Don’t know what you mean by suck up to God but it’s pretty easy to spot aggressors.Just the ones who condemn respect for those who hold religious beliefs.Seems fair...:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/cross-on-fire-172200333-5c7ff7e9c9e77c0001d19e22.jpg)
Militant Atheist Definition and Examples
Militant atheism requires an extreme hostility towards religious theism that entails a desire to see religion suppressed by force. Learn more.www.learnreligions.com
Militant atheist is defined as one who is militantly opposed to theism, theists, and religion. Militant atheists have an extreme hostility towards religious theism that entails a desire to see religion suppressed by force. The label militant atheist tends to be used interchangeably with fundamentalist atheist, new atheist, and anti-theist.This definition of militant atheist is usually meant pejoratively because the label is typically applied to atheists who do not seek the forced suppression of religion or theism. Instead, religious apologists apply the label "militant" to atheists generally — or at least any atheist that isn't quiet, meek, and obsequious.
IOW, you include christians who beat up Muslims, Asians and anyone who doesn't suck up to your particular god.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Debunking The Militant Atheists
- Thread starter Viktor
- Start date
If you don’t want to believe in God, don’t.No. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Did you already say which god you're talking about?
If so, I missed it.
There are plenty to choose from and IM(atheist)O, they're all equal and should have equal rights. Would you agree with that? If so, I'm cerrtain you would also agree that atheists have those same rights.
Or if you want to believe in ten gods, go right ahead.
How so?That should be a logical fallacy known as 'appeal to hypocrites'.The founding fathers thought enough of them.
I'm sure you believe that is what I have been saying.The founding fathers thought enough of them.Religious beliefs are not sacred cows...Just the ones who condemn respect for those who hold religious beliefs.
Wait.
What?
I thought you were talking about the US.
What the founding fathers of the United States believed was important was religious freedom. That's the exact opposite of what you've been saying.
But, since the US has a constitution that guarantees just that, you can spout your hate without fear of reprisal.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,790
- 2,615
Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left aloneNo. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Defenders of liberty enabling slavery. Hypocrisy at its finest.How so?That should be a logical fallacy known as 'appeal to hypocrites'.The founding fathers thought enough of them.
- Oct 26, 2011
- 16,674
- 1,328
- 85
You never make any sense.No. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying..No. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.
your denial of theistic socialism and secular humanism as a weapon disguised as your religious beliefs, christianity is neither religion nor creditable in deference to their proper role in society you are ill suited to deny against their right of self determination they have chosen for themselves.
.You never make any sense.
a matter of convenience for the equivocators ...
- are there theistic socialists / secular humanist or are they banded by the desert religions.
- is there a means without the need for a phony christian messiah. and their 4th century christian bible. as necessary for corrections required by the alteration of their phony book ...
- is phony ... a protection provided by common law.
Sure. That's true for the vast majority of atheists. I'm not talking about those. I'm talking about the ones who are on a mission to subordinate religion.Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left aloneNo. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Apparently you are ignorant of the history. You think you know the history, but you don't. You have accepted a narrative that was pleasing to your ears but have never really investigated it.Defenders of liberty enabling slavery. Hypocrisy at its finest.How so?That should be a logical fallacy known as 'appeal to hypocrites'.The founding fathers thought enough of them.
The only one equivocating is you. But that is understandable because your only purpose in this forum is to attack and denigrate Christianity.You never make any sense.No. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying..No. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.
your denial of theistic socialism and secular humanism as a weapon disguised as your religious beliefs, christianity is neither religion nor creditable in deference to their proper role in society you are ill suited to deny against their right of self determination they have chosen for themselves..You never make any sense.
a matter of convenience for the equivocators ...
- are there theistic socialists / secular humanist or are they banded by the desert religions.
- is there a means without the need for a phony christian messiah. and their 4th century christian bible. as necessary for corrections required by the alteration of their phony book ...
- is phony ... a protection provided by common law.
Yes, there are theistic socialists and secular humanists. And for the most part they go about their daily lives living and letting others live. That's not what you do though.
You don't want to debate theology. You want to insult and be disrespectful and dehumanize Christians. You are no different than Derek Chauvin or Adolf Hitler in that regard. The only difference between you and them is your target.
You openly and unabashedly display the worst behavior of mankind; intolerance of others. You want to homogenize others. I want them to be diverse and respectful as those are not mutually exclusive terms.
Tell me the liberty defending founders didn't hypocritically enable slavery in exchange for constitutional ratification. Go on, tell me that.Apparently you are ignorant of the history.
Yes, but only because they couldn't do both at the same time. But they did take parallel steps to end slavery. They negotiated a date to end the importation of slavery and put it in the constitution, they followed through on the earliest date allowed to abolish the importation of slavery and they halted the expansion of slavery by writing laws.Tell me the liberty defending founders didn't hypocritically enable slavery in exchange for constitutional ratification. Go on, tell me that.Apparently you are ignorant of the history.
So when you label them as hypocritical, that isn't really correct. They did the best they could with what they had. Even Frederick Douglas agreed that the constitution was an anti-slavery document. Even Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederate States, acknowledged that the Founding Fathers believed that slavery was wrong but could not end it and found the nation.
I can't imagine why any American would disparage the Founding fathers like you did.
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
Its impossible to subordinate something everyone has. I think you are looking for religion other than their own, which is accurate.That it’s ok to subordinate religion?
So you consider your belief system and habits as a result of that belief system a "fairy tale"?religion is a fairy tale
All people are people of faith, bar none.They condemn respect for people of faith.
4001 when you include atheism.There are something like 4000 gods and countless religions.
