Of course they need to state what criteria they are looking for and Pence was a successful governor of Indiana for four years, while there is no proof that Harris ever accomplished much of anything and is not qualified by experience tro handle the complexities of being a top executive.
Susan Rice would have been far more capable, but she was Obama's dirty deeds hack and would have too many hatchets out for her.
That is a great question.
I am not talking about subjective opinion, the guy was able to run the state well enough and did not cause a disaster, the economy of the state improved, etc.
That is a great question.
Let's use an analogy.
Suppose you needed a manager to run your other store while you worked at your main store, and you have only two.
Who would you pick to run that other store across town?
1) Gabbard
2) Feinstein
3) Harris
4) Klobuchar
5) Warren
6) Harris
If you picked Harris you are silly and not engaging in the conversation honestly. You would want a person with managerial training and experience, of which Harris has none as far as top executive experience is concerned..
And why would Obama's VP need credibility among black voters? He needed an Hispanic more than a black VP in simple terms.
But picking the best person for the job is usually the way to go, but of course, that would leave us with 90% men in politics, though, wouldn't it?
That is a great question.
Let's use an analogy.
Suppose you needed a manager to run your other store while you worked at your main store, and you have only two.
Who would you pick to run that other store across town?
1) Gabbard
2) Feinstein
3) Harris
4) Klobuchar
5) Warren
6) Harris
If you picked Harris you are silly and not engaging in the conversation honestly. You would want a person with managerial training and experience, of which Harris has none as far as top executive experience is concerned..
And why would Obama's VP need credibility among black voters? He needed an Hispanic more than a black VP in simple terms.
But picking the best person for the job is usually the way to go, but of course, that would leave us with 90% men in politics, though, wouldn't it?
That is a great question.
Let's use an analogy.
Suppose you needed a manager to run your other store while you worked at your main store, and you have only two.
Who would you pick to run that other store across town?
1) Gabbard
2) Feinstein
3) Harris
4) Klobuchar
5) Warren
6) Harris
If you picked Harris you are silly and not engaging in the conversation honestly. You would want a person with managerial training and experience, of which Harris has none as far as top executive experience is concerned..
And why would Obama's VP need credibility among black voters? He needed an Hispanic more than a black VP in simple terms.
But picking the best person for the job is usually the way to go, but of course, that would leave us with 90% men in politics, though, wouldn't it?
Off that list it would have been Warren. I might disagree with her political stances but Warren was more qualified and would have gave Biden the woman he needed to pacify Sanders but not Cortez.
I agree sooner or later one of the major political parties will have to take a Latino/Hispanic for VP or President...
That is a great question.
Let's use an analogy.
Suppose you needed a manager to run your other store while you worked at your main store, and you have only two.
Who would you pick to run that other store across town?
1) Gabbard
2) Feinstein
3) Harris
4) Klobuchar
5) Warren
6) Harris
If you picked Harris you are silly and not engaging in the conversation honestly. You would want a person with managerial training and experience, of which Harris has none as far as top executive experience is concerned..
And why would Obama's VP need credibility among black voters? He needed an Hispanic more than a black VP in simple terms.
But picking the best person for the job is usually the way to go, but of course, that would leave us with 90% men in politics, though, wouldn't it?
Off that list it would have been Warren. I might disagree with her political stances but Warren was more qualified and would have gave Biden the woman he needed to pacify Sanders but not Cortez.
I agree sooner or later one of the major political parties will have to take a Latino/Hispanic for VP or President...
One thing though, that this election showed. Hispanics are not one unified demographic. They are diverse. There is a big difference between those from Cuba and those from Mexico for example.
And I and millions of other people that voted for Trump are sick to death of political needs causing the gradual decay and degeneration of our economy, our miulitary and the integrity of our elections.
Personally I would pick Gabbard, but Klobuchar was the most qualified to step in as POTUS IMO.That is a great question.
Let's use an analogy.
Suppose you needed a manager to run your other store while you worked at your main store, and you have only two.
Who would you pick to run that other store across town?
1) Gabbard
2) Feinstein
3) Harris
4) Klobuchar
5) Warren
6) Harris
If you picked Harris you are silly and not engaging in the conversation honestly. You would want a person with managerial training and experience, of which Harris has none as far as top executive experience is concerned..
And why would Obama's VP need credibility among black voters? He needed an Hispanic more than a black VP in simple terms.
But picking the best person for the job is usually the way to go, but of course, that would leave us with 90% men in politics, though, wouldn't it?
Off that list it would have been Warren. I might disagree with her political stances but Warren was more qualified and would have gave Biden the woman he needed to pacify Sanders but not Cortez.
I agree sooner or later one of the major political parties will have to take a Latino/Hispanic for VP or President...
Where do you get your news?
Recruitment push fuels record number of women in House GOP
House Republican women are on track to at least double their ranks after the 2020 election.www.politico.com
At least 31 Republican women will serve in the 117th Congress, breaking a previous record
Women continue to break glass ceilings in Congress.thehill.com
More women than ever before were elected to Congress — Here are their historic 'firsts'
The 2020 election cycle has proven that the future for women in politics is brighter than ever before.www.nbcnews.com
Cori Bush makes history: How women candidates made history in the 2020 election
A record number of women and women of color ran for Congress in 2020.abcnews.go.com
Your crickets never chirped. I suggest you get a refund.
Took them long enough.
The point was that would have been headline news right away if they were lesbian nazi hookers, abducted by aliens and forced into weight loss clinics.
Actually, my search to the past week. My initial had older articles on the number of women running for office in the Republican Party. Maybe your news outlet chooses not to show you this?(I still say you should get a refund on those crickets).
