Court of International Trade puts Trump tariffs on hold

[The Duke]

The criminal President is OUT OF CONTROL. He's claiming powers he does not have, and his administration is both criminal and corrupt.

No. We have had tariffs since the beginning, oh ye who does not know American History. STFU with your hyperbolic and false accusations.

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff) | Title | FRASER | St. Louis Fed

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff), also known as An Act for Laying a Duty on Goods, Wares, and Merchandises Imported Into the United States; Hamilton Tariff; Act of July 4, 1789 by United States. Congress

fraser.stlouisfed.org

Where was this clown court when NAFTA went into effect, hmm?

 

[The Duke]

The blockers may lose their jobs.

 

[Lesh]

You first.

Charlie ******* Kirk?

 

[SeaMajor7]

The criminal President is OUT OF CONTROL. He's claiming powers he does not have, and his administration is both criminal and corrupt.

BULLSHIT.
Why don't you MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.
******* HOSER.
GTFOH

 

[Mac1958]

Charlie ******* Kirk?

Kirk speaks only Da Troof in MAGA World™!

 

[The Duke]

Congress gave the President the authority.

That is why there was a proposed bill to revoke that authority. The court is clueless.

I've said all I'm going to say.

That's all that needs to be said.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Another court overstepping its authority, but the stock markets love it.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

Court says Trump doesn't have the authority to set tariffs​

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5322889-court-rules-trump-tariffs/

Court of International Trade blocks Trump’s tariffs in sweeping ruling​

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/28/business/us-court-blocks-trumps-tariffs

US court blocks Trump from imposing the bulk of his tariffs​

This is the one that will gut Trump.

It will be a good day in the market. My goal for the end of the year should be met by tomorrow.

 

[Mac1958]

The criminal President is OUT OF CONTROL. He's claiming powers he does not have, and his administration is both criminal and corrupt.

It's clear that the plan going into this "administration" was to declare everything an EMERGENCY so that he/they could sidestep the Constitution.

It fit right in with the constant paranoid hyperbole he blows, and it fit right in with the constant paranoid hyperbole the flock gets from the media voices it trusts.

Then he just claims victimhood when America's courts tell him to pound sand with his bullshit.

Wash, rinse, grift, repeat.

 

[SeaMajor7]

It's clear that the plan going into this "administration" was to declare everything an EMERGENCY so that he/they could sidestep the Constitution.

It fit right in with the constant paranoid hyperbole he blows, and it fit right in with the constant paranoid hyperbole the flock gets from the media voices it trusts.

Then he just claims victimhood when America's courts tell him to pound sand with his bullshit.

Wash, rinse, grift, repeat.

No, that was the last PHANTOM ADMINISTRATION with their COVID EMERGENCY.
You ******* demented communist ASSHOLES are going TOO FAR.
One way or another, this darkness got to give...

 

[Lesh]

Kirk speaks only Da Troof in MAGA World™!

Who even pays attention to that racist asshole??

 

[Mac1958]

Who even pays attention to that racist asshole??

The same people who listen to Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, and who think the Earth is flat.

 

[citygator]

Oh stop! Please! My sides hurt!

View attachment 1116603

If you had a penny for every time you were right, you'd still not have a nickel.

Once again, Trump will win and move on putting America first.

The Left are so desperate now, they are throwing judges at Trump faster than the Chinese can throw spy balloons at Biden.


View attachment 1116604

I’m never wrong. Trump has lost almost every case including Supreme Court cases.

 

[berg80]

Seems otherwise to me: "Regardless of whether the court views the President’s actions through the nondelegation doctrine, through the major questions doctrine, or simply with separation of powers in mind, any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional,” the opinion continued. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5322889-court-rules-trump-tariffs/

A panel of federal judges on Wednesday blocked President Trump from imposing some of his steepest tariffs on China and other U.S. trading partners, finding that federal law did not grant him “unbounded authority” to tax imports from nearly every country around the world.

The ruling, by the U.S. Court of International Trade, delivered an early yet significant setback to Mr. Trump, undercutting his primary leverage as he looks to pressure other nations into striking trade deals more beneficial to the United States.

Before Mr. Trump took office, no president had sought to invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law, to impose tariffs on other nations. The law, which primarily concerns trade embargoes and sanctions, does not even mention tariffs.

But Mr. Trump adopted a novel interpretation of its powers as he announced, and then suspended, high levies on scores of countries in April. He also used the law to impose tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico in return for what he said was their role in sending fentanyl to the United States.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/28/business/trump-tariffs-blocked-federal-court.html

Seems like a stretch to say the abuse of a law passed in 1977 to address the authority to regulate international economic transactions during a declared national emergency is unconstitutional but I suppose one could argue that characterization covers the abuse of any law.

 

[citygator]

No. We have had tariffs since the beginning, oh ye who does not know American History. STFU with your hyperbolic and false accusations.

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff) | Title | FRASER | St. Louis Fed

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff), also known as An Act for Laying a Duty on Goods, Wares, and Merchandises Imported Into the United States; Hamilton Tariff; Act of July 4, 1789 by United States. Congress

fraser.stlouisfed.org

Where was this clown court when NAFTA went into effect, hmm?

NAFTA was voted on by congress.

 

[berg80]

No. We have had tariffs since the beginning, oh ye who does not know American History. STFU with your hyperbolic and false accusations.

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff) | Title | FRASER | St. Louis Fed

Tariff of 1789 (Hamilton Tariff), also known as An Act for Laying a Duty on Goods, Wares, and Merchandises Imported Into the United States; Hamilton Tariff; Act of July 4, 1789 by United States. Congress

fraser.stlouisfed.org

Where was this clown court when NAFTA went into effect, hmm?

You really need to get out of the habit of thinking every court that rules against Dotard makes it clownish. The fact is trump is the clown.

 

[SeaMajor7]

I’m never wrong.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaa.

 

[The Duke]

NAFTA was voted on by congress.

Drafted by H.W. Bush. That doesn't mean it was good.
Trump's trying to undo some of that damage now.

 

[Dekster]

A panel of federal judges on Wednesday blocked President Trump from imposing some of his steepest tariffs on China and other U.S. trading partners, finding that federal law did not grant him “unbounded authority” to tax imports from nearly every country around the world.

The ruling, by the U.S. Court of International Trade, delivered an early yet significant setback to Mr. Trump, undercutting his primary leverage as he looks to pressure other nations into striking trade deals more beneficial to the United States.

Before Mr. Trump took office, no president had sought to invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law, to impose tariffs on other nations. The law, which primarily concerns trade embargoes and sanctions, does not even mention tariffs.

But Mr. Trump adopted a novel interpretation of its powers as he announced, and then suspended, high levies on scores of countries in April. He also used the law to impose tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico in return for what he said was their role in sending fentanyl to the United States.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/28/business/trump-tariffs-blocked-federal-court.html

Seems like a stretch to say the abuse of a law passed in 1977 to address the authority to regulate international economic transactions during a declared national emergency is unconstitutional but I suppose one could argue that characterization covers the abuse of any law.

Seems to me they are clearly saying that it is unconstitutional no matter which way the worm turns

 

[The Duke]

Seems to me they are clearly saying that it is unconstitutional no matter which way the worm turns

And they are wrong and will lose.

 

[JoeB131]

are you raising a glass with your CCP superiors traitor ?

Again, watch the markets today and how they react to this news.