Biden Bribery Breadcrumbs Leave Only One Possible Conclusion: Deep-State Partisans Buried The Evidence

[meaner gene]

Nope. I'd tell to read the law, but that would be like asking my schnauzer to drive me to Ralphs.

I read the law, and under section 2

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A)being influenced in the performance of any official act;

That requires the direct involvement of Joe Biden in making the payment deal, which there is absolutely no evidence of. So far you have Hunter selling the "illusion of influence: and getting paid for it. But with no evidence Joe was involved, you have nothing.
And not even Comer has shown any proof that Joe was involved.

 

[Rawley]

I read the law, and under section 2

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A)being influenced in the performance of any official act;

That requires the direct involvement of Joe Biden in making the payment deal,

Didn't like the word "indirectly" so you simply ignored it Ratty? Gotta go, my schnauzer is bring the car around.

 

[meaner gene]

Didn't like the word "indirectly" so you simply ignored it Ratty? Gotta go, my schnauzer is bring the car around.

Didn't you read the requirements of a public official. Let me repeat

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

Demands - NOPE
Seeks - NOPE
Receives - NOPE
Accepts - NOPE
Agrees to ...for any other person - NOPE

The only one who sought or accepted was Hunter.

And Hunter was fraud not bribery, since he was selling the "illusion of influence", as Devon Archer testified to congress.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Rawley, you have neither "directly" or "indirectly" evidence of Joe being corrupt.

Keep digging.

 

[meaner gene]

Rawley, you have neither "directly" or "indirectly" evidence of Joe being corrupt.

Keep digging.

Rawley can't have been a very good lawyer, since he thinks you can convict based on pure speculation, and don't require any actual evidence to be presented.

It's just like those claiming election fraud in 2020, With no evidence either.

 

[Rawley]

Rawley, you have neither "directly" or "indirectly" evidence of Joe being corrupt.

Keep digging.

Keep whistling

 

[meaner gene]

Keep whistling

How about reading the law and telling me how any of the elements for charging a public official has been met?

 

[Rawley]

How about reading the law and telling me how any of the elements for charging a public official has been met?

Is this really rocker science for you ratty?

He indirectly demanded $$$$$$$$$ for influencing an official act. which words are you having difficulty with?

 

[MinTrut]

The saddest part about the Biden corruption scandal is that the obedient left wing Media helps cover it up.

Liberal, not left wing.

 

[meaner gene]

Is this really rocker science for you ratty?

He indirectly demanded $$$$$$$$$ for influencing an official act. which words are you having difficulty with?

By "he" do you mean Joe Biden?
You know there is no proof that Joe Biden was in contact with any of the people paying Hunter Biden. That's the first element that failed the evidence test.
What else you got?

 

[meaner gene]

Is this really rocker science for you ratty?

He indirectly demanded $$$$$$$$$ for influencing an official act. which words are you having difficulty with?

What official act? You know the VP has no executive authority. And any "official acts" he performs are at the request of the president, and done under the presidents authority.

So now you have Obama in the loop. And we know the Obama policy agreed with the EU policy, and Biden only executed.

 

[BlueGin]

The saddest part about the Biden corruption scandal is that the obedient left wing Media helps cover it up.

Well…Obama did embed the CIA in positions of power in media so…

 

[meaner gene]

Envoys pushed to oust Ukraine prosecutor before Biden

EU and US officials dispute Trump’s claim former vice-president acted to protect son

www.ft.com

Envoys pushed to oust Ukraine prosecutor before Biden

European and US officials pressed Ukraine to sack Viktor Shokin, the country’s former prosecutor-general, months before Joe Biden, the former US vice-president, personally intervened to force his removal

EU diplomats working on Ukraine at the time have, however, told the FT that they were looking for ways to persuade Kiev to remove Mr Shokin well before Mr Biden entered the picture. The push for Mr Shokin’s removal was part of an international effort to bolster Ukraine’s institutions

“It was Biden who finally came in [and triggered it]. Biden was the most vocal, as the US usually is. But we were all literally complaining about the prosecutor.”

 

[Rawley]

By "he" do you mean Joe Biden?
You know there is no proof that Joe Biden was in contact with any of the people paying Hunter Biden. That's the first element that failed the evidence test.
What else you got?

I have an understanding of what "indirect" means.

Ratty - if you are going to play up here, at least pretend to halfway intelligent.

 

[Rawley]

What official act? You know the VP has no executive authority. And any "official acts" he performs are at the request of the president, and done under the presidents authority.

So now you have Obama in the loop. And we know the Obama policy agreed with the EU policy, and Biden only executed.

Go for it Ratty, produce a single document dated prior to BIden's extortion of Ukraine that it was US policy that Shokin be fired.

 

[Lesh]

Biden Bribery Breadcrumbs Leave Only One Possible Conclusion: ​

Deep-State Partisans Buried The Evidence​

Who buried the Biden bribery scandal?
Mounting evidence of deep-state corruption and cover-ups demands an answer.​

Who Buried The Biden Bribery Scandal?

