bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,028
- 280
DOJ will home in on Ferguson traffic stop numbers News
Well well well. Let the lies see sunlight.
This article talks about one DOJ boogie man myth:
"Ferguson blacks far more likely to be searched than whites".
Yes. But...Holders DOJ...as the story says...counted "search incident to arrest" as a "search". Meaning...cops charge you...THEN search you before taking you to jail.
And it says of ALL blacks searched...."search incident to arrest" was BY FAR the #1 cause for blacks to be searched...AND by far the "majority" of those arrests were for.......drum roll please.....OUTSTANDING WARRANTS.
YES.
Blacks were NOT subjected to mass random searches. They were mostly searched AFTER arrest....and most of those arrests were due to having WARRANTS.
SO Eric Holders findings could just as easily have read "Blacks more likely to commit arrestable crimes or have warrants...and thus get searched after being placed under arrest."
So the "bias" was what? That cops arrested blacks...for crimes and warrants...and searched them? What the fuck do they want them to do? Ignore crime? NOT SEARCH a wanted man before taking him into jail booking?
What a piece of shit this administration is to attempt such an irresponsible smear job like this. Blacks got searched more often than whites...because blacks had outstanding warrants fsr more often and Holder decided to count "search incident to arrest" as equal statistically to a consent or probable cause search.
He did that on purpose because he KNEW more blacks get arrested and have outstanding warrants.....so there would be far more post-arrest searches and would create a VERY misleading stat.
Well well well. Let the lies see sunlight.
This article talks about one DOJ boogie man myth:
"Ferguson blacks far more likely to be searched than whites".
Yes. But...Holders DOJ...as the story says...counted "search incident to arrest" as a "search". Meaning...cops charge you...THEN search you before taking you to jail.
And it says of ALL blacks searched...."search incident to arrest" was BY FAR the #1 cause for blacks to be searched...AND by far the "majority" of those arrests were for.......drum roll please.....OUTSTANDING WARRANTS.
YES.
Blacks were NOT subjected to mass random searches. They were mostly searched AFTER arrest....and most of those arrests were due to having WARRANTS.
SO Eric Holders findings could just as easily have read "Blacks more likely to commit arrestable crimes or have warrants...and thus get searched after being placed under arrest."
So the "bias" was what? That cops arrested blacks...for crimes and warrants...and searched them? What the fuck do they want them to do? Ignore crime? NOT SEARCH a wanted man before taking him into jail booking?
What a piece of shit this administration is to attempt such an irresponsible smear job like this. Blacks got searched more often than whites...because blacks had outstanding warrants fsr more often and Holder decided to count "search incident to arrest" as equal statistically to a consent or probable cause search.
He did that on purpose because he KNEW more blacks get arrested and have outstanding warrants.....so there would be far more post-arrest searches and would create a VERY misleading stat.