying on someone else.

You seem to miss the part in that above link where the ICIG ADMIITED to changing the rules to adhere to the designated time frame during which it was his responsibility to investigate the matter and determine credibility before sending any complaint to Congress.

In the above the ICIG stated he made the decision to allow the 2nd-hand account - from an identified politically-biased, 2020 Dem Presidential candidate-supporting CIA agent who had no direct knowledge of the President's phone call to go forward to Congress.

So THAT is what you Trump-haters / snowflakes call 'credible evidence'?

I understand how Trump-hating Democrats and Deep State Intel Operatives can easily find that type of 'evidence' credible, but the rest of the world - especially considering the last 3 years - can not.

AFTER it was sent to Congress and the Democrats weaponized the hearsay / 2nd-hand false accusation, it QUICKLY, without any investigation of the matter by the ICIG - who was responsible for doing so before sending it to Congress, that 1) The Ukraine PM declared what the Democrats claimed happened NEVER HAPPENED, 2) the transcript of the call debunks the Democrats claim, and 3) The existing Mutual Law Enforcement and Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties completely shuts down / destroys the 2nd-hand 'this is what I heard' bullshit submitted by a Trump-hating, politically-biased, Dem-supporting Deep State Trump-hater.

Had the ICIG done his damn job Collusion Delusion 2.0 instead of facilitating the Democrats this manufactured scandal would nave have made it to the House, and we would not be forced to endure another round of butt-hurt Democrat Sedition and Treason.

 

[martybegan]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

how many times are you sheep going to post this lie?

this is like the 19th thread on the topic.

Here is the law the form was based off, what the form says is really irrelevant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...CODE-2015-title50-chap44-subchapI-sec3033.pdf

Section K(5) is the part that covers it.

The law is unchanged since January 3, 2016

Read it for yourself instead of relying on someone else.

Then why change the form?

Then why was the statement on the form in the first place?

 

[easyt65]

"Lost amid the cacophony of condemnation of Trump is the fact that the Criminal Division of the Justice Department examined the official record of the Trump-Zelensky telephone call and concluded there was no crime, not even a violation of campaign finance laws. “All relevant components of the Department agreed with this legal conclusion,” said the Justice Department."

Gregg Jarrett: Trump did NOT commit an impeachable offense on call with Ukraine’s president – Here’s why

 

[Billy_Bob]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

how many times are you sheep going to post this lie?

this is like the 19th thread on the topic.

Here is the law the form was based off, what the form says is really irrelevant.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg...CODE-2015-title50-chap44-subchapI-sec3033.pdf

Section K(5) is the part that covers it.

The law is unchanged since January 3, 2016

Read it for yourself instead of relying on someone else.

You seem to miss the part in that above link where the ICIG ADMIITED to changing the rules to adhere to the designated time frame during which it was his responsibility to investigate the matter and determine credibility before sending any complaint to Congress.

In the above the ICIG stated he made the decision to allow the 2nd-hand account - from an identified politically-biased, 2020 Dem Presidential candidate-supporting CIA agent who had no direct knowledge of the President's phone call to go forward to Congress.

So THAT is what you Trump-haters / snowflakes call 'credible evidence'?

I understand how Trump-hating Democrats and Deep State Intel Operatives can easily find that type of 'evidence' credible, but the rest of the world - especially considering the last 3 years - can not.

The ICIG is now scrambling to cover his ass and keep from having treason charges filed against him... Too Funny!

 

[pyetro]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

RIP, this thread (2019-2019):
Watchdog, experts debunk Trump claim whistleblower rules changed before complaint

 

[Billy_Bob]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

RIP, this thread (2019-2019):
Watchdog, experts debunk Trump claim whistleblower rules changed before complaint

I'll take the ICIG's admission of intentional wrongdoing over your partisan pile of crap. When the ICIG admits to this corruption its time to remove him and the WB complaint as a fabricated coup attempt..

What are you going to use now that your Coup D'tat has now been exposed? What are you going to do now that Schiff and Democrats on his committee have been outed as the manufacturers of the letter they leaked?

Its freaking blowing up in your faces...

 

[easyt65]

RIP, this thread (2019-2019):
Watchdog, experts debunk Trump claim whistleblower rules changed before complaint

Awwwww, how cute. 'Watchdog' / (Trump-hating) 'Experts' debunk TRUMP claim.....

