Crickets-over-republicans-adding-11-new-female-representatives-in-the-house

[martybegan]

They don't count as women because they are the "wrong" women.

Crickets Over Republicans Adding 11 New Female Representatives in the House

Don’t expect a million articles in the @washingtonpost describing how angry women are fighting back against being defined as single issue voters, you probably won’t see them on @TIME covers, but here is what you will see, at least a dozen NEW REPUBLICAN female faces in Congress!

Where do you get your news?

Recruitment push fuels record number of women in House GOP

House Republican women are on track to at least double their ranks after the 2020 election.

www.politico.com

At least 31 Republican women will serve in the 117th Congress, breaking a previous record

Women continue to break glass ceilings in Congress.

thehill.com

More women than ever before were elected to Congress — Here are their historic 'firsts'

The 2020 election cycle has proven that the future for women in politics is brighter than ever before.

www.nbcnews.com

Recruitment push fuels record-number of women in House GOP

Cori Bush makes history: How women candidates made history in the 2020 election

A record number of women and women of color ran for Congress in 2020.

abcnews.go.com

Your crickets never chirped. I suggest you get a refund.

Took them long enough.

The point was that would have been headline news right away if they were lesbian nazi hookers, abducted by aliens and forced into weight loss clinics.

 

[Coyote]

They don't count as women because they are the "wrong" women.

Crickets Over Republicans Adding 11 New Female Representatives in the House

Don’t expect a million articles in the @washingtonpost describing how angry women are fighting back against being defined as single issue voters, you probably won’t see them on @TIME covers, but here is what you will see, at least a dozen NEW REPUBLICAN female faces in Congress!

Where do you get your news?

Recruitment push fuels record number of women in House GOP

House Republican women are on track to at least double their ranks after the 2020 election.

www.politico.com

At least 31 Republican women will serve in the 117th Congress, breaking a previous record

Women continue to break glass ceilings in Congress.

thehill.com

More women than ever before were elected to Congress — Here are their historic 'firsts'

The 2020 election cycle has proven that the future for women in politics is brighter than ever before.

www.nbcnews.com

Recruitment push fuels record-number of women in House GOP

Cori Bush makes history: How women candidates made history in the 2020 election

A record number of women and women of color ran for Congress in 2020.

abcnews.go.com

Your crickets never chirped. I suggest you get a refund.

Took them long enough.

The point was that would have been headline news right away if they were lesbian nazi hookers, abducted by aliens and forced into weight loss clinics.

Actually, my search to the past week. My initial had older articles on the number of women running for office in the Republican Party. Maybe your news outlet chooses not to show you this? (I still say you should get a refund on those crickets).

 

[JoeB131]

So I assume you fight all your own fires, grow your all your own food, and slaughter all your own animals?

No, but I don't ask anyone to DIE to do those things.

The problem with you CHICKENHAWKS is that you are more than happy to send other people's kids off to war.

I have my wonderful plan for piece. Bring back the draft, and take the kids of all the wealthy and politicians and put them in an elite airborne unit that will be the first deployed to a war zone.

Peace in our time.

But of course, it's better for the rich to get us into wars, and send the kids of the POOR out to fight.

 

[JimBowie1958]

They don't count as women because they are the "wrong" women.

Crickets Over Republicans Adding 11 New Female Representatives in the House

Don’t expect a million articles in the @washingtonpost describing how angry women are fighting back against being defined as single issue voters, you probably won’t see them on @TIME covers, but here is what you will see, at least a dozen NEW REPUBLICAN female faces in Congress!

It doesnt count for the Marxist Corporate Media unless the women are Marxists too

 

[JimBowie1958]

Actually, my search to the past week. My initial had older articles on the number of women running for office in the Republican Party. Maybe your news outlet chooses not to show you this? (I still say you should get a refund on those crickets).

You know what he is obviously talking about.

why do you libs use these cheap semantic sleight of hand rhetoric devices on serious topics?

No one buys that crap.

 

[JimBowie1958]

So I assume you fight all your own fires, grow your all your own food, and slaughter all your own animals?

Obviously he doesnt, but for the sake of argument he will lie just like any other Commiecrat.

 

[Coyote]

Actually, my search to the past week. My initial had older articles on the number of women running for office in the Republican Party. Maybe your news outlet chooses not to show you this? (I still say you should get a refund on those crickets).

You know what he is obviously talking about.

why do you libs use these cheap semantic sleight of hand rhetoric devices on serious topics?

No one buys that crap.

I absolutely know what he is talking about. He is making a claim fed to him by his rightwing echochamber, without bothering to actually look for himself. Just like you are doing. I listed a number of MAIN STREAM NEWS sources talking about more women running and winning in political office. What do you cons not understand? Why don't you do your own search? A serious topic "news doesn't report record number of republican women winning office" that is based on a lie is not a "serious topic".