The Biden bribery breadcrumbs leave only one possible conclusion: Corrupt deep-state partisans buried the evidence.

thefederalist.com

6 Sep 2023 ~~ By Margot Cleveland

The Federalist’s blockbuster exclusive on Tuesday revealed U.S. Attorney David Weiss was spoonfed The New York Times’ false narrative that the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney had pushed the Delaware office to investigate Rudy Giuliani’s claims of Biden family corruption. That revelation adds new texture to the IRS whistleblowers’ earlier testimony. More importantly, it suggests a select few DOJ and FBI agents buried the FD-1023 sent to Delaware for further investigation — a report memorializing a “highly credible” FBI confidential human source’s claims that Burisma paid $5 million bribes each to Hunter and Joe Biden.
On Dec. 11, 2020, The New York Times ran an article titled, “Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of Hunter Biden.” As I previously detailed, the Times’ reporting was “replete with falsehoods and deceptive narratives,” and sought to paint the “then-U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Scott Brady, whom Barr had tasked with screening any new material related to Ukraine,” as a partisan hack out to get the Bidens. The article falsely represented Brady as pushing the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to investigate the Bidens based on material provided by Rudy Giuliani.
However, as a whistleblower would later confide in Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney’s office had sought the investigation not of Giuliani material, but of separate intel provided by a longtime and “highly credible” confidential human source (CHS) on which agents briefed the Delaware office.
As Grassley explained in a July 2023 letter to Weiss, “[O]n October 23, 2020, Justice Department and FBI Special Agents from the Pittsburgh Field Office briefed Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf, one of your top prosecutors, and FBI Special Agents from the Baltimore Field Office with respect to the contents of the FBI-generated FD-1023 alleging a criminal bribery scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden.”
Grassley would later release a minimally redacted copy of the FD-1023, which confirmed the information provided to the Delaware office came not from Giuliani, but from the CHS.
An individual familiar with that Oct. 23 meeting previously confirmed to The Federalist that Weiss was not present for it. That detail gained new significance last week when FOIA documents, obtained by the Heritage Foundation following its lawsuit against the DOJ, revealed that one of Weiss’s top assistant U.S. attorneys forwarded him the Times article portraying the Pittsburgh evidence as originating from Giuliani.
~Snip~
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?
Weiss has yet to answer that question. But IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley’s testimony and supplemental affidavit suggest Wolf and the Baltimore agents briefed by Pittsburgh about the FD-1023 buried that evidence.
During Shapley’s testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee, the IRS special agent made no mention of the FD-1023. Later, though, after former Attorney General William Barr confirmed to The Federalist that the FD-1023 had been sent to Delaware for further investigation, Shapley submitted a supplemental affidavit.
With the Times piece purportedly sourced to “five current and former law enforcement officials and others with knowledge of F.B.I. interactions with the Justice Department,” unless someone told Weiss about the FD-1023 or its contents, Weiss would have had no basis to know the Pittsburgh office had given the Delaware office independent evidence of Biden family corruption. And this was evidence that had already been partially corroborated, as the Pennsylvania-based agents detailed in the briefing on Oct. 23, 2020.
~Snip~
This again raises the question: Who knew of the FD-1023, and when did Weiss learn of its existence?
From Grassley’s whistleblower, it appears Wolf included at least two Baltimore field office agents in the brief. However, from Shapley’s testimony, it appears the Baltimore field agents Wolf allowed to participate in the briefing were not the ones working Hunter’s case — which makes no sense.
That is, unless you are trying to bury the evidence.
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?




Commentary:
Who buried the Biden Bribery Scandal?
Such a mystery, if only we had a clue, just one little bitty clue...
It’s like the guy looking for his dime under a street lamp..
I asked him ..”where did you drop it?”... he said” down the street near that tree.”
I asked “then why you looking for it here?” He said, ”there’s more light”, just can’t seem to find a clue anywhere....
We have paper trails of Biden treason, bribery and quid pro quo, witnesses, and an exorbitant tax debt after just 2 short years of Lesko Brandon. If Trump wins next term will anything of happened to any of the criminals being uncovered now? What about doin anything about the folks that lied, obfuscated, financed, made excuses for, covered up or hid anything illegal that helped the criminals we are finding about now to do what they have done?
Deep-State partisans cannot and won’t walk free very long to many spot lights on them and a lot of public anger will keep the heat on the hacks re-election it’s all they have going for them.
To many records have been kept.

In lieu of evidence....we are given....breadcrumbs

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Biden will pardon himself and Hunter before he leaves office.

None of this matters.

 

[GMCGeneral]

Liberal, not left wing.

A distinction without a difference.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

A distinction without a difference.

Actually, yes. There are regular RC and then heretics like you. That is a distinction with a difference.

