DEBUNKED: Stl news exposes Holders lies about Ferguson Police!

Lol at liberals. Just mock the brainwashed brainwashing socialist pigs.

Fuck you, you pieces of shit.
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.

But if you have a perception that a certain race of people commit crimes, then aren't you going to think every person of that race is a criminal waiting to happen and are suspicious of anything they are doing?

Like when you see a group of white people hanging out and a group of black people hanging out, do you automatically think one of those groups are up to no good? With police, they frequently stop groups of black people because of the "suppression of serious crime" mentality because they are going to commit a crime at some point right? There are black, they can't handle freedom right? (1870s mentality btw)
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.

But if you have a perception that a certain race of people commit crimes, then aren't you going to think every person of that race is a criminal waiting to happen and are suspicious of anything they are doing?

Like when you see a group of white people hanging out and a group of black people hanging out, do you automatically think one of those groups are up to no good? With police, they frequently stop groups of black people because of the "suppression of serious crime" mentality because they are going to commit a crime at some point right? There are black, they can't handle freedom right? (1870s mentality btw)

I'll give you that. Thats a human flaw. If you saw 5 white basketball players and 5 black ones...subconsciously you'd think the black 5 would be a better team...because black kids dominate the NBA.

BUT I also bet if those same cops were asked to guess what a meth head, serial killer, pedophile looked like...they'll guess middle age white male.

You tell me how to deprogram a human brain's past experiences. ..and then we'll discuss further.
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.

But if you have a perception that a certain race of people commit crimes, then aren't you going to think every person of that race is a criminal waiting to happen and are suspicious of anything they are doing?

Like when you see a group of white people hanging out and a group of black people hanging out, do you automatically think one of those groups are up to no good? With police, they frequently stop groups of black people because of the "suppression of serious crime" mentality because they are going to commit a crime at some point right? There are black, they can't handle freedom right? (1870s mentality btw)

Like I said. They are utter wastes of time. They are all pieces of brainwashed brainwashing shit.
 
Eric-Holder-wont-talk-about-radical-Islam.png.cf.jpg
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.

But if you have a perception that a certain race of people commit crimes, then aren't you going to think every person of that race is a criminal waiting to happen and are suspicious of anything they are doing?

Like when you see a group of white people hanging out and a group of black people hanging out, do you automatically think one of those groups are up to no good? With police, they frequently stop groups of black people because of the "suppression of serious crime" mentality because they are going to commit a crime at some point right? There are black, they can't handle freedom right? (1870s mentality btw)

I'll give you that. Thats a human flaw. If you saw 5 white basketball players and 5 black ones...subconsciously you'd think the black 5 would be a better team...because black kids dominate the NBA.

BUT I also bet if those same cops were asked to guess what a meth head, serial killer, pedophile looked like...they'll guess middle age white male.

You tell me how to deprogram a human brain's past experiences. ..and then we'll discuss further.

The biggest obstacle is awareness. If you are aware that you are making general biases towards a group of people, then yes it's a problem.

They are all mental shortcuts we make because we believe the human brain can't handle evaluating every situation. I don't believe in that fully but we should evolve better for future generations. But if you are aware of the biases you are making and questioning why you are making that judgment, it can help. The biggest problem is when you have that flaw with humans and give them authority that requires people to submit to that authority. If they are making that bias towards someone who isn't doing something but they "believe" they are doing something, that's a problem.

Most of our jail system is filled with minorities with most being non-violent drug offenders. How does that happen? Well, police stop more minorities, police search more minorities, the greater chance they will find drugs on them. So they go to jail and it ruins their life while they aren't stopping whites at a normal rate. So even though drug use is equal among the races, the higher frequency of stops on minorities create the higher rate of incarceration of minorities. And we all know the difficulty of someone with a felony to get a job, so that just creates a career criminal either in drug dealing, selling bootleg DVDs or other things that is deemed illegal. Then they don't have the tools to get out of the cycle.

Then the perception that minorities are criminals get perpetuated. I mention the 1870s mentality, you should probably understand where that began in the US. Slavery by another name.
 
Yep. They spent months and millions of dollars trying to find some statistical twist to enable them to say "See told ya so they're racist".

Meanwhile...hispanic drug cartel and ISIS sympathizers keep growning in America.

So emails stating that "No black can hold a job for 4 years." and "Crimestoppers gave a check to a black woman who aborted her fetus" is not racist? There were more than just the stops but I like how you ignored that part.

But you hit on a crucial point. Racial and socioeconomic targeting.

I have a police friend who said they were always on the lookout for "warrant cars". I asked him what he meant and he said "older cars with some damage to them" and I asked why "They likely have an FTA warrant out and if they don't we just write them a ticket."

So you have two cars, both speeding, one is a Mercedes and the other is a 1988 Ford escort. Who is more likely to have the money to pay a ticket? More times than not, the Mercedes. But who gets pulled over? The Escort. That is socioeconomic targeting. They won't go after the rich person because that person can cause problems for them and make their job harder because they have the money to fight them. But a poor person doesn't have that power. No one cares about the abuse of poor people so these authority figures take advantage. They run them through the ringer and even abuse their power to get what they want, like sex.