Have they 'debunked' what the ICIG declared?

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General (NOT President Trump) released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019..."

 

[busybee01]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

There is no deep state in our intelligence community. They are working to keep us safe from our enemies. Donald Trump wants to politicize our intelligence agencies so they will tell us what Trump wants to tell us. Trump is the deep state that is trying to destroy our intelligence agencies.

This is a impeachable offense. There is no US investigation of Biden so the treaty does not cover this. Biden has committed no crimes in the US nor Ukraine. I guess you got your latest talking points.

The whistleblower laws were not changed. Only the forms. The IG found the claim credible and we know it is true now.

There is no coup. Only crazy conspiratorial theories. You are a crazy piece of trash who should be in a looney bin somewhere.

 

[busybee01]

"Lost amid the cacophony of condemnation of Trump is the fact that the Criminal Division of the Justice Department examined the official record of the Trump-Zelensky telephone call and concluded there was no crime, not even a violation of campaign finance laws. “All relevant components of the Department agreed with this legal conclusion,” said the Justice Department."

Gregg Jarrett: Trump did NOT commit an impeachable offense on call with Ukraine’s president – Here’s why

You mean the Trump DOJ.

 

[Dragonlady]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

You need to keep up Evgeny. I guess it gets hard to keep up in Russia on the talking points, the President's lies are getting debunked so quickly these days:

Were the Whistleblower Rules Changed? Fact Checking Accusations Made by Trump and His GOP Allies

 

[martybegan]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

There is no deep state in our intelligence community. They are working to keep us safe from our enemies. Donald Trump wants to politicize our intelligence agencies so they will tell us what Trump wants to tell us. Trump is the deep state that is trying to destroy our intelligence agencies.

This is a impeachable offense. There is no US investigation of Biden so the treaty does not cover this. Biden has committed no crimes in the US nor Ukraine. I guess you got your latest talking points.

The whistleblower laws were not changed. Only the forms. The IG found the claim credible and we know it is true now.

There is no coup. Only crazy conspiratorial theories. You are a crazy piece of trash who should be in a looney bin somewhere.

Why were the forms changed?

The current administrative government leans towards Democrats. A dem in office wouldn't face a tenth of the leaks we see now.

The Deep State is real, and prog asshats like you support it because you know you can get what you want THROUGH IT without popular support.

 

[easyt65]

Top Lawmakers Tell Intel Community Inspector General: Come Clean On Secret Changes To Whistleblower Rules


"Lawmakers in both chambers wrote to the Intelligence Community Inspector General on Monday demanding answers about why his office secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblower complaints contain first-hand evidence."


“Based on the language on [the May 24, 2018] form, it appears that the requirement for first-hand information has been an ICIG policy regardless of how a whistleblower makes an urgent concern report,” they wrote. “Curiously the urgent disclosure form that now appears on the Office of the Director of National Intelligence website has recently changed and no longer contains this explicit first-hand information requirement.”

“[T]he timing of the removal of the first-hand information requirement raises questions about potential connections to this whistleblower’s complaint,” the lawmakers continued. “This timing, along with numerous apparent leaks of classified information about the contents of this complaint, also raise questions about potential criminality in the handling of these matters.”
- Top Lawmakers To IC IG: Fess Up About Changes To Whistleblower Rules





Do NOT Question the Great & Powerful,
All-Knowing, All-Seeing Democrats! We
Will Tell You All We Think You Need To
Know!

 

[alang1216]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

How many INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY people have you talked to?

 

[easyt65]

You need to keep up Evgeny. I guess it gets hard to keep up in Russia on the talking points, the President's lies are getting debunked so quickly these days:

So, again, you believe that 2nd-hand information from a proven politically-biased 2020 Dem candidate supporting CIA Agent equates to 'credible evidence' and would ever stand up in any court or legal hearing other than before Trump-Hating Democrats, some f whom have admitted committing crimes in pursuit of removing the President from office?

Bwuhahahaha......

 

[easyt65]

How many INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY people have you talked to?

Your question is irrelevant. Try tp stay focused on the facts / what is important instead of trying to distract...

The WB has been identified as a politically partisan, 2020 Democrat Candidate-supporting CIA Agent who admittedly has zero personal knowledge of what happened / what was said in the phone call between the President and the Ukraine PM.