 

[Arlette]

Biden Bribery Breadcrumbs Leave Only One Possible Conclusion: ​

Deep-State Partisans Buried The Evidence​

Who buried the Biden bribery scandal?
Mounting evidence of deep-state corruption and cover-ups demands an answer.​

Who Buried The Biden Bribery Scandal?

The Biden bribery breadcrumbs leave only one possible conclusion: Corrupt deep-state partisans buried the evidence.

thefederalist.com

6 Sep 2023 ~~ By Margot Cleveland

The Federalist’s blockbuster exclusive on Tuesday revealed U.S. Attorney David Weiss was spoonfed The New York Times’ false narrative that the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney had pushed the Delaware office to investigate Rudy Giuliani’s claims of Biden family corruption. That revelation adds new texture to the IRS whistleblowers’ earlier testimony. More importantly, it suggests a select few DOJ and FBI agents buried the FD-1023 sent to Delaware for further investigation — a report memorializing a “highly credible” FBI confidential human source’s claims that Burisma paid $5 million bribes each to Hunter and Joe Biden.
On Dec. 11, 2020, The New York Times ran an article titled, “Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of Hunter Biden.” As I previously detailed, the Times’ reporting was “replete with falsehoods and deceptive narratives,” and sought to paint the “then-U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Scott Brady, whom Barr had tasked with screening any new material related to Ukraine,” as a partisan hack out to get the Bidens. The article falsely represented Brady as pushing the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office to investigate the Bidens based on material provided by Rudy Giuliani.
However, as a whistleblower would later confide in Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Pittsburgh U.S. attorney’s office had sought the investigation not of Giuliani material, but of separate intel provided by a longtime and “highly credible” confidential human source (CHS) on which agents briefed the Delaware office.
As Grassley explained in a July 2023 letter to Weiss, “[O]n October 23, 2020, Justice Department and FBI Special Agents from the Pittsburgh Field Office briefed Assistant U.S. Attorney Lesley Wolf, one of your top prosecutors, and FBI Special Agents from the Baltimore Field Office with respect to the contents of the FBI-generated FD-1023 alleging a criminal bribery scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden.”
Grassley would later release a minimally redacted copy of the FD-1023, which confirmed the information provided to the Delaware office came not from Giuliani, but from the CHS.
An individual familiar with that Oct. 23 meeting previously confirmed to The Federalist that Weiss was not present for it. That detail gained new significance last week when FOIA documents, obtained by the Heritage Foundation following its lawsuit against the DOJ, revealed that one of Weiss’s top assistant U.S. attorneys forwarded him the Times article portraying the Pittsburgh evidence as originating from Giuliani.
~Snip~
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?
Weiss has yet to answer that question. But IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley’s testimony and supplemental affidavit suggest Wolf and the Baltimore agents briefed by Pittsburgh about the FD-1023 buried that evidence.
During Shapley’s testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee, the IRS special agent made no mention of the FD-1023. Later, though, after former Attorney General William Barr confirmed to The Federalist that the FD-1023 had been sent to Delaware for further investigation, Shapley submitted a supplemental affidavit.
With the Times piece purportedly sourced to “five current and former law enforcement officials and others with knowledge of F.B.I. interactions with the Justice Department,” unless someone told Weiss about the FD-1023 or its contents, Weiss would have had no basis to know the Pittsburgh office had given the Delaware office independent evidence of Biden family corruption. And this was evidence that had already been partially corroborated, as the Pennsylvania-based agents detailed in the briefing on Oct. 23, 2020.
~Snip~
This again raises the question: Who knew of the FD-1023, and when did Weiss learn of its existence?
From Grassley’s whistleblower, it appears Wolf included at least two Baltimore field office agents in the brief. However, from Shapley’s testimony, it appears the Baltimore field agents Wolf allowed to participate in the briefing were not the ones working Hunter’s case — which makes no sense.
That is, unless you are trying to bury the evidence.
So the key question, as Grassley asked Weiss, is when did he first learn of the FD-1023?




Commentary:
Who buried the Biden Bribery Scandal?
Such a mystery, if only we had a clue, just one little bitty clue...
It’s like the guy looking for his dime under a street lamp..
I asked him ..”where did you drop it?”... he said” down the street near that tree.”
I asked “then why you looking for it here?” He said, ”there’s more light”, just can’t seem to find a clue anywhere....
We have paper trails of Biden treason, bribery and quid pro quo, witnesses, and an exorbitant tax debt after just 2 short years of Lesko Brandon. If Trump wins next term will anything of happened to any of the criminals being uncovered now? What about doin anything about the folks that lied, obfuscated, financed, made excuses for, covered up or hid anything illegal that helped the criminals we are finding about now to do what they have done?
Deep-State partisans cannot and won’t walk free very long to many spot lights on them and a lot of public anger will keep the heat on the hacks re-election it’s all they have going for them.
To many records have been kept.

hehehe