 

[Coyote]

They don't count as women because they are the "wrong" women.

Crickets Over Republicans Adding 11 New Female Representatives in the House

Don’t expect a million articles in the @washingtonpost describing how angry women are fighting back against being defined as single issue voters, you probably won’t see them on @TIME covers, but here is what you will see, at least a dozen NEW REPUBLICAN female faces in Congress!

It doesnt count for the Marxist Corporate Media unless the women are Marxists too

Clearly you don't read any media beyond your echo chamber.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I absolutely know what he is talking about. He is making a claim fed to him by his rightwing echochamber, without bothering to actually look for himself. Just like you are doing. I listed a number of MAIN STREAM NEWS sources talking about more women running and winning in political office. What do you cons not understand? Why don't you do your own search? A serious topic "news doesn't report record number of republican women winning office" that is based on a lie is not a "serious topic".

I did do a search and the stories are thin soup, very thin soup.

There are ten times more declaring Harris our first black VP, and she isnt black.

I repeat, for brevity; you know what he means and yet you go through this semantic posturing that you dont and he is wrong.

No one buys it so why do you do it?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Clearly you don't read any media beyond your echo chamber.

I read the news from Europe, Russia, India and China too.

I can tell you that the communist nations are pleased with Biden winning, that the globalist export of American jobs will resume and the borders will be thrown wide open to the impoverishment of our own children.

so go back to sleep and have sweet dreams, Coyote, it is all you have left.

 

[Coyote]

I absolutely know what he is talking about. He is making a claim fed to him by his rightwing echochamber, without bothering to actually look for himself. Just like you are doing. I listed a number of MAIN STREAM NEWS sources talking about more women running and winning in political office. What do you cons not understand? Why don't you do your own search? A serious topic "news doesn't report record number of republican women winning office" that is based on a lie is not a "serious topic".

I did do a search and the stories are thin soup, very thin soup.

There are ten times more declaring Harris our first black VP, and she isnt black.

I repeat, for brevity; you know what he means and yet you go through this semantic posturing that you dont and he is wrong.

No one buys it so why do you do it?

A woman, being the first VP, is a Big Deal. It is a FIRST. So yes. There are going to be more stories on it. And there should be. After 250 years we finally have a WOMAN elected the second highest office in the country.

Insisting that that somehow stores on the number of women running for the House is somehow equivalent is dishonest.

What you are doing here, or rather the OP, is what you on the right constantly seem to do. You point out something and claim it isn't being covered in the msn news as some sort of example of bias yet a look in the news typically shows that yes, it has been covered. So then you call it "semantics" and try and draw a false equivalency to support your claim. Compare it to the coverage of Democrat women being elected this term. Most of the articles I found were about BOTH in fact. So what wasn't covered?

 

[Coyote]

Clearly you don't read any media beyond your echo chamber.

I read the news from Europe, Russia, India and China too.

I can tell you that the communist nations are pleased with Biden winning, that the globalist export of American jobs will resume and the borders will be thrown wide open to the impoverishment of our own children.

so go back to sleep and have sweet dreams, Coyote, it is all you have left.

I do as well. Most countries give a formal congratulations. Where I am seeing joy is countries that have been our allies traditionally - Western Europe, Canada, etc. Where I am seeing negative reactions towards it are those countries that are turning away from democratic ideals and towards authoritarianism - Hungary, Poland, for example, where President Trump had been forging closer relationships.

 

[JimBowie1958]

A woman, being the first VP, is a Big Deal. It is a FIRST. So yes. There are going to be more stories on it. And there should be. After 250 years we finally have a WOMAN elected the second highest office in the country.
Insisting that that somehow stores on the number of women running for the House is somehow equivalent is dishonest.
What you are doing here, or rather the OP, is what you on the right constantly seem to do. You point out something and claim it isn't being covered in the msn news as some sort of example of bias yet a look in the news typically shows that yes, it has been covered. So then you call it "semantics" and try and draw a false equivalency to support your claim. Compare it to the coverage of Democrat women being elected this term. Most of the articles I found were about BOTH in fact. So what wasn't covered?

It would be a big deal if Harris had earned it, but instead, it was one of those phoney 'first of its kind' type of things that puts the lie to the notion that it was for anything but the histrionics.

No, Harris was chosen solely for her intersectional qualities she was born with and never earned.

I am not impressed by that.

