Decision reached in Arbrey case

There was no "trial" - there was only a frameup, to appease the black community. This shit has to stop.

Obviously, the grounds for appeal are that Travis fired in self-defense. It all depends on where the appeal will be, and how its done. If they don't deliberately screw these 3 guys again, and it is a normal court, they will be acquitted, and they will sue the pants off the guys in the previous kangaroo court.
LOLOL

You're senile, gramps. :cuckoo:

Of course there was a trial. And self defense is a defense, it's not grounds for a new trial. :cuckoo:

As always, you demonstrate you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
The most relevant difference between the Arbery and the Rittenhouse cases is the 5th Amendment.

The McMichaels were willfully interrogated by the police.

Rittenhouse refused to be interrogated.

You have the right to remain silent! Anything you do say will be purposefully misconstrued by corrupt lying pigs and used against you.

Folks, if you ever have to shoot someone in self defense, ALWAYS invoke your constitutional rights.

Use them or lose them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top