The WB has admitted that the complaint is based on 2nd-hand account information ('Hearsay' - inadmissible' as evidence in a court of law) and on OTHER politically-biased, Democrat-supporting sources.
- There are no witnesses who have a 1st-hand account of the event - the case is 'BULLSHIT'

The ICIG has a responsibility to investigate the complaint and determine if it was 'credible' or not before sending this to Congress.

1. The above summary of the complaint and the WB does NOT meet the definition of 'credible' by any definition of the word and would be tossed out of any court in the country.

2. The Ukraine PM has declared that the Democrats' & WB's false narrative NEVER HAPPENED. The ICIG obviously did not investigate / talk to the 2nd party in the phone call between 2 leaders.

3. The transcripts debunk the claims.

4. The existence of the Mutual Law Enforcement and Investigative Assistance treaties between the United States and European countries - which is executed by one leader requesting assistance from the other - completely wipes out - DESTROYS - any claim that the President committed a crime.
-- The fact that the President was executing existing Mutual Assistance / Support treaties with foreign nations when talking to Ukraine's PM is fully supported by the Australian Leader having recently come out to proclaim that the President had also called him to request assistance in the investigation of possible crimes committed by US govt officials /employees, adding Australia is already willingly helping the US. The fact the Ukraine PM is not the only leader of a foreign country with whom we have Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the President has called to request assistance in this matter proves the President did not single-out Ukraine to extort.

Unless Democrats can come up with a video-taped confession on which the President brags about having extorted the PM of Ukraine - like the one former VP Biden made - then once again the Democrats have launched ANOTHER coup attempt under the false pretense / accusation of treason without having any evidence of a crime having been committed.

.

 

[Oddball]

"The Intelligence Community Inspector General released a statement admitting the office changed its forms for whistleblowers between May 2018 and August 2019...The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.”

The ICIG makes it clear that the 'Whistle Blower' had / has no 1st-hand account knowledge of the details between President Trump and the Ukraine PM but that the WB wanted to have their complaint rushed to Congress...

The WB wasn't the only one who wanted to rush this non-scandal to Congress and leaked /dispersed out to the media.

They were in such a rush to get the manufactured complaint to Congress to create a NEW 'Impeachable Offense' that they didn't just change the rule just for this 1 case, they also totally ignored the existing Mutual Law Enforcement / Investigative Assistance and Cooperation treaties the United States has with European nations which are initiated by the leader of one nation making a request for assistance to another.

THIS means President Trump did NOT break any law - he was executing an existing treaty by requesting assistance from the Ukraine PM in investigating potential crimes - which the former VP admitted to in his video-taped confession. Oops - was the ICIG's complete failure to remember this small fact a result of his rushing to get this to Congress, or was it an intentional omission? Since we now know the IG for the Deep State Intel Community - that was found to have participated in Obama's failed coup attempt - changed the Whistle Blower rules just for this specific case, it sure seems like it was intentional.

The only way the hearsay / debunked false accusation made it to Congress and this whole Coup Attempt 2.0 became an issue is because THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSPECTOR GENERAL CHANGED THE WHISTLE BLOWER RULE JUST FOR THIS PERSON / THIS CASE TO CREATE THIS SCANDAL!


View attachment 282392



Intelligence Community Inspector General Admits to Secret Rule Change for Whistleblower Reports

Wait a sec...Isn't this also the same IG who said that this complaint wasn't passed along and made public because it wasn't a pressing enough matter?

WTF is going on here?

 

[alang1216]

How many INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY people have you talked to?

Your question is irrelevant. Try tp stay focused on the facts / what is important instead of trying to distract...

The WB has been identified as a politically partisan, 2020 Democrat Candidate-supporting CIA Agent who admittedly has zero personal knowledge of what happened / what was said in the phone call between the President and the Ukraine PM.

The WB has admitted that the complaint is based on 2nd-hand account information ('Hearsay' - inadmissible' as evidence in a court of law) and on OTHER politically-biased, Democrat-supporting sources.
- There are no witnesses who have a 1st-hand account of the event - the case is 'BULLSHIT'

I presume you are admitting that your post is based on 2nd- or 3rd-hand account information ('Hearsay' - inadmissible' as evidence in a court of law). How about OTHER politically-biased, GOP-supporting sources?

There are 10 or so witnesses who have a 1st-hand account of the event. Don't you want to hear from them or are you only content with GOP hearsay?