Women in the GOP get what they get because they work hard to deserve it on their merits, not Harris though.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I do as well. Most countries give a formal congratulations. Where I am seeing joy is countries that have been our allies traditionally - Western Europe, Canada, etc. Where I am seeing negative reactions towards it are those countries that are turning away from democratic ideals and towards authoritarianism - Hungary, Poland, for example, where President Trump had been forging closer relationships.

And the countries that celebrate Biden's premature win are also suffering from the same ills they want to re-inflict on us.

Anemic economic growth rates, Critical Race theory racism, more socialism, and a shrinking demographic growth rate that requires more and more immigration to replace the babies the Middle Class can not afford to bear and raise.

We the American working class dont want any of that BS.

 

[Coyote]

A woman, being the first VP, is a Big Deal. It is a FIRST. So yes. There are going to be more stories on it. And there should be. After 250 years we finally have a WOMAN elected the second highest office in the country.
Insisting that that somehow stores on the number of women running for the House is somehow equivalent is dishonest.
What you are doing here, or rather the OP, is what you on the right constantly seem to do. You point out something and claim it isn't being covered in the msn news as some sort of example of bias yet a look in the news typically shows that yes, it has been covered. So then you call it "semantics" and try and draw a false equivalency to support your claim. Compare it to the coverage of Democrat women being elected this term. Most of the articles I found were about BOTH in fact. So what wasn't covered?

It would be a big deal if Harris had earned it, but instead, it was one of those phoney 'first of its kind' type of things that puts the lie to the notion that it was for anything but the histrionics.

No, Harris was chosen solely for her intersectional qualities she was born with and never earned.

I am not impressed by that.

Women in the GOP get what they get because they work hard to deserve it on their merits, not Harris though.

I disagree with you on Harris. To say she didn't earn it is pretty unfair. She worked hard for it, in a number of capacities, and was also a candidate for the Democratic nomination. Disagreeing with her political positions is one thing, but then trying to marginalize her on the basis of race and gender is kind of disconcerting. She worked just as hard as any of those women in the GOP. Why on earth do you try to diminish that? I'm not about to diminish any of those GoP women's achievements, or any Dem women's achievements (though I think both sides have some whackos).

 

[Coyote]

I do as well. Most countries give a formal congratulations. Where I am seeing joy is countries that have been our allies traditionally - Western Europe, Canada, etc. Where I am seeing negative reactions towards it are those countries that are turning away from democratic ideals and towards authoritarianism - Hungary, Poland, for example, where President Trump had been forging closer relationships.

And the countries that celebrate Biden's premature win are also suffering from the same ills they want to re-inflict on us.

Anemic economic growth rates, Critical Race theory racism, more socialism, and a shrinking demographic growth rate that requires more and more immigration to replace the babies the Middle Class can not afford to bear and raise.

We the American working class dont want any of that BS.

Not sure those qualities applicable to who is or isn't president. The demographic growth rates are a long term problem but not necessarily bad. When societies become prosperous, birth rates go down - everywhere.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why on earth do you try to diminish that? I'm not about to diminish any of those GoP women's achievements, or any Dem women's achievements (though I think both sides have some whackos).

Because she was chosen specifically because she was a black woman, thats why.

 

[Coyote]

Why on earth do you try to diminish that? I'm not about to diminish any of those GoP women's achievements, or any Dem women's achievements (though I think both sides have some whackos).

Because she was chosen specifically because she was a black woman, thats why.

She was chosen because she was a black woman AND qualified. It's possible to be both.

 

[JimBowie1958]

She was chosen because she was a black woman AND qualified. It's possible to be both.

Yes, it is possible, but they didn't state that.

They were looking for a warm-bodied female black person to fill that slot.

She was chosen for those intersectional attributes she was born with and not for any other reason.

Her performance as California AG proves she is not fit for office as she was incompetent, took only the easy cases and pled the hard ones, and slept her way into office.

That she would be smoking pot at home while sending thousands of otherwise innocent people to prison for possession of small amounts of pot, is proof she is unfit for any office whatsoever.

 

[Coyote]

She was chosen because she was a black woman AND qualified. It's possible to be both.

Yes, it is possible, but they didn't state that.

They were looking for a warm-bodied female black person to fill that slot.

She was chosen for those intersectional attributes she was born with and not for any other reason.

Her performance as California AG proves she is not fit for office as she was incompetent, took only the easy cases and pled the hard ones, and slept her way into office.

That she would be smoking pot at home while sending thousands of otherwise innocent people to prison for possession of small amounts of pot, is proof she is unfit for any office whatsoever.

I don't think they NEED to state that (the obvious) - of course they are going pick someone who is also qualified. Pence was picked because they needed someone to give Trump authenticity to the evangelicals. Was he qualified?

I disagree with your claim she "slept her way to the top". It's a typical slam made against women in politics.