So they pull them over, find out they have no warrant but give them a ticket. The fine is $150. You can't hire an attorney to fight it so you either pay the fine of $150 (plus $50 court cost) or go to jail. You make only $300 gross a week, take home around $225. So can a poor person really afford to pay that? No. So what do they do? Create a bench warrant for their arrest.

Months or years later, they get stopped and the warrant is found and they are arrested. Again, they have no money to pay the original fine nor money to get out of jail. So then the bail is set at the fine amount and the family has to find a way to pay the fine or the person will be stuck in jail until the judge determines they have served enough for the infraction.

But now, they likely lost their job, have no income and any job they apply for will throw their app out because they have an arrest record.

Now, who are the majority of poor people in this country? Blacks and Hispanics. Who are targeted mostly? Blacks and hispanics.

So since they are poor, ignorant people think they are lazy (See Ferguson email #1) and then they are cirminals (See Email #2) and then you see a black person on the street, what are you thinking? That person is a lazy criminal and I have to stop him.

And the cycle begins again.

That's the whole point, they are targeting the poorest people for these violations and thus keeping them in the perpetual state of poverty.

You're wrong on some stuff.

If, as Holder says, the police are a revenue tool...they'd target people who CAN afford it. A rich businessman gets a $150 speeding ticket? Chump change. He'd mail the fine in and not think twice about it. I used to work the Buckhead area of Atlanta. Rich people almost NEVER give cops "trouble" when they get tickets. They see it as annoying. But...Atlanta didnt send nearly as many cops there because CRIME was so much lower.

Rich people never fight petty tickets. Their lawyers cost more per hour than the fine is anyway. Cops would quadruple revenue if they abandoned the ghetto...and focused on rich areas.

Poor people dont pay tickets. And cities LOSE money on jailing them. Its like running a cheap hotel where no one pays anyway.

If it was about revenue...they'd target the rich, and rarely jail anyone. If police departments were businesses theyd go bankrupt. They go for the customers who are LEAST likely to pay and use a practice (jail) that sucks revenue internally and produces almost none.

Saying its about revenue is flat retarded.

Its about suppression of serious crimes through heavy police patrols. Its ugly. But it works.

But if you have a perception that a certain race of people commit crimes, then aren't you going to think every person of that race is a criminal waiting to happen and are suspicious of anything they are doing?

Like when you see a group of white people hanging out and a group of black people hanging out, do you automatically think one of those groups are up to no good? With police, they frequently stop groups of black people because of the "suppression of serious crime" mentality because they are going to commit a crime at some point right? There are black, they can't handle freedom right? (1870s mentality btw)

I'll give you that. Thats a human flaw. If you saw 5 white basketball players and 5 black ones...subconsciously you'd think the black 5 would be a better team...because black kids dominate the NBA.

BUT I also bet if those same cops were asked to guess what a meth head, serial killer, pedophile looked like...they'll guess middle age white male.

You tell me how to deprogram a human brain's past experiences. ..and then we'll discuss further.

The biggest obstacle is awareness. If you are aware that you are making general biases towards a group of people, then yes it's a problem.

They are all mental shortcuts we make because we believe the human brain can't handle evaluating every situation. I don't believe in that fully but we should evolve better for future generations. But if you are aware of the biases you are making and questioning why you are making that judgment, it can help. The biggest problem is when you have that flaw with humans and give them authority that requires people to submit to that authority. If they are making that bias towards someone who isn't doing something but they "believe" they are doing something, that's a problem.

Most of our jail system is filled with minorities with most being non-violent drug offenders. How does that happen? Well, police stop more minorities, police search more minorities, the greater chance they will find drugs on them. So they go to jail and it ruins their life while they aren't stopping whites at a normal rate. So even though drug use is equal among the races, the higher frequency of stops on minorities create the higher rate of incarceration of minorities. And we all know the difficulty of someone with a felony to get a job, so that just creates a career criminal either in drug dealing, selling bootleg DVDs or other things that is deemed illegal. Then they don't have the tools to get out of the cycle.

Then the perception that minorities are criminals get perpetuated. I mention the 1870s mentality, you should probably understand where that began in the US. Slavery by another name.

I dont agree mostly...but your point bas some merit. No doubt there are individuals who are very bias. Ive never argued there arent. I arge that its a very small %.

But...to your point...some of the most bias cops are also the most proactive. So that small % accounts for a high % of stops. That is a problem the police have to deal with.

As for the bias that we supposedly dont know we have...thats tricky. An "unconscious bias" is almost an oxymoron. I worked in an almost all black hood in Atlanta. I didnt think all criminals were black or vice versa.

But I saw the crime reports. Murder. Rape. Aggravated assault. Auto theft. Robbery. Shootings. The vast majority of violent crimes usually happened...in the areas where past stats predicted they would. A crime mapping analysis would say future crimes have a higher chance of happening at X areas.

We'd be told patrol those areas hard.

And sure enough....those crimes happened. The color of the people didnt matter. But if someone asked where will the next 5 robberies happen....the Grady Homes or Buckhead....no cop would say Buckhead.

And you wouldn't either if you saw the crime stats and trends.

Your comment about a culture that creates career criminals is spot on though. Ive never been in favor of petty law enforcement like the loosy cigarettes or bootleg videos. Cops are for real crime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top