Decision reached in Arbrey case

Has EVRYTHING to do with it, on the prosecution side (same as the Slager case)

IF it did, the jury could easily found all 3 innocent of the most grievous crimes, and found the guilty on minor ones, which would have resulted in minor time served, and strong options for bail.

Not one of the 3 defense attorneys made their case, and the only one of the defendants to take the stand, put his foot in his mouth, and asked for a noose.

Had nothing to do with the racial makeup of the jury, or the county.

just another fantasy on you part to claim they were railroaded.
 
Yep. That is a good description of your assumption that all 12 jurors are terrified liars who sent innocent men to jail. It is laughably stupid and desperate, and really adds a new level to your embarrassment.
Doesn't matter who they are, or what they thought. All that matters is the VIDEO which shows self-defense. All this other talk is fool jibberish
 
LOL

Well the jury saw all the evidence which you didn't see and reached the same conclusion I had been arguing here for some time now. So, no. You prove repeatedly you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Anybody wanna guess what Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and some of their colleagues were doing in the courtroom. Wanna guess what about 100 people assembled on the steps of the courtroom were doing there with Al Sharpton talking into microphones that were set up there for him ? (and referring to the Arbery daeth as a "lynching")

Wanna guess what effect the presence of these well-known race-baiter agitators had on the jury ? Wanna guess what was going through the minds of the jury from all that ? Their kids at school ? Their pregnant wife ? Themselves at their jobs, or even at their homes.

1638073741652.png
 
Last edited:
Anybody wanna guess what Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and some of their colleagues were doing in the courtroom. Wanna guess what about 100 people assembled on the steps of the courtroom were doing there with Al Sharpton talking into microphone that was set up there for him ? (and referring to the Arbery deth as a "lynching")

Wanna guess what effect the presence of these well-known race-baiter agitators had on the jury ? Wanna guess what was going through the minds of the jury from all that ? Their kids at school ? Their pregnant wife ? Themselves at their jobs, or even at their homes.
 
But that's a lie, and the video available shows they are murderers and got them convicted. Gotdam son. You are embarrassing yourself.
FALSE! The video clearly shows Arbery ATTACKING Travis McMichaels, and Travis defending himself. No question about it. Jury was obviously intimidated and coerced by Sharpton, Jackson, and their mobs. You look ridiculous.
 
IF it did, the jury could easily found all 3 innocent of the most grievous crimes, and found the guilty on minor ones, which would have resulted in minor time served, and strong options for bail.

Not one of the 3 defense attorneys made their case, and the only one of the defendants to take the stand, put his foot in his mouth, and asked for a noose.

Had nothing to do with the racial makeup of the jury, or the county.

just another fantasy on you part to claim they were railroaded.
That's completely OPPOSITE of the reality of this case. The jury was clearly intimidated by Sharpton, Jackson, Crump, and their mobs. They were probably thinking about what will happen to their kids at school.

Suppose YOU were on that jury. Suppose YOU had kids in school, and the black kids at school knew they were your kids. Starting to feel a little itchy ? Starting to get the idea ?
 
That's completely OPPOSITE of the reality of this case. The jury was clearly intimidated by Sharpton, Jackson, Crump, and their mobs. They were probably thinking about what will happen to their kids at school.

Suppose YOU were on that jury. Suppose YOU had kids in school, and the black kids at school knew they were your kids. Starting to feel a little itchy ? Starting to get the idea ?
:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top