You think not? Challenge someones religion and see what happens.Religious beliefs are not sacred cows...
It takes much more than a few words to know its a disguise.your denial of theistic socialism and secular humanism as a weapon disguised as your religious beliefs,
If you believe the constitution that all religions have equal rights.There are plenty to choose from and IM(atheist)O, they're all equal and should have equal rights.
Ive known several evangelistic atheists pounding the streets preaching atheism.Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left alone
religion is a 'reserved right' in which the agreement between the guv and the people was memorialized om the BoR.- is phony ... a protection provided by common law.
History says otherwise.Its impossible to subordinate something everyone has.
"...It is especially easy for us to observe socialism's hostility to religion, for this is inherent, with few exceptions, in all contemporary socialist states and doctrines. Only rarely is the abolition of religion legislated, as it was in Albania. But the actions of other socialist states leave no doubt that they are all governed by this very principle and that only external difficulties have prevented its complete implementation. This same principle has been repeatedly proclaimed in socialist doctrines, beginning with the end of the seventeenth century. Sixteenth- and seventeenth-century doctrines are imbued with cold skeptical and ironic attitudes toward religion. If not consciously, then "objectively," they prepared humanity for the convergence of socialist ideology and militant atheism that took place at the end of the seventeenth century and during the course of the eighteenth. The heretical movements of the Middle Ages were religious in character, but those in which socialist tendencies were especially pronounced were the ones that were irrevocably opposed to the actual religion professed by the majority at the time. Calls to assassinate the Pope and to annihilate all monks and priests run like a red thread through the history of these movements. Their hatred for the basic symbols of Christianity--the cross and the church--is very striking. We encounter the burning of crosses and the profanation of churches from the first centuries of Christianity right up to the present day..."
Throughout our nation's history, churches have done what no government can ever do, namely teach morality and civility. Moral and civil individuals are largely governed by their own sense of right and wrong, and hence have little need for external government. This is the real reason the collectivist Left hates religion: Churches as institutions compete with the state for the people's allegiance, and many devout people put their faith in God before putting their faith in the state. Knowing this, the secularists wage an ongoing war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation's Christian heritage.
Dr. Ron Paul
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,790
- 2,615
Read this Religion Board on USMB.Sure. That's true for the vast majority of atheists. I'm not talking about those. I'm talking about the ones who are on a mission to subordinate religion.Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left aloneNo. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Find me a thread where an Atheist started it to debunk religion.
What you will find is thread after thread started by Bible Thumpers to attack atheism
Seriously? I post here all the time. The majority of their posts are intended to be disrespectful.Read this Religion Board on USMB.Sure. That's true for the vast majority of atheists. I'm not talking about those. I'm talking about the ones who are on a mission to subordinate religion.Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left aloneNo. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Find me a thread where an Atheist started it to debunk religion.
What you will find is thread after thread started by Bible Thumpers to attack atheism
So why is it so bad for me to say what it is?
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,171
- 140,790
- 2,615
Atheists on this board respond to attacks and there are a lot of them.Seriously? I post here all the time. The majority of their posts are intended to be disrespectful.Read this Religion Board on USMB.Sure. That's true for the vast majority of atheists. I'm not talking about those. I'm talking about the ones who are on a mission to subordinate religion.Not really, atheists just don’t believe God makes sense and want to be left aloneNo. God. Militant atheists condemn respect for people who believe in God and attempt to subordinate their worship of God.GodSure. I can give you examples but it's a long read.About what? That it’s ok to subordinate religion?Atheists are right
Can you give examples of that please?
Oh wait - You mean like christians attacking Muslims and others who don't share their beliefs? That's what you mean, isn't it.
Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that..Yes, militant atheists condemning respect for people of faith would be exactly like that.
faith in what ... explain yourself..
you mean yourself ... that's your faith, try explaining what you are saying.
Find me a thread where an Atheist started it to debunk religion.
What you will find is thread after thread started by Bible Thumpers to attack atheism
So why is it so bad for me to say what it is?
If you can’t stand the response, don’t start the thread
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
Most people are.Apparently you are ignorant of the history.
Most people do.You have accepted a narrative that was pleasing to your ears but have never really investigated it.
That is not an accurate representation of hitler.Adolf Hitler in that regard.
How?Tell me the liberty defending founders didn't hypocritically enable slavery in exchange for constitutional ratification. Go on, tell me that.
They took steps to end economic disparity, not end slavery.they did take parallel steps to end slavery.
Agreed.They negotiated a date to end the importation of slavery
Disagree, 14th amendment.they halted the expansion of slavery by writing laws.
Depends on the issue, some yes others no.So when you label them as hypocritical, that isn't really correct.
No, the north had and kept their slaves after the civil war. Jefferson I think is one of them.the Founding Fathers believed that slavery was wrong
They were constitutors, they founded nothing what so ever, it was mostly a copy paste job direct out of the uk.I can't imagine why any American would disparage the Founding fathers like you did.
Last edited:
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
contemporary socialism typically has an underlying 'ism' at its core, we know as 'atheism', and of course many neoatheists of today consider themselves exempt from the label religious, though nothing could be farther from the truth however."...It is especially easy for us to observe socialism's hostility to religion, for this is inherent, with few exceptions, in all contemporary socialist states and doctrines.
Last edited:
- Oct 2, 2013
- 2,180
- 185
- 85
So then atheists on this board never use pejoratives, like flying spaghetti monster? Sky pilot? Man in the sky? etc etc etc without provocation?Atheists on this board respond to attacks and there are a lot of them.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 320
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 104
- Replies
- 89
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 158
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 378
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 334
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 90
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8049
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-